Preview

Summary Of Foreword To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
573 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Foreword To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
This article is adapted from former US President Jimmy Carter, Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Carter uses anecdotes, evidence from reliable sources, and a call to action with pathos to persuade his audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry.

The use of an anecdote in Carter's argument gives the reader an up close and personal look into the Arctic Nation Wildlife Refuge. It strengthens Carter's argument by stressing how beautiful and untouched this part of the world is and how it not only carries a great deal of importance to the animals that inhabit it but also to the indigenous people that have lived there. The anecdote Carter gives also shows what inspired him to make efforts to protect this land and the life that encompasses it. In this essay Carter explains his amazement with the land and more specifically the Porcupine caribou as they migrated, Carter then goes on to say, “...I was saddened to think of the tragedy that might occur if this great wilderness was consumed by a web of
…show more content…
Carter states evidence by claiming, “In 1960, President Dwight D. Eisenhower established the original 8.9 million-acre Arctic National Wildlife Range” and then furthering his claim more evidence by saying, “I signed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, monumental legislation that safeguarded more than 100 million acres. doubled the size of the former range, and restricted development in areas that are clearly incompatible with oil exploration.” By including this reliable evidence in his statement he is showing readers that he has taken action and that he has proof of doing so, therefore, supporting his claim by to prevent the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from being used to develop industry and is thoroughly committed to protecting the life that inhabits the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dwight R Lee Analysis

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his piece, Dwight R. Lee explains that with oil drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, there would be many benefits as compared to the cost. He doesn’t deny that there would be risks associated with the drilling. However, he feels that they do not begin to compare to the benefits. He explains that the main reason that this has become such a hot topic is because of the high prices of gasoline and oil. One company that he looks at is the National Audubon Society. They are against opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling because they feel that it will “destroy the integrity.” This is the same company that owns the 26,000 acre Rainey Wildlife Sanctuary and opens it to drilling. By allowing this drilling, the Audubon Society has received more than $25 million. This has allowed them to own other wildlife and wilderness land.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jimmy Carter’s clever use of personal anecdote begins his argument of why the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be kept preserved. In the the article it says, “More than a decade ago, [my wife] Rosalynn and I had the fortunate opportunity to camp and hike in these regions of the Arctic Refuge. During bright July days, we walked along ancient caribou trails and studied the brilliant mosaic of wildflowers…” This short anecdote gives the audience a moving feeling. Carter makes us feel as if we are there with them, walking the trails and feeling the environment. He gives us an impression that we want/need to keep the environment preserved. He emphasized how beautiful the landscape is to give an impression of guilt if the landscape were to…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to establish his credibility, Robbins uses the knowledge of experts on caribou biology. Robbin establishes his authority on caribou by referencing “Norm Merz, a wildlife biologist with the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho”, who agreed with Robbins's position on the status of caribou. By including the opinion of a highly qualified person, Robbins makes himself…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In former US President Jimmy Carter’s Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey, he writes about his stance on the controversial debate of whether or not to preserve the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Carter claims that the human-spoiling of the pristine tundra and the life the ecosystem holds is not worth the little “benefits” it would cost “America’s only Arctic Refuge.” The author utilizes authoritative sources and his personal hands-on experiences, diction and rhetorical devices, and logical and emotional appeal to further convince the readers to believe and trust his judgment on the situation. Carter uses multiple different sources of authority and personal connections.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The absurdity of certain arguments, for me, makes it difficult to fairly analyze a piece of work. It is my lack of patience for supreme stupidity that disables me from comparing two certain articles on the topic of “Wilderness”. When asked to read, summarize, and then write about the differing opinions between Wallace Stegner’s “Wilderness Letter” (1960) and William Cronan’s “The Trouble with Wilderness” (1996), I approached reading them not expecting too much of a difference or surprise. I actually expected the latter article to be more astute being that it was written 36 years more recently. Upon completing the philosophical, brief, and rather vague article by Wallace Stegner, I looked forward to reading the next article to see if my assignment was worth my time. The incoherent, unfounded ramblings of William Cronan baffled me so much that I never re-read the first article, opting instead to read and research his arrogant nonsense many times over. I have been instructed to represent the ideas of each author fairly; but fairness is a term subject to interpretation, and I believe it is only fair (or rather my duty) as a critic to…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When reading Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer as it documents the journey Chris McCandless took and watching the movie The Grizzly Man as it documents Timothy Treadwell’s journey to document bears I was struck by how similar the two men, McCandless and Treadwell, really were. Yes, there were a great many differences between the two but also by how similar they were. While both men showed how they hated modern society and felt a strong desire to live outside of our society, they both also had very different takes on Alaskan wilderness and how to survive in their journeys. Just as both loved the outdoors, however, the two had very different practices concerning it. Treadwell would return to society every summer to work and prepare for his next outing and Treadwell refused to take a gun with him. In contrast, McCandless spent all of his time outdoors and away from human society unless he absolutely needed to and carried a gun with him into the wilderness.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tundra Research Paper

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Tundra is an enormous biome. It covers about one fifth of the earth! That is a good part of the Earth. Greenland is a very good example of the tundra. It is located near the top of the world, near the north pole! The most distinctive characteristic of the tundra, is its permanent layer of permafrost, which means it has a thick layer of frozen soil throughout the year. The latitude of the tundra is 66.5625 degrees north, 0 degrees east. The tundra does not have many types of vegetation. It has shrubs, grass in some parts and a lot of mosses. The tundra is too cold to be able to grow a lot of vegetation. The animals that live in the tundra are the arctic foxes, musk ox, the snowy owl, lemmings, and the polar bear!…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel, Into The Wild, written by Jon Krakauer, provides a professional insight into Chris McCandless’s one-hundred-thirteen day rogue dissonance from society, meaning, abandoning his possessions, car, money, and even his well-to-do family. Many consider McCandless’s voyage as intriguing or inspiring. However, I believe McCandless’s actions are egotistically and ideologically driven for the same reasons Krakauer wrote the novel, for the benefit of their own self-interest. Krakauer provides the reader a disservice while writing McCandless’s adventure because the author's writing illuminates an ethically complex bias, which ultimately turned McCandless into a product and a tourist phenomenon. Consequently, Krakauer made a substantial profit, and allowed the wilderness, a place McCandless was attempting to preserve, to become extinct.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A wolf pack is usually a family group five to eight animals, is likely to be the oldest, largest, and strongest wolves in the pack.How are wolves so good at smell blood for miles away? The arctic wolf is interesting because of where it lives, how it survives, and how it is impacted by humans.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When traveling to the high arctic in the Canadian Tundra you can compare the sight of vegetation to traveling to the peaks of the highest mountain range in Canada, The Rockies. There are multiple factors you can use to answer why this is natural phenomenon occurs. The soil’s active layer, glaciers and snow-caps, and the soil in each area not having the four components to become “True Soil”.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people most impacted by these harmful effects are those living in the Arctic. These Arctic communities rely on an “informal, subsistence economy” where goods like clothes and food come from hunting and fishing. The retreat of sea ice and climate related changes in the Arctic marine ecosystem “bears implications for subsistence livelihoods” that the Arctic people rely on for both survival and prosperity. It is the responsibility of Canada to support these northern citizens by understanding the problems they face and to enact policy reflective of the Arctic Council’s…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Cronon Dualism

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    William Cronon’s (year?) article on the wilderness as a “cultural creation” is part of the human construct of natural landscapes. This human construct is part of the two dualistic ideals of historical interstation of the wilderness that North Americans perceive as part of this tradition. For instance, Cronon (year?) defines (1) the “sublime” vision of nature as a beautiful artistic image of the pristine wilderness as a type of sanctuary or Garden of Eden in the 19th century, yet it also defines the dualistic countermand of (2) nature as a dangerous wilderness in the American frontier: “The “delicious paradise” of John Milton’s Eden was surrounded by a “steep wilderness, whose hairy sides/ Access denied” to all who sought entry” (Cronon, year?, p.71). ). This dualistic perspective of Nature defines human beings as controlling or occupying natural spaces, such as Eden, or being victims of the hostility and danger of…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In paragraph five Jimmy Carter appeals to the reader using logic when he says, “In 1960, President Dwight D. Eisenhower established the original 8.9 million-acre Arctic National Wildlife Range to preserve its unique wildlife, wilderness and recreational values”. Jimmy Carter uses this piece of information to show that other people have taken steps to help protect the wildlife. This makes the reader realize that this is not just a simple issue nobody cares about, and that it is a big issue others are taking initiative to fix. Also in paragraph seven, Jimmy Carter uses logic to appeal to the reader. When Jimmy Carter says “At best, the Arctic Refuge might provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles”. Jimmy Carter says this to show the reader that destroying the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not going to benefit anybody and that the solution to the problem is to uses resources more sparingly. This makes the reader feel a sense of guilt in that they might be the reason behind to possible destruction of the Arctic National Wildlife…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arctic Wildlife Refuge

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Arctic Wildlife Refuge, in Jimmy Carter's opion " is one of America's last truly great wilderness". The former President uses his personal experiances to show why the Arctic Wildlife Refuge should be left be. Also he enacted legislation to help protect the wilderness from further development, with bipartisen support. Jimmy Carter want this area to be protected from industry destroying the natural beuaty, along with keeping around for future gernations to enjoy.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays