Preview

Study Guide for Transhumanism and Religion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Study Guide for Transhumanism and Religion
Transhumanism – Exam II
Calvin Mercer

Synthesize all this into a fabulous essay. When you take the test, label each essay with CAPITAL TITLE I have given. Write only on the front side of your paper.

HUGHES. Name and give a 2-3 sentence summary of the various players that Hughes identifies in the biopolitical landscape. Then, give a full presentation of his vision for a democratic transhumanism. Then, critique this.

FEMINISM. State clearly and discuss a feminist argument for and against H+.

MAX MORE. Who is Max More. Detail his role in H+.

PERSONHOOD. What are the issues and possibilities regarding personhood and H+.

GOOD AND EVIL. Are human beings as a species basically good or evil and what are the implications of the answer for H+. Personal!

CONSIDER EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CHAPTERS FROM THE MAHER-MERCER BOOK AS A POSSIBLE SEPARATE ESSAY QUESTION. IN EACH ESSAY MAKE SURE YOU WEAVE IN WHATEVER PETERS SAID IN THE “AFTERWORD” AND ONE NON-RELIGIOUS PERSPECTIVE.

REFORMED PROTESTANT—CAMERON/DEBAET
PROGRESSIVE PROTESTANT—COLE-TURNER
JAINISM—FOHR
DAOISM—KOHN
TANTRA—LIDKE/DIRNBERGER
BUDDHISM—MAHER
ISLAM—MUSA
ROMAN CATHOLICISM—NICHOLS

SOMA. Summary and discuss Mercer’s thesis about H+ and soma.

BODY BOOK. Describe the Mercer/Maher proposal for a book of original articles from various religions about the role of the body in H+.

CRYONICS THE BIBLE. Present and critique Mercer’s article, “Cryonics and Religion: Friends or Foes?”

Hughes Democratic Transhumanism
Bioluddites (critics/opposers of transhumanism)

Belinda: Many other disciplines have had ongoing discourse and debates on how to address enhancement technologies. On one end of the spectrum we have the bioluddites, which consists of religious conservatives, feminists, environmentalist, disability rights supporters and activists who oppose genetically engineered food, cloning, nanotechnology, embryonic stem cell research, invitro fertilization and human enhancement. Some

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap World History Summary

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    AP WORLD HISTORY STUDY GUIDE FOR EXAM ONE: “FOUNDATIONS: PREHISTORY – 600 C.E.” TERMS/IDEAS TO KNOW: 1. Pastorialism 2. Patrilineal 3. Matrilineal 4.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Individuals and Society should address ethical issues because both sides raise good points and whenever scientists use Biotechnology, they need to make sure it’s okay with everyone else and to be very careful so no thing apocalyptic happens.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What do you think is the most important similarity and which is the most important difference? Use specifics to support your answer.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most people would concede that cloning and genetic enhancements are two notorious words that most would not consent with. In Mr. Kass’s article “Preventing Brave New World” commences on the astonishing achievements in bio-medical science and technology. Mr. Leon E. Kass agrees that people should be obliged for the breakthrough of advanced bio medical science and technology. Mr. Kass’s incredible work in bio-ethical science has placed this very well known philosopher in the white house with the Bush’s administration. Mr. Kass mentions in his article that we live in a world where transforming powers are already being applied in the 20th century, For example; In vitro fertilization, bottled embryos wombs, surrogate wombs, cloning, genetic screening,…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humans are on a constant quest in the search for perfection and advancement in all areas of life through progressive scientific knowledge. From such a stance, the future of humans appears boundless with all the potential possibilities biotechnology provides, but such developments will cause ethical, social and biological implications.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pol 201 Week 5 Bd

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For this discussion I have chosen stem cell research as my issue area. Stem cell research is a controversial research that uses cells from human embryos to potentially cure diseases. Stem cells can be found in almost every multi cellular living organism on the planet. It plays a crucial and irreplaceable part in our growth from embryonic development to adulthood. Stem cells are classified as undifferentiated cells, one that has yet to evolve or be assigned to a specific function by the host body. A stem cell would continue to divide, through the process of mitosis, until it eventually matures into a differentiated cell, which would either be committed as a building block for the hosts, or used in a…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic Engineering Debate: Are There Lines We Shouldn’t Cross? written by Jessica Erickson, shows that just because we can genetic engineer, doesn’t mean we should leave it unsupervised. Currently genetic engineering is available for plants, animals, and humans. Genetic engineering for plants and animals is quicker and less complex then doing it on humans. The next subject Erickson wrights about is the uses of genetic engineering. Erickson believes that genetic engineering could be good if it benefits diseases, prevent, and treatments, on the other hand Erickson believes genetic engineering could be bad if it is used for “designer babies”. Erickson believes that there should be a “Do not cross line”, which means that there should be government…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many current legal and ethical issues in bioengineering and biotechnology including athletic and cognitive enhancements, stem cell research, cloning, genetic engineering, and genetically modified organisms. Biotechnology is “the manipulation of biological systems and organisms through technological means”(p. 471). There is tension between valuing liberty to pursue happiness of biotechnologies, and the potential negative outcomes of these technologies. Bioengineering, is the construction of machines to alter or supplement organisms.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the arguments that bioconservation puts out there with the idea of eugenics is that the idea of it is wrong. They see bio-enhancements are wrong and people should not mess with them. They focus on four different arguments that are against the idea of eugenics.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Noss, David S., and Blake R. Grangaard. A History of the World 's Religions. 12th Edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc., 2008.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What right does man have to accuse another of such a dastardly feat? It is nearly an undoubtable fact that one day man and technology will form a unity and biotechnology will become integrated into everyday life. Man has no right to play God, but man also has no right to attack every technological breakthrough with controversy and radical accusations. “Playing God” is a cliché that has become all too common in the present day. Man has every natural right to alter and improve itself as a race through biomedical augmentations. It is inevitable that technological breakthroughs will have widespread effects on the fields of biology and physiology. Biotechnological developments will also lead to grave changes in global commerce and consumerism within a span as short as the next 20 years. Theological and ethical arguments against replacing the natural human form do not possess the factual backing, nor the rationale, to effectively make the accusation that man is “playing God” with its inevitable biotechnologies and procedures. The human body has near-unlimited capabilities as a biotechnological receptor, and the possibility that this will become a reality is up to society. If humanity can accept the technologic lifestyle it is destined toward, then ethical debates and moral rationales will finally stop getting in the way of scientific…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Technology has improved rapidly over the past millennium, however there is still a lot to be learned, in terms of the long term effects of such ”Promethean powers”. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a perfect example of how much can wrong in such little time if scientists refuse to take ethical and moral responsibilities for their own creations. Many practices such as gene manipulation and cloning are being done even without adequate scientific knowledge of their impacts on the human race and the environment. Society is being turned blind to the thought of these types of technology which they believe will be beneficial in the long run. Instead they are proving to cause more harm than good, and scientists are refusing to take proper actions and responsibilities against these types of technologies. Scientists nowadays are refusing to eat their own genetically modified organisms, out of fear that will get cancer and other illnesses. These same scientists are still working for the same companies who produce genetically modified organisms for all the people to buy and eat. It just goes to show that nowadays it is all about corporate profit rather than the good of the people. Corporate profit is being chosen at the expense of human health and well being, and since the creation of these organisms are so complex, the fingers…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics