In the essay " 'Indians ': Textualism, Morality, and the Problem of History" written by Jane Tompkins, an English professor at Duke University, the author criticized the history writers and described the issue of problems that are often created by different perspectives from the history on the topic, European -Indian relation, that cannot be determined from right or wrong. Many problems contain one main fact behind it. However, people have different perspectives of that particular fact, and those perspectives are not always the same. These differences have created textualism problems for the later generations, which make it very difficult for us to learn about history. Throughout this essay, Tompkins main goal is to send a message to history writers that if they can 't formulate the problems of history with their moral decisions, they will never be able to resolve those moral problems. As a matter of fact, those same moral problems will be repeated in the future. Therefore, the study of history will be worthless. As a student loving to learn about history, by reading Tompkins ' essay I feel like students are being misinterpreted about their country 's history due to the biases of historians writing history themselves. In my opinion, if historians cannot see the facts behind history, how can later generation students find out those facts and make an ethical judgment about our history itself.
As a kid, Tompkins learned from school about the facts about Indians who made her feel like they were inferiors to her because of their ignorance of the value in the Manhattan Island they sold to Peter Minuit. In order to be like them, she wanted to pursue an "exciting, romantic life in the forest" (Tompkins 102). She was proud to be living on a land that these adventurous native people used to live. When Tompkins decided to do a research about the relationship between Indians and the European settlers, one of her main question changed from what happened to the relationship between them to what are the real facts of history based on the accounts given by different historians.
Although there is only one main fact about European - Indian relation, there are many different reports about their past relationships. Tompkins decided to go from secondary to primary researches with a hope of finding more reliable sources of information about European - Indian relation. She ends up with all of the biased accounts, which contain different perspectives of each writers and not facts. As a result, she wanted to end her research in "relativism" (115). Even though she came across contradictory in her researches, by using relativism she can decide for herself which information is well supported her reasoning. She then can eliminate the extreme biases, and combine all these perspectives together to form a comprehensive description of history.
Tompkins ' first secondary research was about Perry Miller. Through his book, _Errand into the Wilderness_, Tompkins criticized Miller for using white supremacy when he writes about the history of America as well as Central Africa. According to Miller, the jungle in Central Africa and the "vacant wilderness" of America are mirror images of one another (104). Under his eyes, he can 't see the Blacks and Native Americans populating in these two countries. Not only Miller but Governor Winthrop also considers Indians as non-existence. In addition to the first secondary research, Tompkins found to be very disappointed when three out of other four historians have used Eurocentric views to write about the history of America. Alden Vaughan referred Indians as inferior human compared to the Puritans because of their cultural backwardness. Francis Jennings blamed the settlers for their exploitation on Indians. And Charles Hudson used his European economical view to explain for the fur trade between European and Indians, which had led to massacre of Indians. In contrast to Vaughan, Jennings, and Hudson, Calvin Martin, the author of "Keepers of the game," has used his Amerindian views to explain the fur trade. He argued the act of exploiting the animals is not caused by Indians ' desire for the fancy goods sold by Europeans but a spiritual game between them and the animals.
To explain for the different descriptions about the history of European-Indian relation, John Higham states that "the sociocultural upheaval of the sixties" (106) has caused the change of the ways people view and write about history. That is the reason why both Jennings and Martin in the seventies seem to take side on Indians by attacking the English settlers. All events that happened in the past belong to the past, and nobody can change or modify history; but due to the different points of view shaped by different cultures of each historian, each of them has written about history based on his/her own perspective and cultural belief. To compare the difference and asymmetry among the secondary sources, Tompkins went on with more researches on primary sources.
Tompkins thought by looking at primary materials of an imprisoned narrative would give her real information about the relationship between Europeans and Indians. She found herself to be disappointed again with her research. In the book, _The Sovereignty and Goodness of God_, the captive, Mary Rowlandson, has used her Puritan views to describe about Native Americans. Her complaint of the act of smoking in Indian culture indicates the Puritan value Rowlandson uses in narrating about Indians. On the other hand, other primary researchers, James Axtell and William Wood described Indians as people with superior and humanity traits, while Norman Heard and Alexander Whitaker interpreted them as humans with savage nature. Employing Eurocentric view, Karen Kuperman clarified that English men didn 't discriminate against Indians because of their race. They just looked down on Indians who decorate themselves as ordinary people, which give them a title of low ranked people in the social class. Robert Berkhofer explained the divergent of these historical accounts by stating that different authors will have different purposes when they write about Native people. As a consequence, the writers of these primary sources also record the history of Indians based on their own cultural aspects.
As Tompkins described in her essay, the conflicts between the reports of secondary and primary resources have induced her to end her research in relativism. Nevertheless, it is not easy to end in relativism since the facts she needs to use to make moral judgment on what happens to the relationship between Europeans and Indians, which led to the mass murder in Indian population, and still remained unknown. I believe moral decision couldn 't be made if there isn 't any moral judgment about the issue. Through the essay, Tompkins also criticizes the academy individuals for their indecisiveness. Instead of making a commitment in relativism and finding out the truth about the history to help Indians, they just talk about their ideas and wait for the truth to come out by itself. Hence, history still repeats in the world of Indians. We learn history to avoid the problems people have made in the past. But it seems like the problems are still remained unsolved with the study of history. Consequently, due to the lack of moral decisions and judgments, Native Americans are still going through what they used to go through in the past.
I believe that people tend to build their opinions based on their cultural backgrounds and their society. Nonetheless, saying this doesn 't mean I agree with the historical accounts given by the authors Tompkins has mentioned above. Throughout history, no one can distinguish the right and wrong perspectives about European-Indian relationship because most of the perspectives apparently are developed by each author 's interpretation of the event. The researchers can 't escape the limitation that their cultures limit them to see. I think every person in this world is curious about their origin. If we can 't depend on historical resources to learn about our past, how else can we learn about it? Therefore, I really hope that each academy writer, whether a historian or a narrative from the history, can use his/her neutral view to write about the history. If there is no history to learn, there is no better future for later generations to build from it.
Work Cited
Tompkins, Jane. " 'Indians ': Textualism, Morality, and the Problem of History." Journal Storage 13.1 (Autumn, 1986): 101-119.
Cited: Tompkins, Jane. " 'Indians ': Textualism, Morality, and the Problem of History." Journal Storage 13.1 (Autumn, 1986): 101-119.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Although events in history occurred over a long span of time and development, history first became an academic subject a little more than 100 years ago (McNeill 12). Since then, a plethora of controversies appeared regarding how historians, scholars, and intellectuals should examine and analyze history. Among the initial methods of studying history was the scientific research method, or scientific source criticism, which fundamentally extracts valid, legitimate facts from a diverse range of historical sources. Throughout time, however, the facts derived from this method of historical study gradually altered, leading to a new method of historical study: using facts and combining them with opinions and goals to constitute personal interpretations. As Oscar Handlin zealously asserts, historians and scholars should provide a strict examination of history based on a chronological study of known and verifiable facts as opposed to using verifiable facts as the basis for their own interpretation, influenced by their own group, experiences, beliefs, and personal motives. Through implementing a strict examination of history, historians can successfully detect and eradicate bias in their writings, allow the government as well as individuals to gain an insight into the past in order to secure and progress the future, and grasp the magnitude of truth.…
- 645 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Arnold's case, poverty is a very serious situation, which has impacted his life into many negative aspects. Poverty among Native Americans affects them more physically than academically or socially because they have limited services and transportation. In the book, "The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian" by Sherman Alexie, Arnold has a very difficult time getting to school because he lives on the reservation and his school is 22 miles away. In one situation, Arnold said "My dad was supposed to pick me up. But he wasn't sure if he'd have enough gas money...If they didn't come, I'd start walking...Twenty-two miles. I got blisters each time" (Alexie 87-88). Arnold's biggest struggle everyday is trying to get to school. There…
- 363 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Another editorial review from the El Paso Herald-Post claims the book “will be the best introduction to Indian acculturation in the southwest for a long time to come.” The El Paso Herald-Post was founded in 1881 and ceased publication in 1997. Though one of the highlighted editorial reviews is from a post that has been out of business for almost twenty years, Cycles of Conquest continues to be used as a source book for anthropologists and historians. Edward H Spicer’s Cycles of Conquest contains dated language that is modernly considered slander. But college-aged students should not be protected from offensive and insensitive language; the malicious vocabulary should be noted and discussed. To sensor historical works that contain insensitive language is a masking agent: it hides social progress that is exponentially improving. Cycles of Conquest should not be retired as a source book for information about southwestern cultural change because of its offensive language, it should be retired because of its outdated…
- 808 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“Red earth white lies” by Vine Deloria is by all accounts and standards is a ground breaking book which brings into light the troubling picture of cultural bias against the native American Indians, their origin and historic traditions. In his own words he emphasizes the need of dialog between western science and tribal people and says “corrective measures must be taken to eliminate scientific misconceptions about Indians, their culture and their past”. He goes on to say “there needs to be a way that Indian traditions can contribute to the understanding of scientific beliefs at enough specific points so that the Indian traditions will be taken seriously as valid bodies…
- 1594 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Among the reading assignments, the chapter “Who Owns the Past?” in Dangerous Game by MacMillan piqued my interest to elaborate on. In this chapter, she emphasizes that history is written by many historians who have their own views, interpretations, and biases. In this regard, she implies that we should not simply believe in what historians claim, but dig into its sources and figure out from many perspectives. There are many ‘bad’ history produced by historians without offering a wide range of views and this can be used as an instrument that can largely influence on people by giving them prejudice on certain events. There are always reasons behind each event and it is important to find out what indeed happened as well as where the history is…
- 307 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Juan Gines de Sepulveda was a Spanish priest, theologian, and philosopher who wrote “A Second Democritus: on the just causes of the war with the Indians”. Sepulveda is most widely known for his involvement with Bartolome de la Casas in the debate at Valladolid in 1550 where he defended the position of the colonists by arguing that the Native Americans were barbaric, inferior, and incapable of self-governance. He believed that the Indians should be “natural slaves” and that violence was needed to make them be amendable to conversion. Sepulveda stated that, "Those whose condition is such that their function is the use of their bodies and nothing better can be expected of them, those, I say, are slaves of nature. It is better for them to be ruled thus." Juan Sepulveda is known as the ‘father of modern racism’ and the adversary of Bartolome de las Casas.…
- 648 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Robertson stayed true to his objective and only shows slight bias. An unfair representation of the Native Americans was conveyed when Robertson called the Indians savages. Yet, he supported his claim by illustrating the Indian’s savage behaviors later in the text. While displaying the Indian’s savage behavior, he did not thoroughly examine their culture; and therefore, showed slight bias in his work. However, it does not diminish Robertson’s overall objectivity.…
- 657 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
engagement with the forced Cherokee removal of the nineteenth century as he maneuvers within a critical milieu of Native literary theorists such as Daniel Heath Justice and Robert Warrior. Confronting the historical gaps that are generated from Euro Western claims to truth, authenticity, and accuracy, Hausman has actively produced a space of cultural resistance that follows in the critical tracks of Justice,…
- 1405 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
While I sit in my US History college course, the only thing I am indebted about is the academically stimulating Professor, who sanctions quality analytical dialogue. If I was required to sit through this class, accepting the fabrications and omissions of the materials, I would have opted for a great amount of “sick days”, along with a lower grade. Upon analysis of the obligatory text, however, I am incessantly reminded of why I so abhorred the subject of history since age ten. I guess I’m just not the type of intellectual, whom likes to be fed a load of bullshit, and then told to swallow it holding a coerced smile, while dutifully citing it as a deliciously satisfying meal of facts. The American history academia is overflowing with emblematic propaganda, heaving with histrionic melodrama, in which teaches pupils to think as simple-minded, white-centric citizens. Here, you will read a comprehensive elucidation on precisely why this is so apparent.…
- 2636 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
The author’s persona in “An Indian Father’s Plea”, written by Robert Lake, is an angry Indian father who is upset with the treatment of his child in school. He claims the teacher has, “already labeled him a “slow learner”’ because his son is Indian (Lake 109). This plays on the major controversial topic of racial or cultural profiling. The narrator speaks in a very intelligent tone, which only proves to his argument that you can be culturally diverse and intellectual. “An Indian Father’s Plea” is a prime example of why you cannot judge a book by its…
- 476 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Growing up I always dreaded history, I never understood why we had to learn about the past. It wasn’t until a couple years ago that I realize that history is what shaped the world into what it is today and where I stand in this world. As a Mexican living in the United States history has really helped me understand why my family and I don’t have the same opportunity as white people. When I read the first 4 chapters to Lies My Teacher Told Me by James Loewen right away I was able to relate to what he was saying. Being a person of color learning history growing up I noticed that the history books only showed one point of view. A lot of the truth was covered up and that’s why now when I read something historical it’s very important for me to read…
- 373 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Goins, William M., ed. “The Forgotten Story of American Indian Slavery.” Pan-Tribal Confederacy of Indigenous Tribal Nations. Pan-Tribal Confederacy, n.d. Web. 22 Aug. 2011.…
- 1217 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Throughout the entire book of “Pocahontas and the Powhatan dilemma” the reader will be left shocked from discovering the real essence of the Native American culture. By unfolding many mysteries related to the English men-Powhatan relationship, Camilla Townsend intends to give the readers an awareness of the great plethora of lies written by the English people about the Native Americans that has been instilled in popular culture. The problem with all of this is that the author herself has failed to give an accurate account of history due to three main reasons.…
- 483 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Waltrip, Lela and Rufus. Indian Women: thirteen who played a part in the history of…
- 2216 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
1. First, we must ask ourselves what constitutes reading material as American Literature. Simply put, it is literature that assesses the copious literary history of the United States (the American experience). Therefore, the reading assignments such as Williams Bradford’s Of Plymouth’s Plantation, excerpts from the Journal of Christopher Columbus, “First Voyage”, Fourth Voyage”, and “Second Voyage”, and the “Story-Telling Stone” are perfect examples of American Literature. All of these stories depict life in America, whether written on paper, or communicated orally from generations to generations. However, the Native American Period, 1620–1840, refer to the period of Native American dominance in the New World. Native American literature consists…
- 1142 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays