and Indians existed, most Indians were stereotyped as being “drunken, lazy, dirty, or promiscuous” (489, Crosby). Throughout her university career and interactions with her professors, Crosby finds that this view of the Indian was changing in postmodern society. Alongside being considered an uncivilized savage, an Indian was "the negative space of the 'positive' force of colonialist hegemony," documenting a fictive, yet historical whole (490, Crosby). When looking into the works of Gyatri Spivak, Crosby finds that throughout time, there has been an increasing positive association of the indigenous person as one that had been exploited, but one that is ready to be recovered and explored. Despite this embracement for "difference," this view is still largely based on assimilation as Western people still hold a philanthropic concern for these people.
and Indians existed, most Indians were stereotyped as being “drunken, lazy, dirty, or promiscuous” (489, Crosby). Throughout her university career and interactions with her professors, Crosby finds that this view of the Indian was changing in postmodern society. Alongside being considered an uncivilized savage, an Indian was "the negative space of the 'positive' force of colonialist hegemony," documenting a fictive, yet historical whole (490, Crosby). When looking into the works of Gyatri Spivak, Crosby finds that throughout time, there has been an increasing positive association of the indigenous person as one that had been exploited, but one that is ready to be recovered and explored. Despite this embracement for "difference," this view is still largely based on assimilation as Western people still hold a philanthropic concern for these people.