In quotes, “Black Quashee,” “up to the ears in pumpkins,” and “working about half an hour a day,” was a disgrace. He described the black man in the West Indies as “idle”. Carlyle’s description of laisse faire economics was letting men alone (Persky 167), but men required leadership and the white landowners knew best, and this idleness was the result, of laisse fair economics. People needed to accept their positions in life and the sooner we acknowledge this, the better off we would be. In Carle’s view the market would not encourage people to work but sell and people would grow lazy and idle if the labor market did not work for them. A strong leader recognizes this and needs to force the weak to work. The solution is a strong paternalism permitting this to take place. Democracy would allow the weak to partake in the political process and decision making where they should not otherwise be permitted to and for good reason (Persky …show more content…
The despotism of the elite would certainly stunt the development of the weak, “have almost always hitherto used their strength to keep the others weak,” Mill wrote. This was the way of old laws and needed to be resisted at all cost. Instead of looking at Negroes negatively, Mill saw their idle time as a benefit of the market system not idleness as a result of Emancipation. Market forces had actually drove prices