Liberty University/ Business 561
Responding to Legal Issues in Business
In responding to Mr. Alan Geason’s paper titled: “Legal Issues in Business,” I agree with the legal issues that was presented as well as the biblical reflections as referenced to Job and suffering. Even though Barney has been dealt with some unfortunate circumstances, there is something redemptive with overcoming and persevering through obstacles. For Barney, he is faced with legal issues involving his mountain home property, his beach house, and his 1963 Ford Galaxy vehicle.
The Mountain Home
In the case of Barney and his mountainside property, the issue of joint tenancy with right of survivorship is rightly addressed. Joint tenancy with right of survivorship defined is: “A method of property ownership by more than one person. Under joint tenancy with right of survivorship, when one of the owners dies, the property passes to the surviving owners” (Webster’s New World Finance and Investment Dictionary, 2003). So it is clear that Opie by definition does not have a claim or right to the property at the passing of his father, Andy. “A large number of joint tenants select the tenancy precisely because of the high degree of assurance that there will be no entanglement with probate” (Orth, 2009).
Mr. Geason also gives wonderful reason in not pursuing any legal action against Ernest living on the property because of adverse possession. “Most states provide that when a person openly treats realty as his or her own, without protest or permission from the real owner, for a statutorily established period of time, ownership is automatically vested in that person” (Kubasek, Brennan, and Browne, 2012).
The Beach House
Mr. Geason is right in bringing up the eminent domain as a legal way to seize Barney’s home property. Mr. Geason cited the famous case of Kelo v. New London. In this case, the Supreme Court in 2005 sided with the city of New London in seizing private property for revitalization and development in order to bring new jobs and stimulate the economy. Barney should be given fair market value for his beach side home. Rather than a long drawn out court battle, Barney should settle with the city.
The Ford Galaxy Automobile
Mr. Geason makes a good point with discussing the rightful possession of the vehicle’s title. It is clear that Carl was at fault for stealing the vehicle and then trying to sell a stolen vehicle. The used car dealership was at fault for not acquiring a lawful title at the time of purchase. It is clear that Barney should not have to pay any amount of money to have his car returned.
The Spiritual Principle
Barney has been given some very hard circumstances that can make any average person feel sorry for him. Mr. Geason gives the right analogy of Barney’s dilemma to the story of Job in the Old Testament. There can always be something gained spiritually from a situation that turns for the worse when we are pursuing a continuing love relationship with God. “Job, like other righteous sufferers--e.g., Daniel in the lion’s den (Dnl. 6)--serves as an example to encourage others who find their faith severely tested. In the New Testament (Jas. 5:11) Job is commended for his patience or steadfastness” (Bromiley, 1982). Sacred scripture gives us the spiritual principle that God is always at work, even in and through suffering, pain, disappointment, and setbacks. “And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose” (Romans 8:28). Encouraging Barney to seek God in these setbacks is the key to growing spiritually and becoming all that God wants him to be.
References
Joint tenancy with right of survivorship. (2003). In Webster 's New World Finance and Investment Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.liberty.edu:2048/login?url=http://www.credoreference.com/entry/wileynwfid/joint_tenancy_with_right_of_survivorship Orth, J. V. (2009). The perils of joint tenancies. Real Property, Trust, and Estate Law Journal,
44(3), 427-440. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/208162304?accountid=12085
Kubasek, Brennan, and Browne. (2012). The Legal Environment of Business. A Critical Approach,
Law of Property: Real and Personal (Ch. 14). Pg. 382. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. ISBN-13; 978-0-13-266484-4.
Bromiley, G.W. (1982). Suffering. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol 4, pg. 651
191 ISBN 0-8028-8162-9.
The Spirit-Filled Life Bible (1991). Thomas Nelsen. The Holy Bible, New King James Version
ISBN 0-8499-1222-9.
References: Joint tenancy with right of survivorship. (2003). In Webster 's New World Finance and Investment Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.liberty.edu:2048/login?url=http://www.credoreference.com/entry/wileynwfid/joint_tenancy_with_right_of_survivorship Orth, J. V. (2009). The perils of joint tenancies. Real Property, Trust, and Estate Law Journal, 44(3), 427-440. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/208162304?accountid=12085 Kubasek, Brennan, and Browne. (2012). The Legal Environment of Business. A Critical Approach, Law of Property: Real and Personal (Ch. 14). Pg. 382. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. ISBN-13; 978-0-13-266484-4. Bromiley, G.W. (1982). Suffering. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol 4, pg. 651 191 ISBN 0-8028-8162-9. The Spirit-Filled Life Bible (1991). Thomas Nelsen. The Holy Bible, New King James Version ISBN 0-8499-1222-9.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Janet (taxpayer) residing in Australia is named as the sole beneficiary of a property (1.85 hectares) with a large homestead as a result of the death of a relative on 7/10/2010. The property is not used for commercial purposes and at the date of death, the property was valued at $1.45million. Settlement took place on 21/12/2010. After moving into the homestead shortly after taking ownership, she planned to take a one-year trip which she had been planning for some time in late 2011. The taxpayer felt that the homestead was far too large for her (she is single),…
- 2094 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
(Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings, Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham, was an unmarried couple, purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45,000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended, Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. Based on its determination that the property could not be split, the trial court ordered it to be sold. The trial court further ordered that $45,000 of the sale proceeds be paid to Mr. Hastings to reimburse…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
ANSWER: An estate held in tenancy by the entirety is limited to “homestead” property held by a husband and wife “during coverture.”…
- 1008 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…
- 1136 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
(2005). 2005 North Carolina code - general statutes § 41-2. Survivorship in joint tenancy defined; proviso as to partnership. Justia.com. Retrieved from…
- 1055 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Distinguish between a joint tenancy and a tenancy in common with regards to real property. What are the differences in the owners…
- 373 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to Cambridge dictionary, property is a building, area of land, object or objects that belong to someone (Property). Martin served many years on the force as a deputy and detective. He was an avid saver as well as a canny investor. Over the years, he has owned a share of mountain, coastal, and personal property in the state of North Carolina. Recently, Martin ran into some trouble to include: Peter’s son, Andrew taking out a personal loan and using his purported interest in the property as collateral; Otis firing a gun shot towards his head and mentioning that he’s lived on the mountain property openly and notoriously for approximately 20 years and that the property was his; his beach house property being taken by eminent domain;…
- 1722 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Each partner i. a joint tenant in all of the couple's property owned joint tenancy with rights…
- 3050 Words
- 13 Pages
Good Essays -
Walker, W. (1910). American Law of Real Estate Agency. New York: W.H. Anderson Co Publishers…
- 2364 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
This assignment will describe the role of energy in the body and explain the physiology of two named body system in relation to energy metabolism. It will explain where energy comes from, how the body uses energy, what is metabolism/catabolism and anabolism and also it will explain cellular respiration aerobic/anaerobic is.…
- 1101 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This research is conducted on The Theory of Title: When does title to real property transfer in the State of Arkansas. The research reviews general arguments regarding the three theories of the transfer of title of real property throughout the United States and specifically examines title transfer within the State of Arkansas. The State of Arkansas was selected as the example state because of its proximity to surrounding states of Tennessee, Mississippi, Missouri, and Okalahoma and the frequency in which individuals change their residency between the surrounding States. The research examines the type of real estate transfer theory practiced in the State of Arkansas by reviewing relevant case laws, mortgage practices and supplementary materials dealing with contract law and collection of rents. The literature tends to suggest that Arkansas does that follow any particular lien theory and utilizes a combination of each of the three lien theories.…
- 6452 Words
- 26 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Facts: M.R John Thomas verbally expressed on his death bed that after he died his wife should be permitted to remain on the premises of the matrimonial house which was in his name. The conditions were as follows; 1) She paid £1 per annum as rent, 2) She kept the premises in good condition and 3) She did not remarry. After M.R. Thomas died, the executors refused to sign the deed and tried to make MRS Thomas vacate the premises.MRS Thomas sued…
- 2087 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this essay, issues on equitable interests, fixtures and chattels and finder’s rights will be analysed. Carol will be advised accordingly.…
- 1764 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
unless such Deed is entered into and signed and a certificate of registration is issued. The Deed…
- 3012 Words
- 13 Pages
Good Essays -
4. Why would a couple want to hold property as “community property with the right of survivorship” as opposed just “community property”?…
- 2213 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays