Preview

Summary of Kants categorical imperative

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1810 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary of Kants categorical imperative
Summary Immanuel Kant - “The moral law”

First, Kant presupposes that there is a moral law. That is, there exists some basis for morality beyond subjective description of it. He then begins with a series of identifications to answer how the moral law possibly gives a pure abstract form of a moral law that will ask if it is really moral. He says the only good thing that exists without qualifications is a good will (or good intentions). Other things may bring goodness, but always with qualifications. For example, happiness is a good thing in itself, but if there is a qualification that a happiness could be caused by harming someone, it is no longer good. Or perhaps we could say that someone is very ‘good’ at making money, but this does not necessarily imply overall ‘goodness’ (in the case of Wall Street banks, for example). This is a somewhat circular argument, in that he says that what is inherently ‘good’ (or moral) is a ‘good will’. He, thus, further defines it as: a good will acts for the sake of duty alone.
In other words, a good will does the right thing only for the reason that it is the right thing, and for no other reason. Not for happiness, personal gain, personal inclination, but only because it is ‘the right thing to do’. Kant sees this duty to ‘do the right thing’ as a triumph of reason in the struggle over superstition.
But what is ‘good will’? And how can we know what our ‘duty’ is? And will there be problems with always doing this ‘duty’, no matter the extenuating circumstances? Well,
Kant begins to answer these questions with another circular argument, saying that ‘duty’ is when someone acts in accordance with the ‘moral law’. This does not appear to clear up the confusion at all, if duty is defined by moral law, and vice versa, and we’re back where we started from. Kant continues, however, by proposing a solution in the form of a universal moral law that can be inserted as a sort of formula to determine the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Phil 1600 Ch 3 Questions

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This means that if one doesn’t obey the authority he will get punished. So moral decisions are made to avoid punishment.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legislation of ethics is not just a modern occurrence, but the feeling that an individual can do so is debatable. Just because an individual keeps the letter of the law, does not necessarily make him or her ethical. Graham (1995) argues that ethical decisions come not from those in authority (of which is the law), but are “independently arrived at principled beliefs that are used creatively in the analysis and resolution of moral dilemmas” (p. 47).…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    C. Lewis disproves the idea that the Moral Law is a herd instinct by showing that it is what directs ones instincts by comparing it to a piano which doesn’t have ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ notes, only notes that are right at certain times and wrong at others. (9-12)…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He says, “we shall take up the concept of duty though with certain subjective restrictions and hindrances rather bring it out by contrast and make it shine forth more brightly” (9). He divides the word duty into perfect and imperfect duties. Perfect duties, or “pure” (2) duties, are such things as do not murder or do not steal. Imperfect duties could be something like helping another in need. He then goes on to say that perfect duties never conflict with one another. Next that if a perfect and an imperfect duty coincide then one must act from the perfect duty. An example of this would be if to help another one would have to commit murder, then one must follow the perfect duty and not kill. This also means one would not help the other too. Lastly if the conflict is between two imperfect duties then one can choose between the two according to their own discretion. The process for defining ones duty is by looking at the…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1A. According to Kant, good will is the only thing that is absolutely good without qualification. Good will is the only thing that is unconditionally good. Good will is what makes all other good things truly good. Things can be good, but not without qualification. The will is good because the intention itself is good, rather than a desired result or some outside reasoning. All in all it is the honest and unselfish intention of a will.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Kant, he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives, as stated during class, act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory, I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life where having a good will can lead to tragic situations.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Analysis

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant believes that a good will is based on the attitude you have towards what you are doing; meaning that doing the right thing based on the fact that it’s the right thing to do is what makes up good will and doing what you think is good doesn’t mean that the act is actually good. This tides over…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To act from the good will is to act from the motive to do the right thing alone- regardless of any desires, wishes, expectations, or other concerns. To act from the good will is to act from the motive of duty.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To act out of respect for the moral law, in Kant’s view, is to be moved to act by moral requirements even when you are not moved by the moral law itself. Morality begins to depreciate when moral acts are done at the convenience of humankind, because the moral self, starts to lose sight of the importance of others, and what is the point of morality if it is not to enrich our own lives by helping…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    thinking. Simply put, this article claims that people act in “bad” ways for morally “good”…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Groundwork

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages

    To start off, a brief explanation of the ‘will’ seems important to understand the concept of a ‘good will’ that is first presented by Kant. A will carries intention to perform an action. When the will is free, it is free to act without regards to inclinations. When the will is good, a ‘good will,’ it makes a commitment to do what is right in any case, free from inclinations, in accordance with duty (duty will be discussed later). Kant starts off Section I of the Groundwork saying, ‘There is nothing that is possible to think of anywhere in the world, indeed even outside it, that can be held to be good without restriction except a good will.’ Here, Kant introduces the ‘good will’ and starts the foundation upon where the rest of Section I will follow. This statement suggests that anything seen as good,…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By no means does this impair individuals from engaging in this honorable behavior in certain instances when it is required, it simply means that this action is not morally obligated as a general universal principle.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deciding if an action is moral can vary greatly depending on which theory is applied in order to make a decision. A Divine Command Theorist would evaluate morality by consulting religious or sacred texts and by possibility consulting a religious authority on said texts. Through this approach the Divine Command Theorist would be looking for guidance from the “word of God” on the matter. A Natural Law Theorist on the other hand would attempt to decide if an action is moral by deciding the action's purpose and how it fits with the natural working order of the world, this idea is often coupled with the influence of religion as it's ideas are incorporated into many religions like Christianity. They would try through their version of science to…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays