Summarize The Relationship Between The Presidency And Congress

Since the beginning, the relationship between the presidency and Congress has been a difficult one. The framers put into place a system of checks and balances to help make sure that there would always be such a struggle. The distinctive “tension between one branch writing laws and budgets and the other branch carrying out the laws and spending the money has been” (Professional Development) an essential characteristic of the American government. Although the Constitution gives Congress, the power to declare war and omit money for troops and weapons, presidents stay given a broad leeway to defend the nation and wage war. Presidents have stretched this power to move without congressional approval through military interventions.
If there’s a collision
For example, only the Senate can approve “treaties so if a president negotiates a treaty, and the Senate does not like the treaty, it will not pass.” (eNotes) The president and Congress both have a role in foreign policy according to the constitution. Each has remained given specific powers and has assumed more authority either through example or by relying on other constitutional responsibilities. Since the president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces where he negotiates treaties, he can appoint diplomats to represent the United States
If there will be any collision between the President and Congress, they can impeach the president, but the complaint is that the president should stay involved in a decision that’s illegal and not for the American people. “Throughout U.S. history, presidents have used their power as head of the military to involve the nation in many conflicts abroad without a formal declaration of war by Congress, and they have found other ways to get around imposed limitations on their ability to give direction to American foreign policy.” (Making Foreign