Preview

Summary Of Just And Unjust Wars

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1768 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Just And Unjust Wars
EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism. Revolutionary terrorism possesses a series of extenuating circumstances that allow for its moral justification in terms of just war and social contract theories, …show more content…
Operating under the social contract framework, the violation of said contract becomes crucial in evaluating the morality of revolutionary terrorism. The sanctity of the social contract depends on the mutual agreement of both parties in the exchange of consent to be governed by protection. However, when the state does not fulfill its obligations by turning against its citizens, it voids the terms of the social contract. Revolutionary forces would then be morally justified in utilizing terrorism. The violation of the contract shifts the moral responsibility onto the oppressive regime, where it arguably was in the first place. It does not make sense for an error on the part of the government to constitute overcompensation on the revolutionary part. By placing undue emphasis on the morality of the revolutionaries while ignoring what the oppressive regime has done to warrant them, Walzer’s approach creates a biased understanding of the moral complexities that must be acknowledged in cases of revolutionary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He argues that terrorism and war are similar and because of that they should be criticized equally. Even though I agree with some of his claims, I disagree with McPhersons conclusion. I will begin this essay by summarizing McPherson’s argument and then I will generate my own argument explaining why McPherson’s conclusion is incorrect. To begin McPherson’s argument, he starts by discussing a set of meetings called the Geneva Conventions. These conventions set out rules to be followed during war.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Terrorist Outlaw,” William McGurn argues that “terrorism is irredeemably evil.” Implicit in this claim is the belief that acts of terrorism are never justified.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas, Dana. “Terror’s Purse Strings.” Practical Arguments: A Text and Anthology. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford St. Martin, 2014. 103-104.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The author holds that there is a “nihilistic edge to terrorism” as their goals are for brutal destruction in some hope of ludicrous utopian goals. She also compares the training videos of our U.S. military with that of one Islamic radical terrorist group. The U.S. military training videos teach our soldiers to distinguish combatants from noncombatants, called the principle of discrimination, and to disobey illegal orders under the laws of war which have evolved from the just war tradition and have become international conventions and arrangements. The terrorist training video however, depicts the decapitation of enemies who had already been disarmed which is forbidden…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tactical definition of terrorism in Coady’s essay is the organized use of violence to target non-combatants for political purposes. Non-combatants are any person’s that do not directly coherence with the agents of aggression. The just war tradition tells us the conditions under which it can be right to resort to war (jus ad bellum) and to guide us in the permissible methods by which we should wage a legitimate war (jus in bello). Given the just war tradition and the tactical definition of terrorism, terrorism is morrally wrong. In addition, the supreme emergency must be accounted for. The definition of supreme emergency allows for the violation of the normal immunity of terrorism to be permissible in warfare, though only with a heavy burden of remorse. However, the theory of supreme emergency suffers from grave defects whether it is offered as an exemption on behalf of a state, or some less established political community, or a group claiming to represent either.Therefore, all forms of terrorism and their exemptions are morally wrong.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just War theory demands that for war to be justified a state must fulfil each of the following 6 requirements: (1) Just cause, (2) Legitimate Authority, (3) Right intention, (4) Likelihood of Success, (5) Proportionality and (6) Last resort. Just war theory was developed by theologians Augustine and Aquinas. This will be further discussed in the essay. In addition to this these 6 requirements can be categorised in 3 parts – Jus ad bellum, Jus in bello and Jus post bellum…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sanders, Rebecca. "(Im)Plausible Legality: The Rationalisation of Human Rights Abuses in the American ‘Global War on Terror." The International Journal of Human Rights 15.4 (2011): 605-626. Print.…

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “Terrorism,” Michael Walzer describes terrorism as the indiscriminate murder of innocent people. He goes on to explain that terrorists have the objective of destroying the morale of a nation and instilling fear within a society by not targeting a specific group of people, but rather, targeting the population as a whole and killing “random” people. Walzer and many like-minded philosophers share the view that terrorism is wrong and is not justified under any circumstances; thus rendering it akin to murder. The preceding view is referred to as the “the dominant view,” as labeled by Lionel K. McPherson, because it is common to a great deal of people – many of who are not philosophers. McPherson attempts to discredit the notion that terrorism is wrong by relating it to modern warfare and showing the ways in which it is better in comparison. After reading the opposing arguments presented by Walzer and McPherson, I will be proving that although terrorism is not as immoral as war, it is still wrong.…

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    To start with we must understand what is meant by a weapon. Encyclopaedia Britannica defines a weapon as “An instrument used in combat for the purpose of killing, injuring, or defeating an enemy.” (Britannica 2013). The Oxford English dictionary defines weapon as “An instrument of any kind used in warfare or in combat to attack and overcome an enemy.” (OED 2013). It is clear from both definitions that a weapon is used in combat against an enemy to overcome them. The act is deliberate in such that it is intentional, not by accident. Therefore this essay will examine cases that terrorism is used by the state deliberately, there must be “mens rea” present.…

    • 5041 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm, as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1, evaluates the conditions that constitute just war, and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths, this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”, and provides only a foundation for which several other nuanced views can expand on. One fundamental idea expressed in his claims though, is the idea that “nothing but aggression can justify war”1. Through this, Walzer establishes the only moral precedent for which a counter-attack…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Put as simply as possible, however, terrorism is the “indiscriminate killing of innocent citizens for political goals” (Hislope and Mughan 262). Terrorism is a multifaceted, complicated concept with deep roots, which is what makes it so difficult to define. Terrorism is not an ideology, but it is a “method, a technique, a tactic” that a variety of groups use to achieve their political goals (Hislope and Mughan 239). Russian anarchist Peter Kropotkin described terrorism as “‘propaganda by the deed,’” suggesting that this kind of violence is simply a method of demonstrating a point that would not otherwise be heard (239). While terrorism definitely has gained prevalence in recent years, it “is anything but new,” with general origins dating back to the biblical Zealots (Rodenbeck 1). The term “‘terrorism’” first emerged during the French Revolution amid the Reign of Terror (Hislope and Mughan 248). However, the modern understanding of terrorism first emerged in the twentieth century, as non-governmental groups attempted to combat the increasing globalization occurring throughout the…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fiala, Andrew. Terrorism and the Philosophy of History: Liberalism, Realism, and the Supreme Emergency Exemption. (Essays in Philosophy. Volume 3 (3) 2002)…

    • 2030 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism Policy

    • 2096 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A common definition of terrorism is the systematic use or threatened use of violence to intimidate a population or government and thereby effect political, religious, or ideological change. First, we may have the wrong idea about what terrorists are trying to achieve, and that their priorities may change over time. In addition, we (and they) may be overestimating their ability to weigh their options. We also don’t realize that emotions play such a big role in their actions. We make the mistake of attaching our own social morals and biases to the actions of terrorists, thinking we understand their motivation, when we have sometimes got it totally wrong. Often they are not looking for political gain, but social benefit. It is also difficult to know exactly what they want, when they appear to be so inconsistent at times.…

    • 2096 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays