It seemed to me that most of the works focused on post-war life or the lives of minorities. Called the “dominant and integral” focus of new military history and it is no doubt when it can pull an average reader into an academic piece of work. The most intriguing examples were that of the Civil War where Citino explains how historians are changing the dialogue by incorporating race, gender, and other popular topics to their work. Particularly impressive was that two pieces could display the lives of African American soldiers in two different branches of the military and how their experiences were so wholly different and yet both pieces ended with the same point: people of color not only had to fight to participate in the Civil War but to have their stories told. With such a demand for the untold stories of lower class citizens and marginalized people it is fantastic to know that they are being told around events that shaped countries, especially the roles of people of color and …show more content…
Military affairs incorporates history of memory, culture, and some other aspects, to create a dialogue on how warfare is viewed by the public and why it is viewed in that manner. The big focus here seemed to be erasure and it is fantastic to know that there are historians working to bring to light such wrongdoings, particularly in terms of American history where it causes such turmoil. Upon learning that our course would focus on immigration and a classmate mentioning Angel Island, which I had never heard about, it truly showed that the scope of erasure is not only a Civil War issue either, though popular media would try to present it as