In the 1970s, an investigator named John Endler traveled to Trinidad in the 1970s to study wild guppies. The guppies live in small streams that flow down the mountains from pool to pool. The experiment will take part on an online simulation of Endler's work. The group of members is responsible for collecting data, formulating a hypothesis, and running a series of experiments. They will find out about the interplay between natural selection and sexual selection in this wild population of guppies. They will ultimately find out the effects on the guppy population and their color distribution depending on the predator that lives in their environment. Endler wondered how the trade-off between attracting mates and affecting predators affects the coloration in male guppies. In pools that had few predator species, male guppies tended to be brightly colored, whereas predators are causing guppy populations to become drabber. This occurs because the predators are preying on the most brightly colored individuals and eliminating them from the gene pool. Therefore, guppy populations are evolving to more closely match, or stand out from their environment. Endler hypothesized that intense predation caused natural selection in male guppies, favoring the trait of drab coloration. He further tested his hypothesis by transferring brightly colors guppies to a pool with many predators. As he predicted, over time the transplanted guppy population became less brightly colored. Females tend to look for the bright colored male guppies in the pool and mate with them. This enables those males to have a higher probability of passing their genes on to their next generation. In the simulation, predators can dramatically influence the evolution of a population of guppies, but change does not occur quickly during the testing of one generation for each trial. (Before columns on graphs in the Data section of the simulation report) Scientists believe that they see changes in just a few generations, but more often there are significant trends when the simulation is ran after 7 generations or more. So, the ten generations for each different trial was calculated under the after columns of the graphs also in the Data section of the simulation. There were three predators involved in the experiment. There were Rivulus, Acara, and Cichlid predators. Also, there were different types of colored guppies in the gene pool. They are the brightest, bright, drab, and the drabbest colored guppies. There were certain trials that were tested to reveal the certain descriptions about the predators affecting the guppy population. Since the average male guppy in pool 1 is brightly colored and 30 Rivulus are living there, Rivulus do not prefer to eat brightly-colored guppies. Also, since pool 2 and pool 3 show differences in guppy appearances, Blue acara eat bright and drab colored guppies. Then, since pool 3 has few Rivulus and many Blue acara and Cichlids, and the average male guppy is like drab with drabbed spots, Blue acara and cichlids do not prefer drab colored guppies.
Problem/Objectives
The purpose of this activity is to analyze how guppy populations change over time. The simulation activity allows individuals to start with a pool of guppies and a choice of predators, in this case there are three. Certain predator or predators may be in the guppy population at the same time. Individuals will be able to watch what happens to the guppy population and how the introduction of predators can affect the guppy's appearance. The simulation will help a person understand what pressures drive guppy evolution. The field of population genetics examines the amount of genetic variation within populations and the processes that influence this variation. A population is defined as a group of interbreeding individuals that exist together at the same time. The guppy simulation represents this definition of a population because there are male guppies that mate with the females depending on which male guppies would still be alive from the different predators affecting them. There is also genetic variation, which refers to the degree of difference found among individuals, for instance in height, coat color, or other less observable traits. As I mentioned earlier, the brightest colored guppies have the best chance to mate, but also shrink in their population because predators feast on easy-to-see prey. The particular set of genes carried by an individual is known as their genotype, while all the genes in a population together comprise the "gene pool." The guppy simulation will be testing the coat color and the appearance of the guppies along with certain predators involved.
Introduction
Imagine being in a population where organisms are battling against one another and it is difficult to survive. Well, an English naturalist named, Charles Darwin, got credited with the idea of this description known as Natural Selection. Natural Selection is a major part of the main theory of evolution. Also, there is two major parts that go along with the theory of evolution. There is a pattern and a process of evolution. In the simulation to test the guppy population and its color distribution from a pond with predators, shows a process of Natural Selection. For guppies that were exposed to different predators, they needed to be tested to see which predator wants to eat what kind of guppy. The same predators were used for this simulation. The pattern of evolution is revealed by data and observations of environments to test a wide variety of scientific disciplines. There were different results for the different types of guppies in the population that were affected by the predators. The process of evolution deals with the observed pattern of change. The Rivulus predator likes to enjoy the drab colored guppies, the Acara likes to enjoy the bright and drab colored guppies and the Cichlid likes to enjoy the bright and drabbed colored guppies as well, for their food source. The power of evolution as a unifying theory is its ability to explain and connect a variety array of observations about the living world. An individual is able to explain the changes that occurred when the different predators were added to the guppy population. He can tell which predator preferred a certain guppy and what happened when two or all three predators were added at a time. This all ties into the main discussion of evolution, which is the change in the genetic composition of a population from generation to generation. It only affects a change of a population because organisms cannot evolve. It can also be said in broad terms as “change over time,” but that is referred to as Descent of Modification. Whether it is Lamarck's theory that evolution is driven by an innate tendency towards greater complexity, Darwin's theory of natural selection, or the belief that the evolution of plant and animal life is controlled by a higher being, the process of evolution cannot be denied. Archaeological investigations have proven that species evolve over time, but the unanswered questions are "How?" and "Why?" The answer lies in Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. Darwin’s theory of evolution entails the following fundamental ideas. The first three ideas were already under discussion among earlier naturalists working on what they called the species problem, as Darwin began his research. Darwin’s original contributions were the mechanism of natural selection and bountiful amounts of evidence for evolutionary change from many sources. He also provided thoughtful explanations of the consequences of evolution for our true understanding of the history of life and modern biological diversity. First, species (populations of interbreeding organisms) change over time and space, as I mentioned earlier. The representatives of species living today differ from those that lived in the recent past, and populations in different geographic regions today differ slightly in form or behavior, not just the guppy population. These differences extend into the fossil record, which provides full support for this claim. Secondly, all organisms share common ancestors with other organisms. Over time, populations may divide into different species, which share a common ancestral population. Far enough back in time, any pair of organisms shares a common ancestor. For example, humans shared a common ancestor with chimpanzees about eight million years ago, with whales about 60 million years ago, and with kangaroos over 100 million years ago. The shared ancestry explains the similarities of organisms that are classified together. Their similarities reflect the inheritance of traits from a common ancestor. Lastly, evolutionary change is gradual and slow in Darwin’s view. This claim was supported by the long episodes of gradual change in organisms in the fossil record and the fact that no naturalist had observed the sudden appearance of a new species in Darwin’s time. Since then, biologists and paleontologists have documented a broad spectrum of slow to rapid rates of evolutionary change within lineages. This links to Darwin’s theory. Darwin’s process of natural selection has seven components. They include overproduction, variation, change in environment, struggle for existence, survival of the fittest, inheritance of “selected” features, and new species that are better adapted to the new environment. In variation, organisms, within populations, exhibit individual variation in appearance and behavior. These variations may involve body size, hair color, facial markings, voice properties, or number of offspring. (Variation) The bright colored male guppies reproduce more because the females are attracted to them and they can also be hunted by predators, since they stick out like a sore thumb to them. So, variation is involved. On the other hand, some traits show little to no variation among individuals—for example, number of eyes in vertebrates. In inheritance, some traits are consistently passed on from parent to offspring. Such traits are heritable, whereas other traits are strongly influenced by environmental conditions and show weak heritability. (Inheritance of “selected” features) The bright guppies can pass their bright colored coat trait to their offspring. In the high rate of population growth (Overproduction), most populations have more offspring each year than local resources can support, which leads to a struggle for resources. Each generation experiences substantial mortality. Also involved in populations are differential survival and reproduction, what Darwin called the (Struggle for existence). These compose of individuals that are possessing traits well suited for the struggle for local resources and that will contribute more offspring to the next generation. From one generation to the next, the struggle for resources will favor individuals with some variations over others and thereby change the frequency of traits within the population. This process as mentioned before is natural selection. The traits that render an advantage to those individuals who leave more offspring are called adaptations. (Survival of the Fittest) In order for natural selection to operate on a trait, the trait must possess heritable variation and must confer an advantage in the competition for resources. If any of these requirements does not occur, then the trait does not experience natural selection. We now know that such traits may change by other evolutionary mechanisms that have been discovered since Darwin’s time. Natural selection operates by a qualified advantage, not an absolute standard of design. In Charles Darwin’s book, On the Origin of Species, 1859, it says “…as natural selection acts by competition for resources, it adapts the inhabitants of each country only in relation to the degree of perfection of their associates.” (Changes in environment) The bright guppies that have the strong heritable trait can use the females to a certain degree until a predator comes out and takes the population of them out.
Around the twentieth century, genetics was integrated with Darwin’s mechanism, allowing us to evaluate natural selection as the differential survival and reproduction of genotypes, corresponding to particular phenotypes. Natural selection can only work on existing variation within a population. Such variations arise by mutation, which is known as a change in some part of the genetic code for a specific trait. Mutations arise by chance and without foresight for the potential advantage or disadvantage of the mutation. In other words, variations do not arise because they are needed. So, when traits of a population differ significantly from the earlier population and can no longer reproduce with the earlier population, then it is known as a new species. (New Species) There is also a theory that ties into natural selection and it is called sexual selection. Many may ponder the question, “Why are the sexes different in some species?” Darwin suggested that many reproductive characteristics of males and females arise by means of sexual selection. He recognized two different but complementary aspects of sexual selection. First of all, selection may be the result of competition among individuals of one sex for access to the other. The brightest male guppies can pass their trait from generation to generation if they can mate with the female guppies in time before the predators come back for them. Alternatively, selection could take the form of choices made by one sex among individuals of the opposite sex. However, if the brightest colored male guppies diminish, the females will try to go to the other bright or other guppies that have some color on them. Next, if the colored males are eliminated then there is no choice but to mate with the drab guppies. After all, the females choose the brighter guppies to mate with because they may have better genes than the other guppies. They do not do it consciously, but if they choose the flashier male, then that male’s group of traits will be found in the female’s sons. Females put more energy into reproduction and reproduce less frequently than males. So, it is more likely for males to engage in competition with other males and for females to be the more selective sex. However, there are instances where males are the fastidious sex. We expect males to become deliberate if females differ in their quality, and males are confronted either with limited resources for reproduction or with the opportunity to choose among several females at any one time. Among the species, where egg number is a function of body size, there may commonly be opportunities for males to choose among females, since a male mating with a large female will father more young than one who spends the same time and energy mating with a smaller female. In many other fish, productiveness is a function of size and growth that is inexact, suggesting that these opportunities occur frequently.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In this exercise we will examine the effects of different kinds of potential evolutionary factors on the genetic makeup of simple, model populations.…
- 1184 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This experiment is being done to study natural selection, speciation, and human evolution. Although no humans are being observed in this lab the concept of evolution is going to be looked up. The speciation is to see if by different modifications in the environment create a new species of finches. If no new species develop or the finches do not evolve to the changes in their surroundings will natural selection happen and will we no longer have finches on this island?…
- 5207 Words
- 21 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In a large, sexually reproducing population, the frequency of an allele changes from 0.6 to 0.2. From this change, one can most logically assume that, in this environment,…
- 1518 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of the research was to formulate a question and develop a hypothesis based on the variations observed between two populations of threespine stickleback, in order to gain a better understanding of natural selection and evolution. Measurements were taken of the number of scutes, ventral length and standard length in Population A. Population B data was provided by instructor. Four null hypotheses were formed on each of the measurements taken, the last hypothesis being no difference between populations. Data was collected from classmates and then compiled together into an excel spreadsheet. Using the spreadsheet, determined confidences intervals and looked for overlapping in the populations. From the confidence interval, it was concluded that there was a significant change between the populations. All of the hypotheses were rejected except for one. Thus proving phenotypic variation and natural selection occurred.…
- 3141 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Lake Malawi’s cichlid male population of fish are tested on their ability to build bowers to attract the female population. Altering this extended phenotype, or ability to build bowers resulted in no change of mating, but males that built successful bowers showed to be less aggressive with other males in the population. This is important in maintaining polymorphic populations (Magalhaes, 2014). In my self-created scenario, the focus is on the small male population of cichlid fish. The male cichlid fish ability to build successful bowers is dominant while not building successful bowers is recessive within the population. After a recent hurricane wiped out the cichlid population food source, the male population has been tested on their ability to find other food for the female population. The ability includes better strength and speed. Female cichlid fish find this new ability to more attractive than building successful bowers because of this environmental change. The purpose of this study is to determine natural selection and to see if the male population of cichlid fish will be altered due to the changes in their environment.…
- 938 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
We created a small reservoir for this experiment to take place using petri dishes. We used brown paper as a dark side of a petri dish and a whit sheet for the light side. We placed the planarians in the middle of the white petri dish for our trials. in the end of the experiment we found out that more planarians went to the dark side instead of remaining in the white side. From the research I have done on platyhelminthes I concluded that the results came to be by natural selection, and how organisms camouflage themselves to hide from predators by blending in with there surroundings. This idea is supported in the observations I made because since the planarians were darkly colored they moved to a spot with more dark colors instead of being in a place with no color(the white side) and being very visible. My hypothesis, If the Planaria are placed on the white side then they will move to the dark side, was supported in this experiment. it was supported because the majority of planaria moved to the dark side instead of staying in the white side. Even though we made few errors in our project, our results should not be changed so much. If I could have changed the experiment in one way, I would have chosen to use a stopwatch instead of a analog clock to keep the time. I believe my partners in the grouped participated in the experiment equally. I also believe that each person did the same…
- 1266 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Feedback on Your Choices in The World of Mammals: A Role-Playing Simulation on Choosing a CIO…
- 825 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This hands-on laboratory exercise is a highly simplified model that attempts to simulate evolution by means of natural selection. Predators will act as agents of selection on their prey, a species whose members vary in color. We will assume that color is an inherited trait. Small squares of paper will represent the prey, which will be spread out of a piece of printed colored fabric that will serve as the habitat. The predators (you) will prey upon the population, with the surviving members reproducing and passing along the genes for color.…
- 776 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
My hypothesis for this experiment was that if there are more children per generation, then it will increase the rate of evolution. I believed this to be the case because there is more opportunity for mutation and for diversification in offspring, if there is more offspring. This could be easily backed up with a basic knowledge of statistics. The second experiment, was a basic comparison to the first test. It was to see if the fertility rate and a simplified gene code would get a different result. For this experiment, my hypothesis was that if the adaptation is more simplistic, then it will increase to rate of evolution. I believed this to be true because with a less complex adaptation, there is more chance that it will reach the genetic code needed. We discussed this idea in class. This can be backed up by an analogy that Dawkins made. This analogy is that it would be almost impossible for airplane parts that were sitting in a junk yard to be blown up by the wind and be put together to create an actual airplane (Dawkins, 1996). Why is this? This is mostly because it is an incredibly complex structure. As stated by Dawkins it would take probably the entire existence of the Earth for the probability of that event to…
- 1253 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the story “The Giraffe” by Mauro Senesi the giraffe is given human like characteristics such as feeling cold, getting frightened and crying. When first brought into the town the giraffe is an unusual sight for everyone. There are people that appreciate the giraffe like the boys and some freak out when they see the “beast”. The giraffe starts to feel cold when the story progresses into night time. “When all the shutters had been closed with a bang, a tremor seemed to pass down the animal's long legs” (Senesi 30). According to Rolandino the giraffe is feeling cold, which illustrates the human characteristic that is given to the giraffe in the story. Humans usually feel cold as well, but the people in the town have shelters to provide them with…
- 661 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To begin this experiment, go to the Evolution Lab located with the University of Phoenix student website. Once at the lab’s page, click Start Lab. This will take you to an applet to view and change the inputs for variables. For this experiment, the variable inputs on Darwin Island will be changed and Wallace’s inputs will remain as a constant variable. The only variable that will be the same for both islands is the heritability. The following table shows what the final numbers for each variable are. After changing Darwin Islands’ inputs, you may now run the experiment. Darwin’s Island sized was changed to 1.0 km, double what Wallace Island is. Some consistency was wanted, so inheritability remained at 1.00 and Darwin’s variance of beak size went up to 1.00 instead of Wallace’s 0.7. The initial beak sized was increased by one inch on Darwin’s Island. Birds with the best-suited bodies and beaks for the particular environment survive and pass along the…
- 686 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Complete the worksheet writing 100- to 200-word short answers for each question. Format your references consistent with APA guidelines.…
- 746 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
The finches on Darwin and Wallace Islands feed on seeds produced by plants growing on these islands. There are three categories of seeds: soft seeds, produced by plants that do well under wet conditions; seeds that are intermediate in hardness, produced by plants that do best under moderate precipitation; and hard seeds, produced by plants that dominate in drought conditions. Evolution Lab is based on a model for the evolution of quantitative traits–characteristics of an individual that are controlled by large numbers of genes. These traits are studied by looking at the statistical distribution of the trait in populations and investigating how the distribution changes from one generation to the next. For the finches in EvolutionLab, the depth of the beak is the quantitative trait. You will investigate how this trait changes under different biological and environmental conditions.…
- 4577 Words
- 19 Pages
Good Essays -
The object of this experiment is to determine how changing the size of the beak of a finch will affect the population as well as the growth rate of the finch’s beak. The reason for the experiment is to evaluate evolution and how it affects the finch’s population, and how natural selection is always present in life. In this experiment I will show that the finch will continue to evolve until its beak has reached the optimal size for sustaining life, when changing the beak size to a much larger size we will see that the finch will have no need for further evolution of its beak and that its population will become much more stable and consistent throughout the years.…
- 579 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
You are a scientific journalist and your editor has asked you to prepare an article explaining how a particular (you choose) species has changed over time. The editor requests that you explain the process of inheritance and link the changes observed over a number of years to the Theory of Natural Selection. You are also required to hypothesize on the potential changes of the population of your chosen species in the future justified on your research or findings.…
- 953 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays