Not only this, but “the farmers profit margin dropped from 35% in the 1950 's to about 9% today.” (Mckibben, 54) This means that “to generate the same income as it did in 1950, a farm today would need to be roughly four times as large.” (Mckibben, 55) As a result of this perpetual growth and centralization, problems like “huge sewage lagoons, miserable animals, vulnerability to sabotage and food-born illness”(mckibben, 61) have become commonplace. Not only this, but “we are running out of the two basic ingredients we need to grow food on an industrial scale: oil and water.” (Mckibben, 62) The situation has become so dire that “we are now facing a near simultaneous depletion of the underground aquifers which have been responsible for the unsustainable, artificial inflation of food production.” At this point of realization, Mckibben begins indulging the reader in a large number of facts that promote a more localized form of farming as the solution to a seemingly endless number of issues. Initially the point is raised that “sustainable agriculture leads to a 93% increase in per-hectare food production.” (Mckibben, 68) The next idea raised is that, “since World War 1, it has been cheaper to use…
The first Ted Talk was about ben dunlap and his many Hungarian mentors. He mostly focused on Mr. Sandor Teszler and is the current president of Wofford College. His uncle Henry was living under a death threat from the Ku Klux Klan. His uncle did a very Hungarian act by moving his family to Massachusetts so that he could face the Ku Klan Klan alone in South Carolina. Thinking about it, I pretty sure I would do the same thing being in his situation. Hungarians have their own equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan which I found disturbing. Dunlap states that, “Sandor Teszler somewhat resembles Mahatma Gandhi, minus the loincloth and plus orthopedic boots.” He was teased for having two club feet.…
An analysis by Rich Pirog, who works for the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, reveals that “transportation accounts for only 11% of food’s carbon footprint” (Source C). The way locavores manipulate the calculation of food miles to fit their argument is highly inaccurate. For example, “a shipper sending a truck with 2,000 apples over 2,000 miles would consume the same amount of fuel per apple as a local farmer who takes a pickup 50 miles to sell 50 apples” (Source C). Eating locally is not a solution to lessening food’s carbon footprint, “[t]he critical measure [in this scenario] is not food miles, but rather apples per gallon” (Source C). He further claims that “[a] fourth of the energy required to produce food is expended in the consumer’s kitchen” (Source C). This statement is further illustrated in the chart in Source D. This visual representation validates how production is more of an impact when considering the “total greenhouse gas emissions” to “household food consumption” (Source D). By taking the oath to become a locavore, people are also taking a pledge to unknowingly increase the CO2 emissions in the atmosphere by eating…
When I was asked to search my kitchen and the supermarket I expected to see some healthy food, some non-healthy food, and a variety of different ingredients that were used in each product, but what I came to find was a shock to me. To my surprise, I found a common ingredient in most of my food, corn. It shocked me because of all the negative facts, experiences, and examples given in Michael Pollan’s book, The Omnivores Dilemma. Never would I have ever thought I consumed as much corn as I realized I do. After reading the book, it has brought to my attention how bad corn related ingredients really effects what we consume in a more or less negative way.…
Can a gamer apply their online skills and traits to real life situations that will solve many of the world's problems? In the TED Talk “Gaming can make a better world” American game designer and author Jane Mcgonigal places much emphasis on the topic of productivity through gaming. She believes that “if the rewards to create a better world, were similar to an online game, then more gamers would be willing to take action to better society”(3:30). She adopts a provocative tone in the form of “creating a better world” in order to engage the viewers. Mcgonigal gets her point across effectively by establishing that skills spent in gaming can be translated into skills used to create real world; however, she doesn't give any inspiring solutions…
People are often at odds to choose between food like organic verses inorganic food or products. And what is the difference and is one actually better for you or is just there to makes it easier for you to justify eating it If you think one is not using the industrial food chain. After reading "The Omnivore's Dilemma", my own personal opinion about the food industry and that many Americans don’t know how or how our food is even processed and grown or raised or how it gets to the grocery store. An example I love is my mom is a kindergarten teacher and she was doing a lesson on food and where our food comes from and the kids new that food comes from a grocery store and that was it. They had no clue that they food they eat had to be grown somewhere else and then brought to the store for them to buy. The next question was who like chicken nuggets and they all raise their hands and then she asked what is a chicken nugget and none of them could answer her. When my mom said they come chickens all they kids were grossed out and said they don’t eat chickens. This just shows today that kids aren’t being told how their food gets to their plate and I feel that this is a very important concept for people to know not just kids. Going along with that people don’t know how food affects out bodies and after reading this book it makes you think about what you eat a lot…
A couple of those ideas include “the Locavore diet” (p. 182) and “the eater as co-producer” concept (p. 190), both of which adopt the farm-to-table approach, which is part of the justice-oriented value chain (p. 184). The underlying objective is to promote local farming and provide fresh, nutritious, unadulterated food to the community, which can increase mental alertness, physical activity, and overall good health, while reducing diet-related illnesses, girth growth, and obesity (pp. 65, 190-191).…
There will always be environmental issues that exist, but the small steps can be taken in order to reduce them. There is so much more to farming than just the crops that are produced. Taking a look at some of the negative effects of large farms, many of them can be reduced. Burning fossil fuels releases many dangerous green house gases, which is causing the global warming phenomenon. Spriggs elaborates in her essay that the…
In a section his book, Michael Pollan focuses on the corn industry. He finds of the “forty-five thousand items in the average American supermarket...more than a quarter of them now contain corn ” Although these cheap foods can conveniently be found at any supermarket, constantly eating this food is destructive to ourselves . America is currently the world leader in obesity and it is because we heavily rely on corn to fatten our animals or to become the main component of processed food. And because the “cheap corn [keeps] flowing, guaranteeing that the cheapest calories in the supermarket will continue to be the unhealthiest”, families in poverty will have no choice, but to eat the cheap yet affordable foods, leading to obesity.…
The author starts off strong with logos, which appeals to logic. In response to the comments about animals in our food production, she writes, “the studies show only that the prevailing methods of producing meat — that is, crowding animals together in factory farms, storing their waste in giant lagoons and cutting down forests to grow crops to feed them — cause substantial greenhouse gases” (Niman), meaning that small farms and farms can cut down on greenhouse gases if, “they keep their animals outdoors on pasture and make little use of machinery.” (Niman) She points out, “In contrast to traditional farms, industrial livestock and poultry facilities keep animals in buildings with mechanized systems for feeding, lighting, sewage flushing, ventilation, heating and cooling, all of which generate emissions,” which are what most statistics pointing the guilt finger at meat production are referring to. The author, being a “rancher…who raises cattle, goats and turkeys the traditional way (on grass)” (Niman), neatly brushes off relations of “meat (especially beef) is closely linked to global warming” (Niman), to her own farm. Meat and dairy would certainly win the greenhouse gas competition if not…
The article, “Vegetarian is the New Prius”, written by Kathy Freston, discusses the amount of contribution that livestock actively plays in the most crucial and serious environmental problem, from a local scale to global scale. Freston writes that the amount of livestock raised in United States soil is the main cause of air pollution, land degradation, water shortage, water pollution, biodiversity, and especially aids to global warming. This article attempts to convince readers to cut meat out of their diet and to become vegetarians, so that less livestock would be raised to feed the people and environmental issues would be cut down. Although it is true that Freston provides the audience with solid, legitimate factual arguments concerning the brutal slaughtering and consumption of livestock by humans, she fails to address the opposing argument. Although I am a personal fan of vegetarian foods, I disagree with Freston, primarily because my family has raised me on chicken and other meats. I believe that there will be livestock whether a lot of people change their diets and become vegetarians or not. At the University of Chicago, researches concluded that feeding animals for the production of meat, eggs, and dairy products requires growing upwards of ten times as many crops needed than if we just went without livestock. According to a report done by the United Nations animal agriculture takes up 70% of all agricultural land, and 30% of the total land surface of the planet. Upon seeing these disturbing facts, I do not believe that society will never 100% convert to a vegetarian lifestyle. Even if they do, there will still be millions of wild animals producing all of the same gases that are so harmful to our environment.…
In the last thirty years as the government has changed its position from limiting the production of certain crops like corn, to encouraging over production. Engineering lower prices and through them a decrease in the average amount of our budget that is devoted to food. This generation spends only about 17% of their budget on food, considerably less than any other generation in history. However, this cheap food has led to the most obese and diabetic-inclined generation ever; is having the low food cost worth the externalities that come along with the long term health care costs that come accompany this diet? Not to mention, these procedures are destroying the small farmer, the only profit to be found comes from the government subsides, making it impossible for anyone but huge operations to…
Although, society is remissive to learn more about how food is made and the population is becoming more and more lazy as time goes on. Everything has an impact on society, including the production of food, the prices of food, passiveness in consumers, the consumer’s right to know what they are eating and how people have the ability to educate themselves on this serious matter, but choose to ignore it. If society would begin to learn more about food production, there would be a change in how Americans eat, produce, and think about food. Society would also become less obese and many people’s health problems would start to…
As technology grows, so does the percent of obese population. For hundreds of years, lack of food had been the demise of millions, now obesity is considered a public health crisis, and only for the past couple of decades. Only after technological advances in the 18th century did people start to have a more readily available source of sustenance. At the time, these advances helped people to live longer, and to have better nutrition. Unfortunately, over time this was not found to be the case. Big advances to agricultural technology like the Reaper, pesticides, and even larger corporations like Monsanto have been proven to produce more food than needed, and on top of this, most of the food produced by these corporations get processed into something unhealthy via large industrial machines. "The initial effect of these advances in improved public health and amount, quality, and variety of food was increased longevity and body size. These early favorable outcomes of technological advances notwithstanding, their incremental effect since the Second World War has been an overabundance of easily accessible food, coupled with reduced physical activity, that accounts for the recent increased prevalence of obesity,"(Eknoyan n.Pg.) says Garabed Eknoyan of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. He is an editor for the Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, and published an article on the…
In the Ted talk, Sherry Turkle talks about how with the rise of technology we are experiencing a change in the dynamic of relationships we have with each other. Instead of interacting with one another in group settings, such as classes or meetings, we are on our phone, computer, or tablet. She brings up the topic of being together while not really being together. People are more likely to hide away in their phones than to engage in conversation with one another. Turkle explains the idea that many people have about conversations are that they are too unpredictable. Unlike texting, emailing, or instant messaging we can’t delete or edit what we say since it is in real time. I can vouch for this because for example in an argument where things can get heated very quickly, by texting I can take a time out or delete something that I shouldn’t say. Arguing face to face is much more risky because I can’t take a second to cool off or to figure out the right way to say something.…