Objective
To investigate the effect on friction of the following factors: 1. normal force that presses the two surfaces together 2. materials that the two surfaces are made of 3. area in contact of the two surfaces
Apparatus
Rectangular wooden block
Wooden plank
Glass plate
Plastic plate
String
Scissors
Jack
Spring balance
Electronic balance
Half-meter rule
Retort stand and clamp
G-clamp
Trolley[pic]2
Standard weights (100g)[pic]5
Theory
Frictional forces act along the common surfaces between two bodies in contact so as to resist the relative motion of the two bodies. The frictions involved form an action-reaction pair.
A horizontal force F is applied to the wooden plank. As the plank is at rest, the friction force[pic] is equal to F and directs to the opposite side to resist the motion. The friction is static as there is no motion.
If F is increased, [pic]will also increase until it reaches the limiting static friction[pic]. Once the body starts to move, the frictional force would fall to a smaller value[pic], which remains constant even the applied force F is increased further.
In this experiment, the effects of the normal force, the materials of the surfaces and the contacting areas on [pic] and [pic] are to be investigated.
Procedure
1. The mass and the areas of the three faces of the rectangular wooden block were measured by using the electronic balance and half-meter rule respectively.
Effect of the normal force on friction
2. The apparatus was set up as shown below.
3. The wooden plank (together with the two trolleys underneath) was slowly pushed away from the spring balance. When the block started to slide, the spring balance was read quickly. The maximum value was the limiting static friction[pic]. The wooden plank was keep pushing to maintain a steady sliding and then the spring balance that indicated the kinetic friction[pic] was read again. 4. The measurement of [pic] and [pic] was repeated two more times to get the average values. 5. A 100g standard weight was added on the wooden block each times to increase the normal force. Then the measurement was repeated.
Effect of materials on friction
6. The wooden plank was replaced with the glass plate. The same face of the wooden block and two 100g standard weights were used. The measurement was repeated two more times. 7. The glass plate was replaced with the plastic plate and the measurement was repeated two more times.
Effect of area on friction
8. Different faces of the wooden block were used. The wooden plank and two 100g standard weights were used.
Data and Data Analysis
Wooden block:
Mass = 359.2g [pic] 0.05g
Area of face 1 = 20 cm[pic]7 cm = 140 [pic]
Area of face 2 = 7 cm[pic]3.6 cm = 25.2 [pic]
Area of face 3 = 20 cm[pic]3.6 cm = 72 [pic]
Effect of the normal force on friction
Surfaces in contact: wood on wood
Area of the surface in contact A = 140 [pic]
| |Normal force|Limiting static friction [pic]/N |Kinetic friction [pic]/N |
| |R/N | | |
| | |Trial 1 |
| |Trial 1 |Trial 2 |Trial 3 |Mean |Trial 1 |Trial 2 |Trial 3 |Mean |
|Wood on wood |2.2 |2.3 |2.4 |2.3 |1.1 |1.1 |1.2 |1.1333 |
|Wood on glass |3.3 |3.5 |3.4 |3.4 |2.2 |2.1 |1.9 |2.0667 |
|Wood on plastic |2.8 |3.2 |2.9 |2.9667 |2.1 |2.1 |2.3 |2.1667 |
By [pic], we have
[pic]=[pic] and [pic]=[pic] ➢ For wood on wood:
[pic]=[pic]=0.412 and [pic]=[pic]=0.203 ➢ For wood on glass:
[pic]=[pic]=0.610 and [pic]=[pic]=0.371 ➢ For wood and plastic:
[pic]=[pic]=0.532 and [pic]=[pic]=0.389
➢ Order of the friction: wood on glass[pic] wood and plastic[pic] wood on wood ➢ Force of friction varies with different surfaces in contact if all other factors are kept constant.
Effect of area on friction
Surfaces in contact: wood on wood
Normal force R =
|Area in contact A/[pic] |Limiting static friction [pic]/N |Kinetic friction [pic]/N |
| |Trial 1 |Trial 2 |Trial 3 |Mean |Trial 1 |Trial 2 |Trial 3 |Mean |
|140 |2.2 |2.3 |2.4 |2.3 |1.1 |1.1 |1.2 |1.1333 |
|72 |1.9 |2.1 |2.1 |2.0333 |1.2 |1.2 |1.2 |1.2 |
|25.2 |1.9 |2.0 |2.0 |1.9667 |1.0 |1.0 |1.1 |1.0333 |
By [pic], we have
[pic]=[pic] and [pic]=[pic] ➢ For area in contact = 140[pic]
[pic]=[pic]=0.412 and [pic]=[pic]=0.203 ➢ For area in contact = 72[pic]
[pic]=[pic]=0.365 and [pic]=[pic]=0.215 ➢ For area in contact = 25.2[pic]:
[pic]=[pic]=0.353 and [pic]=[pic]=0.185
➢ Both [pic] and [pic] for the three faces of the wooden block are similar. ➢ The area of contact of sliding surface does not influence the force of friction if all other factors are kept constant.
Errors
| | |Systematic Error |Random Error |
|1 |The applied forces on the wooden plank may not be constant. | |√ |
|2 |Human error in reading the scale of the spring balance |√ | |
|3 |The string is not horizontal under tension. | |√ |
|4 |The wooden block and the plank are not completely in contact. | |√ |
|5 |The surfaces of the wooden, plastic and glass planks may not be | |√ |
| |perfectly even. | | |
Discussion
Advantage of pulling the wooden plank, instead of pulling the wooden block with the spring balance.
If we pull the wooden block with the spring balance, the applied force F will be measured. However, we can only read [pic] when the block starts to move. As [pic] is independent of F, [pic] will remain constant even [pic] is increased further. Therefore, we cannot read [pic] from the spring balance but the applied force which is lager than the [pic]. However, [pic] and [pic] can be measured directly by pulling the wooden plank instead of pulling the wooden block with the spring balance.
Pushing a car
Both [pic] and [pic] are independent of the surface area of the body and [pic] is independent of the relative velocity of the body.
Since F=[pic]N and [pic][pic][pic], the force needed to start the motion is lager than the force needed to keep the object in uniform motion. Therefore, it is more difficult to start the motion but once the car is moving, it is relatively easier to maintain its motion in pushing a car.
Design of the braking system in bicycles
In the design of the braking system in bicycles, the weight of the bicycles and the coefficient of friction of material of the wheels should be maximized to achieve a larger frictional force. By F=[pic]N, both [pic] and N increase, the frictional force will increase.
Conclusion
The greater the normal force, the greater the friction if all other factors are kept constant. Also, force of friction varies with different surfaces in contact if all other factors are kept constant. However, the area of contact of sliding surface does not influence the force of friction if all other factors are kept constant.
-----------------------
3
1
2
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Zero the LabQuest 2 and then drag the block with one of the slotted masses at a constant speed along the table. Place the force in Newtons, which is what is given by the LabQuest 2, under the “friction for the sandpaper block” column on the data table. Do this for the other five slotted masses as well.…
- 471 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
1) Block B in Fig. 6-31 weighs 603 N. The coefficient of static friction between block and table is 0.32; angle θ is 33°; assume that the cord between B and the knot is horizontal. Find the maximum weight of block A for which the system will be stationary.…
- 313 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
By measuring the friction and μ of a container and change different variables including mass, surface and gradient, get causes of the change of friction and μ.…
- 824 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
6. Connect the spring scale to the wooden block and steadily drag the block up the incline plane.…
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This lab was pretty successful in the end. The % errors were only 1.8% and 25.1%. The 1.8% came from the kinetic friction, which was likely due to either round off errors or data that was slightly off. The 25.1% from the static friction can be due to a number of factors. The angle error is around 4 degrees less, so the angle could be a result of a different, extra frictional force during the experiment, which stops the block from moving. The experiment does not need much improvement since it ran pretty well. The picture below describes the force needed to pull the cart. Between A and B, is the force needed to build up to the maximum static frictional force. The peak, B, is the maximum static frictional force. The flat line is the kinetic frictional force needed to pull the cart. The normal force affects both frictional forces because it is the normal force multiplied by the coefficient of friction to get the frictional force. The static friction is always slightly higher than the kinetic friction, but seem to increase at the same rate.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Dynamic friction (aka sliding friction or kinetic friction): when dry friction acts between two surfaces that are moving relative to each other…
- 3223 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
What is the frictional force acting on the 43 kg mass? Answer in units of N 032 10.0 points Two crates are touching, resting on a practically frictionless surface. If you apply a force F with your hand against the larger crate of mass M , both crates accelerate across the surface, and remain in contact. a F′ F M m Which statement is wrong?…
- 5122 Words
- 42 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A hammer drives a nail into a piece of wood. Identify an action-reaction pair in this situation.…
- 1653 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A car is parked on a hill. In order to keep the car from rolling downhill, how great must the static friction acting on the car be? (Hint: Picture each scenario in your mind)…
- 832 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
10. Two children push on a heavy crate that rests on a basement floor. One pushes horizontally with a force of 150 N and the other pushes in the same direction with a force of 180 N. The crate remains stationary. Show that the force of friction between the crate and the floor is 330 N.…
- 1913 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Figure 3 - A graph at a height of 0.85 meters with X Position (m) Vs. Time (s). At 0.75 meters With a kinetic energy of 0.081 J, the wooden friction block reached a maximum velocity of 0.911 m/s at a falling distance of 0.75 meters. This velocity increase was consistent throughout the drop. Figure 4 - A graph at a height of 0.75 meters with X Position (m) Vs.…
- 865 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The size of frictional forces can be reduced bystreamlining the object or lubricating any moving parts.…
- 380 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Abstract In this experiment, we test factors which effect friction. We pulled a wood block across a surface to determine whether the surface area of the block or the type of surface effects friction. We found that the surface area of the block did not change the coefficient of kinetic friction, while the types of materials in contact were directly related to the coefficient of kinetic friction. (66)…
- 936 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There was a transfer of momentum from the car to the track during the trials. Every time the cart would come in contact with the barrier the track would shift slightly. Also the barrier would move back and forth when the cart would hit it. There is also some friction on the cart that cannot be accounted for. When the spring on the cart compresses against the barrier, energy escapes the system causing the kinetic energy in the backward direction to be less than the forward direction.…
- 3118 Words
- 13 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Materials Used: Materials used in this experiment was a regular shaped object and irregular shaped object and a ruler to take the measurements of the object. A graduated cylinder and electric beam balance were used to measure the volumes and masses of the object. As well 5-20% concentrated were used as well.…
- 1486 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays