Preview

Summary Of David Bouz The War On Drugs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of David Bouz The War On Drugs
In his essay on the war on drugs, writer David Boaz calls attention to the restrictive effect that the prohibition of drugs, like marijuana and cocaine, is having on the liberties of the American citizen. In support of his claim he cites the “zero tolerance” program that allows law enforcement agents to seize personal vehicles on allegations of illegal drugs, this completely disregards the idea of being innocent until proven guilty guaranteed by the bill of rights. The writer also mentions the idea that a war on drugs is really a war on people, those who buy and sell drugs, therefore, prohibition does not restrict drug use, rather, it restricts the liberty of those persons involved with drug use.
Boaz speaks out against drug prohibition and its effects on American liberties, namely, the right to live one’s life as one sees fit without violating the equal right of others. He claims that it is the right of the American citizen, as granted by the constitution, to put whatever substance they want into their own bodies. Consequently, the government prohibiting such substances restricts the liberties not only inherent
…show more content…
He quotes politicos such as Warren Bennet, the so-called Drug Czar of the 1980’s, who himself had an addiction to tobacco, stating his addiction never led him to commit any “drive by shootings”, and Nancy Reagan, who said casual drug users are basically accomplices to murders committed by drug lords. Boaz reasons that it is not drug users who are responsible for the violence, rather, the laws that prohibit these people from obtaining their desired substance legally or affordably. The author says it’s basic supply and demand, laws reduce supply forcing prices up, consequently, addicts must commit crimes to pay for their habit and dealers must settle disputes with illegal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout the chapter the author explains the way that the system works, and she points out ways that the drug war frequently functions to undermine many civil liberties. She further demonstrates how people who commit minor offenses, and in far too many cases, people who are innocent become involved in the criminal justice system.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article entitled “Would Legalized Drugs Produce a Zombie Nation?”(Cederblorn and Paulsen, 332 - 334) written by Stephen Chapman. The author (Stephen Chapman) provides a clear details and analogy of the drug use and abuse in the American society. The article gave a picture of a theoretical view where the use of banned drugs is legitimized by the United States government. The unbelievable situation of having a legitimate way of circulating the proscribed drugs would create a lot of chaos in the communities and society in general.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The phrase “sex, drugs, and rock and roll” held true to its well-earned spot in 1970’s and 1980’s society. With a new, looser culture, explicit music, raunchy and rambunctious movies as well as a societal focus on many things immoral, it was an era of challenging social norms. As the use of recreational and psychoactive drugs, as well as alcohol, increased, a new problem arose; how does law enforcement and the government undo the damage being made by this new society? Laws were passed, bureaus and commissions were formed, and the President of the United States began what he called “The War on Drugs”. Over the years, some of these solutions have proven to make some impact. The initiation, tactics, and attempts at dealing a major blow to drug abuse have all affected the way America sees drugs today. A new type of warfare had made its way into the country, and after all these years, it has made its fair share of positive and negative effects.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Jim Crow Thesis

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The rest of the book entails the effects of the War on Drugs. I found it particularly interesting how the justice system/police have sought different ways to take people to jail based on hunches on drugs or using minor traffic violations as an excuse to stop motorists for drug investigations- even when there is no profound evidence that the motorist has engaged in a drug crime. Also, it was interesting to read how the Supreme Court (whose responsibility is to protect minorities from majoritarian democracy) has placed somewhat of an infringement on minorities fourth amendment…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The liberal view on legalization reflects an assessment of the relative harms of drug use versus drug prohibition, and in that sense is similar to the libertarian calculus. But liberals put less weight on consumer sovereignty, and they are not as fundamentally suspicious of government prohibitions as are libertarians. Thus, for commodities viewed as substantially harmful (e.g., tobacco), liberals are willing to consider prohibition, but for commodities viewed as relatively benign (e.g., marijuana), they find prohibition excessive (Boyd 1998). Liberals agree on the fact that prohibition has many undesired consequences. These include the infringements on civil liberties that are an inevitable consequence of attempts to sanction victimless crimes; the corruption and violence fostered in foreign countries by U.S. attempts to enforce prohibition; the increased frequency of overdoses and accidental poisonings that results from the poor quality control in black markets; the increased property crime that results from elevated drug prices; and the violence that results because participants in black markets settle disagreements with guns rather than lawyers. Liberal legalizers argue, therefore, that the arrest and prosecution of drug users is ill-advised and that current…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War on Drugs was proclaimed by the Nixon Administration in the signing of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. It evoked the current era of mandatory minimum sentencing, systematic racism, and mass incarceration of colored people. While the War on Drugs has certainly sought to eradicate controlled substances and destroy the networks established for their distribution, State efforts to control drugs are also a way for dominant groups to express racial power. Despite the socioeconomic factors that contribute to drug use, it is evident that drug legislation is inherently biased and fuels racially motivated mass incarceration.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butts

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In "Against the legalization of Drugs", We've seen how James Q. Wilson says that Heroin and Cocaine should be kept illegal. Perhaps the strongest argument Wilson gives to support this claim, is that a government may rightly restrict an individual's liberty to prevent harm to others. Although this is in violation with an individual's freedom of thought and speech. In this paper, I will present two arguments from Kantian ethics and Douglas Husak that refute this idea, and further show that heroin and cocaine should not be kept illegal.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic we chose was an important time in history dealing with prisons. We chose MASS INCARCERATION and focused on the legacy of Ronald Reagan and the escalating war on drugs. Today we are going to talk to you about the policies surrounding the war on drugs and how they have affected mass incarceration and policies that devalue the meaning of the 4th amendment.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Against the Legalization of Drugs,” by Peter de Marneffe, the argument that the use and possession of drugs needs to be decriminalized is made, because of the belief that the criminalization of drug use and possession violates the rights of citizens. In this paper, I will defend de Marneffe’s position by refuting a possible objection. Contrarians may claim that decriminalizing drugs will inevitably lead individuals to try harder and more dangerous drugs.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many have said that the war on drugs is a failure and needs reform. Others have lamented that the war on drugs is a war that cannot be won and valuable resources and money has been used up. Drugs are cheaper, purer, and more easily obtained than ever before. The war on drugs is futile. This paper will discuss why the United States should end the war on drugs.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctors see it as a disease that needs a medical approach as well as punishment from the law. However, on the other side prosecutors and law enforcement refused to see them as sick people. They felt as if this took away the accountability of the drug users. The author stated that “criminalization and medication are complementary.”…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1980’s the Regan-Bush administration declared their war on drugs. During this particular time there was an existing notion that drug use was at an all time high and the administration went out to put an end to the problem. Recreational drug use during the prohibition was historically aimed at an increasing number of people stop using drugs because it was seen as immoral and destructive to the body. In reality the use of drugs was on the decline. The war was a failure, “The street price of cocaine, the war’s signature drug, should have risen if dealing were becoming riskier and drugs less available; prices fell”(Tonry p.81). The outcomes during the War on Drugs came at high costs with low rewards and failures that were associated with the war significantly outweighed the resulting outcome of people taking part in drug use. During this time it was already seen that the black population was at the origin of drug users and that they were the ones creating this problem, furthermore, effecting any and all…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legalization of Marijuana

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Gray, James P, (2001) Why our drug laws have failed and what we can do about it: A…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalization of Marijuana

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is no feasible way to completely abolish drug use in the United States. As with Prohibition of Alcohol in the earlier part of this century, the fight against drugs has backfired. The United States is spending billions of dollars a year to fight a war, which over the last 60 years, has shown that it cannot be won. "So let's use a little reverse psychology on the subject. What would happen if marijuana or other illegal drugs were legalized" (Rosenthal, 133)?…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays