Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Structural theories

Good Essays
1714 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Structural theories
Structural theories
One of the theories is Marxism who studies society on a macro perspective so they generate a lot of statistics. They concentrate a lot on class and believe there is conflict between two opposing classes’ bourgeoisie and working class. They have a similar view to the social action theory and that view is in society there is struggle between the powerful and the powerless. They also have a view on feminism and that is it’s not just men who exploit women but also capitalist. Their view is capitalism is the root of all exploitation which also creates competition between social classes. They have views on the role of the family and they believe family maintains capitalism. They have a very strong opinion on school and believe education reproduce a passive workforce for capitalism as in students are taught workers should accept their position and that causes less conflict for the capitalists. They also believe education creates class inequality as in upper class are meant to succeed whilst lower class are meant to fail. They believe school is just preparation for the work force as in the rules students are told follow. This creates ideological dominants by the school as they promote the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor. They also believe that education reproduces the public structure.
The Marxist theory has been criticised by other theories which is typical in sociology. Functionalists believe they focus too much on class and need to look more at ethnicity, sex and gender differences. Feminists also believe that woman is exploited in a patriarchal society and not just capitalism. Patriarchal is male dominant. Functionalist also disagree with their point that society is conflictive and they believe society is harmonious as we all share the same common set of values.
The social action theory believes there are two ways to view society. One of the ways is the structural macro view and the other is interpretism. The social action theory tends to interact with small groups so in education they will study separate classes and not the whole educational system. They do not believe in the institutions of society as our behaviour is only influenced by the people around us. In fact they ignore the institutions of society as it influences capitalism. They look into the teacher student relationship and see how students are treated. They have asked teachers who are perfect student is in their eyes and the majority has said the middle class children can succeed more. However the social action theory does not believe our class effects our actions as it is all down to the individual’s choices. They also look into stereotypes and labelling and see how much someone labelled is affected. Most of the theories are the work of Max Weber and he does not believe people are puppets as it is down to our choices. Like the Marxist they also believe that society is conflictive.
Like every perspective the social action theory is also criticised. The Marxist believes that they ignore capitalism and the conflict it causes. Their theory has been criticised for being hard to test as they generate no statistics. This is because they research on a micro scale which only enables them to look at little aspects of society. Marxism have also criticised them for focussing too much on an individual and ignoring the big picture and that makes them ignore the class competition there is in society. They are also seen as ignoring the gender and ethnicity inequalities and they focus too much on the micro scale. This is why structuralisms do not like this theory.
Feminists are a theory that believes women are exploited in three different ways. A patriarchal society which is male dominant, subordination which exploits women and ideology which exploits everyone. Their main theory is those women are oppressed but there are four different feminist theories. The different feminists study on a micro scale and look at different roles, race and sexuality. They believe black women are exploited much more than middle class white women who shouldn’t really be complaining anyway as they do not get exploited as much. They believe lower class black women will not succeed due to society’s opinion about them. They also believe all women are not the same so they cannot be treated the same. There are also radical feminists who are the most extreme. They are anti men and believe men are the problem and the enemy. They believe in a patriarchal society and that woman are exploited in public and private places. Public is places such as work and private is domestically. They believe in schools that men are more likely to be head teacher than a woman due to the gender inequalities. They also say there may be acts in place in favour of women but that the acts take too long to come in. The liberal feminists as seen as the soft ones. They believe that women are gradually overcoming inequalities and the proof is the equal pay act and the sexual discrimination act. These acts provide more confidence and equality to the women. They also see women doing better than men at GCSE and A level is another way of them overcoming the inequalities. There is also Marxist feminists who believe the oppression is caused by capitalism. They also believe that women perform several functions for capitalism and that they reproduce the labour force. Such as reproduction and that child will grow up to simply work for the capitalists. They believe that woman absorb men’s anger and frustration which are caused at work, so men get exploited at work and then they take their anger on women which is what causes domestic abuse.
Like other theories they are also criticised in many ways. Liberal feminists are criticised as women are still not getting the top jobs so gradual change is still not available. The statistics say only 12% of women are getting the top jobs which mean 88% of the top jobs are men employees. That proves there is still a vast inequality between the genders. There are also things such as only men are advertised on TV for the top jobs as if it was meant to be for men. The equal pay act is also criticised as there may be an equal pay act but women still do not get the same pay as women. Radical feminists are criticised for being too extreme and blaming men only as women can also exploit other women.
Modernists believe that education is controlled centrally by the state and that you have a fixed timetable when you are in the school premises, whether you’re a teacher or student. Post modernists believe that society is continually changing. They are continually searching for the truth because like society it is also changing through time. They believe individuals are constantly learning new skills to be able to live in the new era. This means we are continually getting taught something new. They reject facts and statistics as they believe they are too old for this modern society and they also believe that education is controlled by communities. They also believe in meritocracy and this theory is quite close to interpritism. They are also quite dismissive of functionalists and disagree with most of their work. They believe in this modern era schools are more diverse with introduction of things such as faith schools which is making education more diverse. They are fascinated by the mass media and high tech as that is the reason why society has changed. They believe that society is become much more modern so all the theories are too old as living now is much different then back in the old days. They also believe that society has excelled beyond the structure and institutions which completely crosses out the other theories. They also believe that schools inspire creativity and self supervision which comes in handy for the students in the future. They believe that in the modern era jobs are more flexible and specialised
Like every theory Post modernists are also criticised. Others argue that they exaggerate too much about diversity and the national curriculum is proof of their exaggeration. They have also been criticised for ignoring gender inequalities and that is by the feminists. Marxists believe that they ignore the fact that capitalism still exists even in the modern society and that the modern state produce passive workers for capitalism. This means students are taught to accept their position which means there will be less conflict between the capitalists and workers.
Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus and a set of shared norms and values. Functionalists often compare society to a biological organism like the human body. Talcott Parsons believe sociology is like science and you can study society the same way a biologist and chemist can. He also believes in sociology you can create a hypothesis and prove it which is exactly what scientists do. They see family as an important sub system in society and it performs four functions to meet the needs of the society and its members. These four functions are sex, reproduction, socialisation and economy. Their perfect family is the nuclear family with the typical husband wife and children family. They also believe in meritocracy which is the harder you work the more you succeed if you had the opportunities. They also believe society is harmonious and there is no conflict what so ever. This is because they believe we share values and beliefs which makes us less likely conflict. They also have a positive view over families and believe they are protective and supportive.
There are many criticisms of functionalists such as social action theory and Marxists believe society is conflictive and proof of this is strikes and protests. These prove there is conflict between the capitalists and workers whether its low wages or long hours there is a disagreement. Marxism has an opposite view of family to them and they believe families are beneficial to capitalists. Feminists will argue that they do ignore the gender inequality which does cause conflict in society. Postmodernists are completely dismissive of functionalists and don’t agree one bit with their theory.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marxists take a critical view of the role of education. Capitalist society is essentially a two-class system, with a ruling class exploiting the working class. Marxist see education as being run in the interests if the ruling class. For example, Althusser argues that education is an important ideological state apparatus that helps to control people’s ideas and beliefs. He suggests education has to purposes. It reproduces class inequalities through the generations by ensuring that most working-class pupils experience education failure. Education also legitimates this inequality, persuading the working class to accept educational and social inequalities. Other Marxists have also pointed to the existence of a hidden curriculum in schools.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist and Feminist sociologists have criticised Murdoch’s theory. They say that Functionalism ignores conflict and exploitation within society. Feminists see the family as being patriarchal and serving the needs of men and Marxists see the family as meeting the needs of capitalism and not the needs of the family members.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social action theories are known as micro theories which take a bottom-up approach to studying society; they look at how individuals within society interact with each other. There are many forms of social action theories, the main ones being symbolic interactionism, phenomenology and ethnomethodology. They are all based on the work of Max Weber, a sociologist, who acknowledged that structural factors can shape our behaviour but individuals do have reasons for their actions. He used this to explain why people behave in the way in which they do within society. Weber saw four types of actions which are commonly committed within society; rational, this includes logical plans which are used to achieve goals, traditional-customary behaviour, this is behaviour which is traditional and has always been done; he also saw affectual actions, this includes an emotion associated with an action and value-rational actions, this is behaviour which is seen as logical by an individual. Weber’s discovery of these actions can therefore be seen as useful in the study of society. Weber discovered these actions by using his concept of verstehan, a deeper understanding. However, some sociologists have criticised him as they argue that verstehan cannot be accomplished as it is not possible to see thing in the way that others see them, leaving sociologists to question whether Weber’s social action theory is useful in the study of society.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this assignment, I am going to briefly explore the definitions of Functionalism, Marxism and Feminism and how their ideologies affect contemporary society in Great Britain. In doing so I will give examples that expand upon the definitions and illustrate that such ideologies are evident and still have an impact on the society we live in.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As mentioned in Item A, Marxists take a critical view of the role of education. They see society as based on class divisions and capitalist exploitations. The capitalist society is a two class system as mentioned in Item A and it consists of a ruling class, the bourgeoisie and the working class, the proletariat. The bourgeoisie exploits the proletariat according to Marxists and they believe that the education system only serves the needs and interests of the ruling class, as mentioned in Item A. Marxists also education as functioning to prevent revolution and maintain capitalism.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some would argue that the education system mainly exists to select and prepare students for their future work roles and careers. Marxists believe that the education system’s role is the ideological apparatus of the state; it spreads ruling-class ideology and favours the middle class. Marxists such as Althusser, Bowels & Gintus and Bourdieu disagree with this statement as they argue working class children get a second class education compared to middle class and are given an unrealistic expectation for the future.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the surface, the narrator in The Yellow Wallpaper simply shows an insane woman who began suffering from depression after the birth of her child. The narrator was placed into a house, which was in the middle of nowhere, where she received dangerous treatment and often gets belittled by her husband, who is also her doctor. Her treatment required her not to do anything active, especially writing. Although some would conclude that the narrator of The Yellow Wallpaper is just about an insane woman struggling with post-partum depression and isolation, it shows the protagonists struggle with trying to break out of the mental constraints she has been placed under and her need for self-expression through her journal.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology 24 marks

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the Marxists, our society is largely influenced by wealth. They believe that big businesses help capitalists because majority of the money goes towards them. Also, when big business owners have children the business will pass down to them which means the rich will stay rich and the poor will stay poor as it is harder for them to get a good change. Middle and lower class people are taught in schools the rules and how to respect the higher class. This supports the Marxist theory as it shows how the family does help the interests of capitalism.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The definition of structural functionalism in a society is to have various subsystems that work to serve a larger purpose for society as a whole. Canada is a perfect example of this as our society relies on these subsystems to work properly in order to meet its main goal of maintaining a strong, rich and healthy country, preserving our natural resources as well as providing a safe place for our citizens to live.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a conflict view that sees society as being based on class divisions and exploitation. Marxists argue that in society there are two classes – the bourgeoisie which is the ruling class and the proletariat which is the working class. The capitalist class owns the means of production and make their profit by exploiting the labour of the working class. This creates class conflict that could threaten the stability of capitalism or even result in a revolution to overthrow it. Social institutions such as the education system reproduce class inequalities and play an ideological role by persuading exploited workers that inequality is justified and acceptable.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxism is a worldview and method of societal analysis that focuses on class relations and societal conflict. Marxist sociologists believe that economics are what determines society. These include things like: politics, religion, law and culture. Basically they think that the way goods are made and distributed determines the ways…

    • 601 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7 p1

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxism was introduced and studied by Karl Marx during 1818 and 1883. The Marxist view is based on the conflicts and interests of the society, it also strongly highlights on the importance of conflict in societies and communities. They also believe that economics are the bases of progressing and social life this can be achieved by struggling through social classes. The two classes that Marx discussed about were the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie class is a small powerful group who may have owned factories or own companies whereas the Proletariat is a poorer group of workers. The way a Marxists thinks is based on the financial structures and systems as well as social class meaning that these factors are vital in the Marxist view.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Founded by Karl Marx, Marxism is a school of thought which explores the relationship between the upper and lower classes of society. It was taught through Marxism that the main cause for historical change was disputes between social classes. This social warfare stemmed from the belief that the state, or government, for as long as it has existed, has used its authority to oppress the working masses for the benefit of the wealthy few. The relationship between the proletariats, the working class, and the bourgeoisie, the rich, was posited as one of opposition and conflict. Marx believed that a successful capitalist-run society was impossible and doomed to fail.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism shares in common with functionalism the macro structural approach to society, looking at it as a whole, however a key difference between the two theories is that marxism is a conflict perspective, that is the conflict of class between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat also known as the ruling and working classes. The work of Karl Marx in the mid 1800s constitutes the main body of this conflict theory, he wrote that the central institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by which capital (money, machines, factories and other material objects) is controlled by a small minority of the population, leading to opposed classes i.e. the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Cohen 1978). Marxists believe that society is based on ascribed status which is given by birth or family background, therefore the bourgeoisie pass down their land and properties to their children, keeping the wealth in the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Structural Functionalist

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As time goes on, more and more people are suffering from a mental illness. In the United States, mental health typically is defined as one's psychological, emotional and social well-being. Research shows that in the last year, at least a quarter of college students has either been diagnosed or treated for a mental health problem (Mooney, Knox, and Scacht, 2016, p. 35). My initial thought was that 25 percent students seems to be too high to be true. However, I myself have narcolepsy, depression and social anxiety disorder. Many of my friends have disorders such as dyslexia, attention deficit hyperactive disorder and different anxiety disorders. The structural-functionalist, conflict and symbolic interactionist reflect on different perspectives that people believe connect to mental illness.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics