Preview

Summary Of A Civil Action By Jan Shlichtmann Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of A Civil Action By Jan Shlichtmann Case
In the movie, ‘ A Civil Action” the case that is presented stated the contamination of the city’s wells. According to the movie, that caused a number of health problems in which it diagnosed eight children with Leukemia and died. After the childrens’ death, the family’s attempted to sue the companies, W.R. Grace, Beatrice Foods, and the tanneries for dumping the chemical TCE, which contaminated the water. Although Jan Schlichtmann’s considered the case worthless because it was an orphan case, he still accepted the case dealing with the tough questioning of loyal workers, constant loss of money and the repeat siding towards the defendant by the trial judge Walter A. Skinner. During the trial as the evidence built up against the companies

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Currently, I am employed at Massood Law Group. The firm represents plaintiff and injured workers, but primarily focuses on representation of surgeons, medical facilities, and hospitals in No Fault (PIP) and Workers’ Compensation claims. My responsibilities and duties include educating and advocating on our clients behalf in workers’ compensation courts and associating in personal injury actions. With respect to the workers’ compensation field, I am able to take a case from the initial filing process to competition both for the injured worker and medical provider. I also researched and drafted pleadings, motions, and other legal documents necessary to resolve the case.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case commenced when a group of various parents and families suspected that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause “who is going to apologize to you when you don’t know who did it and pay me” [1], he perceived that 2 corporations sat on the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and filed a major lawsuit, which stated that that the two corporations, W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste.”Lawsuits are a declaration of war. They begin the same way: with a complaint” [1]. The…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the film A Civil Action, Jan Schlictmann is the plaintiff representing the eight families of the children who died of leukemia, which the families suspect to be caused by chemical contamination of the water in Woburn, Massachusetts. Anne Anderson spearheads this group of families and is the spokesperson for the group. Schlictmann initially does not want to take the case, arguing that the only reason the case may be successful in court is if the court sees a theatrical value in the dead children. [1] However, after being informed that the defendants are Beatrice Foods and W.R. Grace, both wealthy companies with astronomical assets, Schlictmann takes the case. The defendants are William Cheeseman and Jerome Facher, who represent Grace and…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    W. R. Reilly Case

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, W.R. Grace and Beatrice foods have polluted the aquifer located under East Woburn. There is no question of this, as testimony from workers such as Al Love show that they have spilled, poured and dumped TCE, or Trichloroethylene. Mr. Reilly testified that he should have known what was happening on the 15 acres of property he leased out to the Whitney barrel company. By dumping TCE and other chemicals onto the ground, these companies introduced these harmful substances into the environment, particularly the aquifer underneath. These chemicals are not industrial revolution chemicals; they are modern, harmful chemicals that have adverse health affects.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Procedure: The jury first found for Mr. Faverty. Then Faverty filed suit against McDonald’s, and McDonald’s appealed.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    History: Steiney Richards was tried and convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. Richards appealed the trial court’s decision, the Court of Appeals affirmed. Richards then appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and that court affirmed the appellate court’s ruling. (201 Wis. 2d 845, 549 N.W.2d 218 (1996)). Richards appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, certiorari was granted.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: William E. Story had promised his nephew, William E. Story II, $5,000 if his nephew would abstain from drinking alcohol, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until the nephew reached 21 years of age. The uncle responded to his nephew in a letter dated February 6, 1875 in which he told his nephew that he would fulfill his promise. The uncle died a couple years later without sending the money to the nephew.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “judgment is properly granted when there is no triable issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(c). A defendant or cross-defendant has met his or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if that party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437(o)(2). Once the moving party defendant meets its burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show a triable issue of material fact exists. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(o)(2). On appeal, the reviewing court exercises its independent judgment, deciding whether undisputed facts have been established that negate the opposing party's claim or state a complete defense. Cal. Lab. Code § 2922 establishes the presumption that an employer may terminate its employees at will, for any or no reason. A fortiori, the employer may act peremptorily, arbitrarily, or inconsistently, without providing specific protections such as prior warning, fair procedures, objective evaluation, or preferential reassignment”.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1900s, two women came into hospitals and left with trespasses against their bodies. In the Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital case, the patient came in complaining of a stomachache and left with a hysterectomy. In the Mohr v. Williams case, a woman came in with a bad right ear and left with an operated-on left ear. While there are differences between these cases, there are more similarities; both are cases of malpractice and breach of consent, but both have specific particularities. Both cases involve a breach of consent.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Greynolds v. Kurman case, I agree with the court’s decision. “There was sufficient evidence to support a finding of lack of informed consent” (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 339). When I read the case it seemed like the physicians did not put any effort in explaining the complete picture, including the Greynolds options, and letting them decide what they wanted. By law, “when there is doubt as to a patient’s capacity to consent, the consent of the legal guardian or next of kin should be obtained” (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 337). Mrs. Greynolds was readily available to sign consent if that is what she decided to do. “There are a variety of consent forms designed to more specifically describe the risks, benefits, and alternatives of…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary In his study, David L. Rosenhan investigates whether or not sanity is a detectable condition that may be identified reliably by mental institution staff and doctors. Additionally, does the decision reached by the staff and doctors depend more on their evaluation of the individual patient or the environment in which the evaluation occurs? Rosenhan gathered together eight people who agreed to feign a mental disorder (“pseudopatients”) in order to gain admittance as a patient in various psychiatric institutions across the country. The pseudopatients pretended to have symptoms of schizophrenia upon initial examination, but once admitted, resumed behaving as they normally would and insisted that they felt fine and no longer experienced any…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For each legal issue the film provided a case or story in order for the viewer to better understand the situations at hand. The first case provided was the case of Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s, the case of the hot coffee. Mrs. Liebeck’s family thoroughly and genuinely explain the case, differing in facts and tone from the media and tort reform…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    case? If the case went to the High Court or the Supreme Court was their…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays