Preview

Summary Of Bret Stephens Repeal The Second Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
586 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Bret Stephens Repeal The Second Amendment
In Bret Stephens, OP-ED article “Repeal the Second Amendment” he states the point that the Second Amendment needs to be repealed, just as the title insinuates. In the article, many points are brought from different standpoints are brought up and discussed, including a standpoint based on the law, one based on personal-safety, one on national-security, and another on the point of personal liberty. The first point that is mentioned is the standpoint based on law which states, that with a more prevalent appearance of guns there will be more murders. The stance on personal-safety mentions, that with more guns present there is a decrease in safety. The third stance is that on the national-safety which states, that the need for a militia is unnecessary at this day in age and that the power that is needed to defeat large threats are found in missiles not in the militia. The final point is that of the personal liberty stance which mentions, that armed citizens violate the power of the government. …show more content…
Bret Stephens brings up the point of mental-health checks and how those who side with the Conservative side often state that more needs to be done in the area of mental health. The author then goes on to say that often times those who commit mass murders like Stephen Paddock, would not have aroused the curiosity of a mental-health professional before he opened fire on a concert in Las Vegas. It has been found that certain names like, Mohammed, would cause suspicion if they were to purchase firearms and rounds in large quantities. After stating this, the author then goes on to mention why liberals lose the debate on gun

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Weisman reports on the senate’s decision to block several methods to expand gun control. In the wake of the violent shooting that left 20 children dead in Newtown Connecticut, The Senate was challenged with the decision to increase gun control in order to help prevent this tragedy from ever happening again. 90 percent of Americans want gun control however, “A bipartisan compromise to expand background checks for gun buyers, a ban on assault weapons and a ban on high-capacity gun magazines all failed to get the 60 votes needed under an agreement between both parties”,(Weisman 2013 para 2). Survivors and those affected by those who were harmed by gun violence were appalled at the decision made by the senate. President Obama also commented on the decision by the senate calling the day “a pretty shameful day for Washington”. Those who opposed gun control said they chose not to base their decisions off passion, despite the fact the victims and family of victims…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Second Amendment is unnecessary and should be repealed” a fair statement and one that I strongly agree with. The second amendment states that all man has the right to bear arms or own a gun. In July 4,1776 North America got its independence from the British Empire. Next our founding fathers came together and created the Bill of Rights. During the eighteenth century America was a young and newly independent country. In the 1770s they needed to demonstrate their strength as a country. Also, Americans were driven to protect their lands from countries that have a stronger government and army. But in this century,America is a stronger country with a very strong army and government. Considering that American now has a strong military with…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to repeal the 2nd amendment, a new amendment must take its place, which those supporting the repeal of the 2nd have no replacement for, two-thirds of the legislative bodies of the U.S. Congress must accept it, and lastly, thirty-eight out of fifty states must vote in agreement. Therefore it's almost impossible, and very very difficult for thirty-eight consecutive states to vote yes for the removal of their protection; it would be as one giving a burglar a key to their house, but in this case giving up a right many have died for in the 1700s. Though the government may be removing the guns from the hands of its citizens, the violence still remains. In fact, the removal of the constitutional principle was proved to be futile when a similar repeal in handguns occurred in the United Kingdom in England and Wales in the year of 1996, when a “50 percent increase in homicide rates” occurred, the firearm homicide rate doubling between 1996 and 2002, causing more problems in a country with fewer tensions than that of the U.S. and forcing one to ponder on whether the repeal would truly save people, or put them in more…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second amendment is our personal right to own and bear arms. People want to get rid of the second amendment because they blame guns for the crime rate and the murders and etc. There is a debate about keeping it or getting rid of it.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.…

    • 4325 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those two things seem to coincide with each other. Lately on the news there have been a number of mass shootings, terrorist attacks, violence in neighborhood, etcetera. As the number of these crimes seem to happen more often throughout the years, peoples fight or flight instincts tend to kick in, and they feel like they have to do what they need to do in order to protect themselves. And that usually results in people's fight response being activated, and wanting to be feel like they are able to keep themselves and their family safe end up with them going out and getting a gun. As of last October, the Gallup poll was taken and stemmed out into saying that 63% of Americans believe that having a gun in their household makes them feel a whole lot safer than having a home without a gun. According to the Pew Research Center Survey only 37% of adults own a gun in their household. While the numbers may appear to not seem like a lot, as a researcher it's hard to pinpoint the exact number of individuals who do have a gun in their possession due to not everyone answering the survey on whether or not they have acquired a gun. So the big question for the people and the government are "Is the right to keep and bear arms a civil right?" and " Should we have restrictions when obtaining a gun?" So the present today debate on the Second Amendment main focus is on the protection of an individual right to bear arms or is it a right than can only be protected by the…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution is the amendment and the section of the Bill of Rights that says that people have the right to keep and bear arms. I read this to mean that the idea behind this amendment was to have and keep guns for protection against a corrupt and oppressive government; yet, many choose to use their guns against each other. However, in the wake of so many recent tragic events involving gun violence, many groups argue about whether the Second Amendment actually protects the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through military organizations. With that said, I began to question if the Second Amendment of the Constitution should be revised or remain as is. Does this law cause more harm than good?…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No other amendments in the United States Constitution has caused as much controversy as the Second Amendment. The amendment states that the people of America are allowed to bare arms and maintain a well regulated militia. This has caused a lot of controversy and issues with gun control in recent years. The Second Amendment should be amended in order to have more rules, regulations, and provide a safer America for people. People in favor of guns suggest that there is a need for guns for all citizens to protect people from the government. However, violence is a large issue today with guns and weapons. The Founding Father’s were building America with a more liberal perspective that envisioned a free society where individuals protected their own property and person with minimal interference from the government. In today’s society America has built a stronger military and police force where people do not need as many weapons in their homes with such high power.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years now our country has been in a heated debate on the second amendment. Some people feel that it is not safe to let citizens have and carry guns, while others agree it is their right as an american to own a gun. In America, there are approximately 270 million firearms possessed by civilians, and only 897,000 carried by police.Close to 33,000 Americans were victims of gun-related deaths in 2011 and an average of 268 citizens are shot every day. In the past decade our country has witnessed 142 mass school shootings and, in 2010 alone 19,392 people committed suicide with a gun. These frightening statistic are what I believe cuz some people to be against the second amendment.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that the citizens of the United States have the right to bear arms, or keep weapons. This means that our forefathers made sure that legally we would be able to have the right to protect ourselves. According to the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, “Self-defense is a fundamental right.” (Pros). Almost half of Americans agree with this statement, and 67 percent of people who own guns claim that…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In light of the recent tragedies in Aurora, Colorado and Newtown, Connecticut, which involved gun violence and resulted in deaths of many people, gun control has been on the forefront of political debates in the United States. Many of these debates call to the Second Amendment as either being a hindrance to the implementation of stricter laws or as reason to simply enforce the already existing laws, leading many to question whether the American government should rely on a two hundred year old document to influence modern day policies. The Second Amendment…

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the population are against the 2nd amendment because of the higher crime rate. The amendment was created to protect the citizens instead we use the rules which was created for goods turned into evil. I, myself, personally believe we should preserve our 2nd amendment because it allows the population to make decision on right and wrong. The process to carry firearms needs more cordial and thoroughly to eliminates the problematic of having the firearms into the wrong hands, the government needs to create a system which allow each state to severely punished those who carry illegal…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The interpretation of the “Standard Model” of the Second Amendment guarantees the right of individual Americans to own and carry firearms. This interpretation represents a part of American history that is foundational to the Second Amendment and that many collective rights theorists would prefer to erase. The collective rights theory is that arms are only to be used in connection with a militia. The history of America and its creation of the Constitution, as well as its Bill of Rights, is so fundamentally important to us today in preserving our civil liberties, that it is paramount we resist the temptation to avoid or eradicate any part of this important history with all of its milestones. If there were one message on the Second Amendment that should be conveyed, it would be to learn of our American Constitutional history in the…

    • 5294 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays