Preview

Summary Of Just Take Away Their Guns By James Wilson

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Just Take Away Their Guns By James Wilson
In “Just Take Away Their Guns,” by James Q. Wilson, Collins Professor of Management and Public Policy at the University of California at Los Angeles, the author shows what is wrong with each side of the argument. In the first paragraph, he says, “The president wants still tougher gun control legislation and thinks it will work” (Barnet and Bedau 124). But, he continues on to say how this will not affect the illegal use of guns. About 200 million privately own a gun and one-third of that 200 million own a handgun (Barnet and Bedau 124). Only two percent of the citizens are using them in unlawful acts (Barnet and Bedau 124). The number of people who defend themselves outnumbers the amount of arrests for crimes committed. There are many issues with gun control, such as, whether a citizen should be able to own a gun or not, law enforcement confiscations, and punishment for criminals who use guns. …show more content…
Wilson presents convincing statistics to support his statements. He shows that only a fraction of the guns used by criminals are purchased at a gun shop. He points out that many would-be burglars are scared away because a home owner displayed or used a gun. He also presented statistics that disprove the assertion of gun control advocates that “the cost of self-defense is self injury: Handgun owners are more likely to shoot themselves or their loved ones than a criminal” (Barnet and Bedau 125). These statements are very true and should definitely be taken into consideration when dealing with gun

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Once finished reading James Q. Wilson essay, "Just take away their Guns', reader will notice that there are several sentence that come close to stating his thesis. However, amongst these sentences you will notice that his main topic is to proclaim to reader that there is a lot of work ahead to repeal all guns form those who are undeserving and cannot show the proper maturity or mentality to handle a gun. It not just about taking the guns which is stated in his thesis sentence of, "The most effective way to reduce illegal gun-carrying is to encourage the police to take guns away from people who carry them without a permit. '(Barnet). Through, the usage of more frisk there will be an less likely chance of people illegal possessing guns.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    That is, only a small number of criminals tend to use these guns to their benefit which seems to be a reoccurring theme throughout the article. Deeper into the article Wilson writes about how law-abiding people use guns as self-defensive every year. Knowing this, Wilson provides evidence from Gary Kleck to state “guns are used— that is, displayed or fired — for defense purposes more than a…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson states that there are too many guns in the country and it will be impossible to remove them all. However, the main issue is not to try to remove all guns but working to reduce the distribution of them. Why is it that people from lower economical statuses have easy access to militant rifles? If there is a reduced distribution of guns there will be a difference in homicide rates even if Wilson disagrees. Wilson states that having gun serves as self defense. (Wilson 2007) Even though he may seem right but many people always claim self defense when it really isn't. For example, Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman case was one of the biggest we ever seen. George followed Trayvon home one night which lead to a scuffle between the two and resulted into Trayvon being shot to death while George claimed self…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Accessibility of Guns Lead to Gun Crime,” written by Alan M. Ruben apprises us that firearms have one sole purpose and that is to cause harm, meaning committing an injury, homicides, or suicides. Most people believe that owning a firearm gives the reassurance that they are protected and no harm can come to them. Ruben shows statistics that guns are not the most secures ways of bringing protection, but it can actually bring danger. “States with the highest level of gun ownership have 114 percent higher firearm murder rates and 60 percent higher total homicide rates than states with the lowest gun ownership”(Ruben). Gun ownership has shown that there is more danger being brought upon rather than protection. Statistics have made an estimate that not every gun owner is capable of having the responsibility of a firearm. “It is estimated that over 40 percent of gun acquisitions occurs in the secondary market. That means that they happen without any background whatsoever… guns show rank the second to corrupt dealers” (Ruben). Not every person who purchases a firearm are trustworthy, some may have a negative use instead of a greater purpose.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, the FBI has released statistics that show that more people are killed by weapons other that guns, such as clubs and hammers. (Stand) If you think that banning guns will take them out of the hands of criminals, you’re mistaken. It has been proven that criminals don’t obey the rules that our society has put into place. They will get their hands on them through the black market, and then because we banned guns law abiding citizens will be defenseless. Imagine this scenario. You’re at Whataburger, a restaurant that has banned guns, enjoying a nice burger with your best friend. You look up from your conversation, and a man has walked in. He is wearing a black ski mask, and your stomach drops. He has an illegal gun, and it’s pointed right at you. “Hands up!” He shouts. No one moves in your defense, they just comply with the masked man’s order. The good people have left their weapons in the car, or at home to respect the company’s decision to have a gun free zone. You’re left at the mercy of this stranger, whose intentions are quite clear. Now imagine if the company hadn’t banned guns in their restaurant. That man sitting in the corner booth has his concealed handgun license, and could’ve stopped the crime as soon as the masked man had walked in. “You can’t blame an inanimate object that’s availability has absolutely no correlation to murder and expect it to end violence.”…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day, dozens or even hundreds of people find themselves victims of gun violence. 30,000 people on average are killed each year by firearms while 64% of all firearm deaths are suicides, and firearms are the third-leading cause of injury-related deaths nationwide. ("Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence," May 11, 2015). With those statistics, it would make sense why people think that gun control is the answer, and some regulations like background checks and increased penalties for those convicted of using guns in crimes are needed.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some gun advocates claim that they carry guns as a form of self-protection. However, this has been scientifically proven to be untrue. A study done by the University of Pennsylvania on the 677 shootings over the span of two and a half years indicate that people who carry guns are 4.5 times more likely to be shot than an unarmed person, and 4.2 times more likely to be killed by a gun (Callaway). The author claims that the reason for these statistics is that guns give people false senses of empowerment that make them overreact in volatile situations (Callaway). Carrying a gun not concealed is like painting a bull’s-eye(s) on oneself rather than self-defense, especially when it might foster delusions of empowerment. Even statics discourage gun possession; through legislating stricter gun laws, this can ensure public…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a big controversy about whether or not to have control over guns. One side of the controversy is that no citizen is allowed to have a gun in the house hold, only allowing the Army, Cops, and anyone with that power over the country. You also have the other side that the citizens are on, where many of the citizens use firearms for hunting, safety, and many other things. How could we take away firearms when so many people have and use them, “In the United States every 100 people 88.8% have firearms.” (ProCon.org “Gun Control ProCon.org”,1) The main reason the government is thinking to have gun control, is to decrease the lives that are getting taken away by these powerful tools that we use to have fun. Many people…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is easily linked to the availability of guns. The debate on whether guns are a tradition and a right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution or whether they are a dangerous contribution to the problems at hand make for an explosive argument. With a major outbreak of violence in our country, some people think that if we repeal the Second Amendment it would solve the problem. These people have two reasons; One, is the rising of violence amongst teenagers, the second, is their interpretation of the Second Amendment. The side opposing these views use arguments like how it would be impossible to repeal the Second Amendment, and we have a long history…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ”Nearly three weeks after the latest mass shooting claimed the lives of nine people, 52% of Americans now oppose stricter gun control laws, 6 percentage points more than the 46% of Americans who support such laws.”(diamond,2015).In the past year, there has been many shootings. If the guns are taken away, some of these could have been solved but that’s only solving one problem. Taking them isn’t helping the helpless people that can’t defend themselves without them.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Approximately 30,000 people die a year because of guns when they are used in both self defense and murder. Many people argue whether restrictions on guns should be enacted or repealed. Tensions have grown high on both sides of the issue making it a hot topic in our country today. Many people cast their votes in the last election based on their feelings about this very issue. The divide among Americans when it comes to gun control is large, spanning from those who want strict regulation, including an outright ban on all firearms, to those who want complete legalization of individual gun ownership. Guns can be used for killing or protection, so it is important to examine all…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gun Control Essay

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most people who own guns, are the legal owners of that weapon (“Kates”1). Other countries and some states in the United States that restrict gun laws have more murders than places that do not have gun laws (“Guns in”3). In the United Kingdom they banned handguns in 1997. Since then, the attack and crime rate went up 77%. This is equivalent to two attacks every two minutes. (“Guns in”3). This is further evidence that guns are not just for killing, guns are for…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opposing Gun Control Laws

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Watch out! Murder and mayhem is surely on the horizon as gun control laws are being dropped, and penalties could be imposed on those who do not comply. The debate over the use of guns in the United States can be traced back as far as 1791. The United States has the greatest percentage of private firearm ownership in the world. Most people do not just own one gun they own two or more guns. The average citizen comes to the realization that in order to deter and defend themselves and their loved ones against crimes, the burden becomes theirs. The police cannot protect every individual from a crime. The book “Dial 911 and Die”, through different stories, proves that citizens need to rely upon themselves for their own personal protection. Even though each state has its own individual gun control laws, there is no nationwide system of gun control. Criminals can very easily have someone buy a gun for them in a state with slack gun laws and then have it brought back to a state with stricter gun laws. With that being said, a gun that is locked in a gun cabinet, disabled, or even just unloaded is less readily available as one that is left loaded and ready to use. People should not have limited access to their guns in our society because it’s a person’s right to bear arms; in addition, opposing gun control laws does not lessen crime rates and it is counterproductive in saving lives.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun On Campus

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Studies show that people who resist a crime committed against them with a gun are less likely to get hurt (Kleck 3). Gun control has been shown to do only one thing, and that is to take the gun out of the hand of a potential victim. Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz wrote, “if self protection with a gun is commonplace, it means any type of gun control that disarms large numbers of prospective victims … will carry significant social cost in term of lost opportunities for self protection” (Kleck 2). Kleck and Gertz also found that in 1982, when interviewing incarcerated felons, 34% had been scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim (Kleck 19). If that many felons are being affected by people using a gun to defend themselves, not only are people successfully defending themselves, the people not reporting this information are basically helping the criminals by letting people think owning a gun and knowing how to use it does not help a victim. The reason people do not know this is because the government does not find it significant enough to report. The reason it is hard to prove that self protection using a gun works is because nobody reports the incident. The criminal, if not caught, does not report it. Also, victims do not report that they used a gun for fear that the police will harass them for using a gun. The government will not put the use of guns for self protection into its statistical model; because it is unwilling to admit that guns are useful for self defense. Guns are useful in preventing crime and they should be allowed on college…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each year, a number of people die from guns. The popular saying is “guns do not kill people, people kill people” which is true; however, guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence. As the number of gun owners in the world increases the government and its citizens would benefit from implementing stricter regulations regarding the safe keeping of guns in the home. The lack of gun safety results in the ability to access these guns with distressing outcomes. While many individuals argue that guns need to be restricted within the United States, the real argument is for allowing the Constitutional right to bear arms while implementing stricter laws to ensure these firearms do not fall within the wrong hands.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays