Not only this, we intended our performance to explore natural realistic style of Stanislavsky to capture the constant pressure we are facing as modern people of an unpredictable era of human civilisation, such as metaphorically referring to the ‘seven deadly sins’ to the pressures of students within education, on the contrary, the pressures of authority with the uprising of men (e.g. London Riots).
Yet, through query-seeking dialogue at the end of our performance with our audience, one of the audience members told us “I think the monologues were put together really well as it shows us more about the character.” I was really pleased with this feedback as it related to our key aims for the performance, especially the thought-captivating aim as the audience clearly states that he was interested to learn more about the …show more content…
“the legacy I have left behind will continue..” This is a plot-hole because there is no legacy to continue; it is the end of the world, judgement day. I told the audience this error and asked them if they noticed it, and all of them said they didn’t notice because the emphasis at that moment of the monologue wasn’t the dialogue but the emotional response of reacting of being sent to hell that got their attention the most.
Coupled with, using the philosophy of Stanislavsky’s theory, I honesty believe helped us a lot, me especially because it got me away with a mistake that I was worried about. I believe our portrayal of our characters was the best it could have been considering we came across constant delays in our performance because of a group member leaving the school the very last