Despite of the very different arguments of the three works, Betts presents some points in which they could agree, beside of the above mentioned two similarities. However, the overlap is always in different constellation between two different books and never between the three of them. The differences seem to be obvious by looking the their theories. By simplifying the differences, one can stated that Fukuyama predicted a promising future world consisting of Western liberalism while Huntington outlined a pessimistic outlook of a clash of civilisation and Mearsheimer saw a rising China and consequently a challenge for the USA. In addition, Betts put the three theories in context of 9/11. He outlines that many saw the 9/11 attacks as “clash of civilisations” what Huntington had predicted in his book and dismissed Fukuyama’s optimism. As a realist, Mearsheimer, had nothing to say about the attacks since terrorist groups do not posses the capabilities, compare to great powers, to seriously challenge a powerful state such a the
Despite of the very different arguments of the three works, Betts presents some points in which they could agree, beside of the above mentioned two similarities. However, the overlap is always in different constellation between two different books and never between the three of them. The differences seem to be obvious by looking the their theories. By simplifying the differences, one can stated that Fukuyama predicted a promising future world consisting of Western liberalism while Huntington outlined a pessimistic outlook of a clash of civilisation and Mearsheimer saw a rising China and consequently a challenge for the USA. In addition, Betts put the three theories in context of 9/11. He outlines that many saw the 9/11 attacks as “clash of civilisations” what Huntington had predicted in his book and dismissed Fukuyama’s optimism. As a realist, Mearsheimer, had nothing to say about the attacks since terrorist groups do not posses the capabilities, compare to great powers, to seriously challenge a powerful state such a the