Preview

Structure of Judicial System in Malaysia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1090 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Structure of Judicial System in Malaysia
Structure of judicial system in Malaysia

Federal Court Superior Courts

Court of Appeal

High Court(Malaya) High Court(Sabah&Sarawak)

Syariah Court Syariah Court Native Court

Sessions Court Sessions Court

Juvenile court Magistrate Court Magistrate court Juvenile Court

Penghulu’s Court Subordinate Courts

The judicial powers of the country are exercised by the subordinate courts, the High Courts and the Federal Court, organized in a hierarchy with the subordinate courts at the lower level and the superior courts (comprising the High Courts, the Court of Appeal and Federal Court) at the higher level. At the apex of the hierarchy is the Federal Court, which has been in existence since 1 January 1985. It is the final appeal court in Malaysia replacing the former Supreme Court. It is headed by the Lord President. Below the Federal Court are the Court of Appeal and the High Court of Malaya (for West Malaysia). Both the courts have co-ordinate jurisdiction. Each of these courts is headed by a Chief Justice. Below the High Courts are the Sessions Courts. Each of these courts is presided over by a sessions court judge. On the same hierarchy as the Sessions Court is the Juvenile court, which is a special court, which deals with juvenile offenders. This court presided over by a first class magistrate. Below the Sessions Courts are the Magistrates Courts, which are presided over by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The federal courts system is made up of two types of courts; the first type is known as the Article III court. In the article III courts it includes the U.S District Courts, the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court. It also has two special courts the U.S. Court of Claims and the U.S. Court of International Trade. The judges in the federal court are appointed by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate. Federal judges remain in office a lifetime. These courts are considered special because unlike other courts, they are not of general jurisdiction that can hear almost any case. The second type of court is also established by congress and those courts are the magistrate court and bankruptcy courts.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja 224 Week 1

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Federal court consists are military courts, international courts and trading, and also includes ninety four district courts. The district courts are used for trials and convictions. The Federal court systems also deal with all tax situations. The Federal courts have twelve circuits in the appellate courts. The appellate courts are used for appealing cases that were once heard in trial. If you want to appeal your conviction, the appellate court is where you should have your case heard. The Supreme Court is the highest possible court. It has nine justices with one chief justice. The Supreme Court only hears about two hundred cases a year, so it is very rare for the justices to accept to hear your case if you chose to try and appeal within the Supreme Court.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicially, the contrasts between federal government and state government could not be starker. The federal judiciary is simple and orderly, with three levels of courts – district courts, appeals courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court, the final word on all statutory and constitutional matters. All federal judges are appointed, not elected, and Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, with the specific intent of removing the judiciary from the pressures of electoral politics, allowing protection of minority interests in a government system designed to allow majority rule. In contrast, the Texas judiciary is complicated and confusing. The Texas Constitution establishes six types of courts, some of which have concurrent or overlapping jurisdictions.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Juvenile Justice System is part of the criminal law system that focuses on those individuals who are between the ages of 9 and 18. This system was set up for those persons who did criminal acts, but who are not yet considered adults. In most states the age for criminal culpability is 18. While the age of being treated as a juvenile in the court system is up to the age of 18, this can depend on the crime. Juveniles can be transferred to the adult court system if the juvenile court waves or relinquishes its jurisdiction. Juvenile law is mainly governed by state laws…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The federal court system has a similar structure to the state court system. The lowest level is the federal district court. The district court hears the civil and criminal cases that pertain to the potential unconstitutionality or impartiality of a specific state court. Federal accusations of fraud and drug crimes can also be seen here. The next level, similar to the state court system, is the U.S. Court of Appeals. This is the intermediary appellate court level where cases that have been appealed are reviewed. Atop this is the United States Supreme Court, the highest form of authority in the country. It is here where few cases are officially sent to trial, but instead cases may be reviewed by one or a group of the justices and sent back down the line.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    State Courts are established by the Constitution and laws of each state. State court judges are selected in a variety of ways, including election, appointment for a given number of years, appointment for life, and combinations of these methods. The highest state court is often referred to as a Supreme Court. Some states also have an intermediate Court of Appeals. Below these appeals courts are the state trial courts. Some are referred to as Circuit or District Courts.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Juvenile Court system is managed under the theory of rehabilitation rather than punishment in which also acts as parens patriae. Parens patriae is when a parent is reluctant or incapable to control a child, the state has the power to step in and act in the child’s and society’s best interest (Meyer & Grant, 2003). All juvenile courts have a judge of some type and have limited jurisdictions in which the judge is only allowed to hear certain cases. In addition, limited jurisdiction in juvenile courts depends on the age of the child, and the crime charged. In all states youths may be tried in an adult court instead of a juvenile court, depending on the condition by statutory exclusion, judicial wavier or concurrent jurisdictions (Meyer & Grant, 2003). A juvenile’s right changes by individual state legislations and policies (CJi, 2012). Juvenile’s do not have all features of the due process granted to the adults for the reason that the professionals are more concerned with balancing juvenile rehabilitation among protecting society. Juveniles brought into the juvenile justice system are processed through intake, adjudication, disposition and post-adjudications. The process of intake is to help determine the appropriate place for the youth such as a diversion program or informal dismissal if either does not fit then by petition the youth is sent to juvenile court. The adjudication process is less formal than the adult trials in addition the juveniles have fewer rights than the adults in the judicial process (CJi, 2012). Next, the disposition process is when sentencing is determined according to the youth’s social, educational, and other needs. Last the post-adjudication process which ensures the sentencing is followed after the disposition. I believe the juvenile process should differ from the adult process but more and more juveniles are processed as an adult and never get the chance to try a…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lower courts first and foremost handle small criminal issues, for instance prostitution, traffic violations, and preliminary phases on felony cases. The parliamentary periods of any felony cases are in charge of arraignments, bail hearings, and so on. Lower courts can also distribute warrants to the local and state police departments for search and seizure’s.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think the higher court judges rule and appoint the judges who work for juvenile courts, who can handle all the juvenile cases and separated those cases by category and according to crime charges. Juvenile’s delinquency cases are those cases which juveniles violated a law or a serious crime which done by juveniles. In other hand the young offenders who charge with the offence but cannot be classified as criminal violation offence that can only be applied to children, which is why rehabilitation program is must for those kids who can turn back to their normal life.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nevada State Court System

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The District Court: The District Court has jurisdiction over all matters except the municipal court and jurisdiction of justice. This court has jurisdiction over the Juvenile Court as explained above.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial branch of government is made up of the court system. The Supreme Court is the highest court.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Court Workgroup

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Neubauer and Fradella (2014) we know the Judges are the highest authority in any court. Generally the judges of the juvenile court just like judges in any other court are the highest authority. They take care of solving all the matters that are left opened in the case by the prosecution and or the defense attorney. Moreover, judges in the juvenile court sometimes might have the aid of hearing officers, typically attorneys who are selected by the court to hear juvenile cases. After hearing this cases they make recommendations to the judge about the case (Fradella and Neubauer, 2014). This individuals are placed there by the court with…

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts in the United States are made up and governed by the United States Constitution and then separated by Federal and State levels. Both levels are different in how they are made up, how they run and the laws they are in charge of enforcing.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Court System

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Meanwhile, American in urban communities were going up against high rates of child poverty. Nevertheless the community put very little effort on city brainpowers to propose an answer for this rising issue. Adolescent court judges are named by the main judge of the Superior Court of the circuit in When this process first started the system was easy going and there were very little legal representation. When a crime was committed by a youth they would stand before a judge and the victim to avoid jail time, so they avoided legal…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Jamaican Court System

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Based on the English common law . Judicial independence is guaranteed by the Jamaican Constitution. The Chief Justice: Head of the Jamaican Judiciary. Appointed by the Governor General of Jamaica, on the recommendation of the Prime Minster after consultation with the Leader of the Opposition. Shows the hierarchy of Courts in The Jamaican Judicial system Civil Proceedings…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays