Preview

subsidy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
subsidy
Farm subsidies are intended to alleviate farmer poverty, but the majority of subsidies go to commercial farms with average incomes of $200,000 and net worths of nearly $2 million.
Farm subsidies are intended to raise farmer incomes by remedying low crop prices. Instead, they promote overproduction and therefore lower prices further.
Farm subsidies are intended to help struggling family farmers. Instead, they harm them by excluding them from most subsidies, financing the consolidation of family farms, and raising land values to levels that prevent young people from entering farming.
Farm subsidies are intended to be consumer-friendly and taxpayer-friendly. Instead, they cost Americans billions each year in higher taxes and higher food costs.

The Government's Influence on the Cost of Food
- Food Subsidies (1995-2009)
#1 - corn subsidies ($4.0 billion)
#2 - cotton subsidies ($2.3 billion)
#3 - wheat subsidies ($2.2 billion)
#4 - soybean subsidies ($1.1 billion)
#5 - dairy program subsidies ($1.1 billion)
#6 - fruits and vegetables ($825 million)
- How U.S. corn crops are used (2008)
2.7% - 327 million bu. - Human consumption - grits, corn flour, corn meal, beverage alcohol
7.8% - 943 million bu. - Production of starch, corn oil, sweeteners (HFCS, etc.)
15.3% - 1.85 billion bu. Exports
43.3% - 5.25 billion bu. Livestock feed
30.1% - 3.65% billion bu. Ethanol production
The real cost of cheap food
- Historical cost of food (price of food relative to price of all items)
Note: The ration to Consumer Price Index for food to the Consumer Price Index for all items less food (base period 1982 - 84)
1952 ~ 1.11
1962 ~ 1.03
1972 ~ 0.80
1973 ~ 1.15
1982 ~ 1.02
1992 ~ 0.50
2002 ~ 0.50
- Obesity rate vs. cost of food (U.S. obesity rate, food costs as% of disposable income)
Obesity rate: 1971 - 14.5%, 1999 - 30.9%, 2008/2009 - 26.7%
Food costs: 1971 - 13.4%, 1999 - 10.2%, 2008/2009 - 9.6% - Overweight Americans in 1950s
33% - overweight, 10% -

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Corn production has gone up due to the help of ammonia fertilizer. Corn farms do not practice organic agriculture. Crop yield has gone up four times compared to Ian and Curt’s ancestors in the early 1900’s with the help of fertilizers and herbicides to kill the weeds. The government subsidizes large farms to plant on more land and to buy out their neighbors if they do not want to grow crops. Farmers get rewarded for overproduction of cheap corn which keeps the production of corn going on full blast. Majority of the corn produced gets fed to animals or us in the form of high fructose corn syrup which is empty calories. Due to consolidation of family farms into large farming operations, the consumers are harmed while the cooperation benefit because they get cheap corn produced in surplus to turn into high fructose corn syrup or feed to sell to livestock producers. Consumers are harmed because more high fructose corn syrup is being produced and put into the foods we consume on a daily basis. Corn is in everything that we consume, such as sodas and hamburgers. High fructose corn syrup has adverse effects such as a higher risk of acquiring type 2 diabetes and obesity. The table sugar consumption has decreased, but high fructose corn syrup consumption has increased by 30% because it is cheaper to buy and produce. In the late 1980’s high fructose corn syrup has taken over half of the sweetener…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The percentage of principle farm operators 65 years or older has increased almost ten percent since 1969. In 1935, the number of farms in the USA was 6.8 million and the population 127 million. Nowadays, there are over 313 million people living in the USA and 2.2 million farms (numbers from an USDA research). We can clearly see that the new generation is not thinking about improving the quality of our meals; it's not profitable. So, let's support the small farmers concerned with the land and the animals; like Joel Salatin in Michael Pollan's book.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    industrial food. Most organic farmers receive no subsidies. If you look at the food system we…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Farmers received benefit payments in return for reducing acreage or cutting production where surpluses existed…

    • 3035 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the Dust Bowl the US has put policies in place to help farmers and other crop producers. A policy that has been put into place is the 2014 Farm Bill. The 2014 farm Bill was enacted on February 7, 2014. This Bill is being helped to be put into full effect by NRCS or Natural Resources Conservation Services. They help by offering financial assistance and easement programs and partnership. The financial assistance and technical assistance is offered “to help agricultural producers make and maintain conservation improvements on their land.” The easement programs are offered to “eligible landowners to conserve working agricultural lands, wetlands, grasslands and forest lands.” The partnership aspect is that “NRCS works with partners to leverage additional conservation assistance for agricultural producers and landowners in priority conservation areas.” These programs are in effect but could be easily ignored and some crop producers will do whatever it takes to make a profit. Even if that means breaking the rules of the 2014 Farm…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How many times has the US population heard that large farms are more productive than small farms? The public perception is heavily influenced by the media. The most common stance on small farm economics is usually sided with the large corporate farms, especially in large court battles. Here in the United States, the question was asked more than a half-century ago: what does the growth of large-scale, industrial agriculture mean for rural towns and communities? Small family owned and operated farms are still alive in America today through opposition to factory farms, incentives from the United States government, the controversy over animal rights, and the awareness of the slow food movement.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hoppe Robert A., Korb, Penni; O’Donoghue, Erik J. & Banker, David E. Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: Family Farm Report, 2007 Edition / EIB-24, Economic Research Service/USDA.…

    • 3120 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agriculture plays a crucial role in the life of an economy; governmental support programs provide U.S. families with…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate farms are mass producing crops and meat, much more than the small family farms. In one year a corporate farm has hundreds to thousands of head of beef cattle and produce about 28.5 billion pounds of beef. Small family farms have anywhere from 10 to 25 head of beef cattle and sell a couple to family and family friends, also keeping one or so to themselves. Second, corporate farms are using more acres with larger equipment which is and can be a huge issue compared to small family farms. Using bigger machines makes cultivating, sowing, and harvesting easier but without rotating the crops into different fields each year the amount of minerals goes down and erosion goes up. Small family farms rotate their crops almost every year creating more minerals and less erosion in the land. Rotating crops lets the minerals to come back so that the land does not become an area where nothing can grow. Finally, small farms create jobs for many without jobs compared to corporate farms in which they are larger but do not create jobs. On a corporate farm it takes about 2 people to plant, fertilize, harvest, and transport about 5,000 acres of say corn. On a small family farms it takes about 3 to 4 in order to get this all done on about 300 acres of corn. The difference? The machines that the corporate farms use are huge machines that can conquer a field in less than half of the time…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This acquisition is false, the factory farmers do not get paid unless they are treating the animals with care. One of the reasons why someone pursues farming is because they have the desire to be with animals. According to David Leyonhjelm, the factory farms are more humane than the small scale farms. If the animals were not being treated with the proper care, then the animals would drop like flies. The livestock in the factory farms is protected from wind, snow, rain, heat and cold, and safe from the wild animals. Placing the animals in the factory farms allows the breeding process to be less stressful and the farmers will be able to take care and protect the young animals. While they are being protected in the warehouses, the animals are given a constant balanced diet and they are provided with plenty of fresh water. Factory farms are there to protect the livestock and still treat them with care while providing quality meat and dairy for the consumers. The last thing the factories want to do is cause the livestock discomfort, stress, and diseases. The factory farms are equipped with technology and farmers that can do everything they can to ensure they lead a stress and disease-free…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to be able to sell food cheaper we have begun adding chemicals like GMOs and pesticides to our crops and containing our animals through the use of AFOs. Over the past century American agriculture has dramatically changed due to the fact that small, commercial farms are finding it harder and harder to compete with large-scale (mostly indoor) animal feeding operations (AFOs). Agricultural occupations such as farming often do not offer economic prosperity, thus pushing workers to seek financial advances. Many farmers look to GMOs and AFOs because they provide an easier way to gain surplus in the product. Pesticides and steroids are examples, as they alter growth providing larger products faster. Knowing these practices have major negative effects, farmers still use these outlets as a means to gain advantage over other competitors. Centner sees a worsening situation, as individual farmers are finding it necessary to alter their practices and hurting the environment for financial reasons. An example of this is the new terminator gene spoken of on pg. 86, which is said to be more harmful to the environment than helpful. Since farmers grow so much food using pesticides and GMOs, there is talk to find a way to limit production, allowing for conservation. Programs are being looked into where we can pay farmers through grants and…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pastor Rick Warren

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a. I don’t think small farms deserve more or less when it comes to collecting subsidies. Of course larger farmers are going to receive more. They produce more product therefore they’re at a higher risk. It is a shame that small farms don’t feel they receive enough but in reality, the larger the farm, the more they produce. Organic foods, Fruits, Vegetables, Grains, etc… are always going to be at a high demand. With that being said, larger farms who produce more should receive a higher pay out.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Farm Subsidies

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The current Farm Bill is set to expire in 2012 and in this climate of spending reductions and budget balancing, there has been a lot of talk about reducing or eliminating many farm subsidies. The purpose of this paper and my research is to see what if any impact the elimination of the commodity subsidies would have on the local farming economy. The objectives of this paper are to examine the history of farm subsidies, the current Farm Bill, various commodity subsidy programs, criticisms of the current programs, and get a local perspective of the current effectiveness of the subsidy programs.…

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The state of Iowa has many farmers. Iowa is known for thier crops, but what if the farmers are not taking the responiblity of taking care of the crops or are just plan out lieing. Some, not saying all are feeding us “the world” with facts that are not even correct, or do not seem right. Farming is hard, everyone should know that, not just anyone can say they wanna be a farmer it takes absolute dedication, money, and a fair amount of luck. It takes long days and long hours to farm,if they are leasing some land, they need to have equipment, some farmhand, seeds, and of course water!…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

     Are subsidies being recast clearly to promote organic or do main subsidies continue in…

    • 7567 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics