The Innocent Man is non-fiction examining several particularly unjust criminal convictions in the Oklahoma justice system. But as non-fiction, you will not believe how innocent people can be railroaded onto death row on almost no evidence whatsoever, coerced confessions and unscrupulous prosecutors who want someone's head on a stick without truly looking for the killer.…
Killing the president is a bad choice and all the people that were involved in killing the president should be punished. George Atzerodt was told and forced to kill Lincoln, but in the end he did not, but he still deserves a punishment for being part of the group that killed him, but, he should not have a big punishment like most other people. I think George Atzerodt needs to be in jail for about 3-5 years, so he would not get in another group of people and be forced to kill someone again. Lewis Powell had to murder the secretary of state seward. They all didn’t have a choice, Booth was a tough leader and he was very strict about his goal.…
There are some moments when killing can be justified, though it rarely is. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the two main characters have the same mentality but different point of views on killing. Sanger Rainsford is an intelligent, professional “Big Game Hunter” that hunts a large variety of animals. General Zaroff is a sociopathic “Dangerous Game Hunter” that finds great interest in hunting human beings. In this story, Sanger Rainsford hunted animals which was proven rationalized where as General Zaroff hunted humans which was proven unjustified.…
A deeply religious American Indian soldier in Alpha Company who is respected and loved by the entire platoon. His death deeply affects O’Brien, as well as other soldiers.…
In the "case of the shipwrecked sailors", three men were marooned after the sinking of an oil tanker. Subject to extreme conditions and starvation, the men drew lots after about twenty five days and decided that the loser would be killed and eaten as food. When one of the men lost the draw, he pulled out his consent, and the other two men killed him anyway, eating him. Five days later, the remaining two men were rescued and ensuing actions incurred their murder charges. This seems to be a simple case over the battle of life and death, and it truly is. The two men, Dudley and Stephens, made a conscious decision to commit not only the crime of murder, but the atrocity of cannibalism. Crime is crime and law is law- when breaks a law and commits a crime, a punishment must ensue.…
In order to understand if killing someone is justifiable you need to put yourself in someone’s situation. Imagine you’re in a car accident with your best friend, and she’s injured severely. In this moment, she knows she’s dying an uncomfortable death, your friend tells you to end their pain. As she takes possibly her last gasps of air, you have a decision to make, end or keep her life as this is a 50/50 chance situation. This would be one example of a justifiable act, along with situations such as war ethics, hunting for sport, and in the case of George and Lennie.…
Is killing justified? When is killing justified? Killing is justified because some people do things to get the death penalty. In the book (Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck) there are these 2 characters who get this job in California and the big guy, Lennie, kills the boss's son’s (Curley) wife. So George, went to find him and he shot Lennie because he killed Curley’s wife and it was either he kill Lennie or Curley and the others.…
The argument that it is only acceptable to kill someone if they truly deserve death for their actions is prominent in the television series Dexter, however this does not hold true in our country today in regards to the death penalty due to lack of evidence, lack of fair trial, and unjust reasons for killing.…
You know that moment when you see a guy on the street trying to rape a girl, no probably not… but if you did, wouldn’t you help the victim out? If a man was doing those actions or something like it he should be put down, doesn’t matter if it’s by the police or a random person. by the general understanding of murder, is it counted as murder when the person is so dumb he won’t know what happened, basically putting him out of his misery. If a man kills a person, that said person deserves death as well, it’s an eye for an eye deal, George should not be punished for doing what was right, George always knew Lennie would screw everything up, Lennie doesn’t even understand what he did, mot importantly, Lennie felt no pain.…
Relationship with the lieutenant, Ishmeal looked up to his lieutenant as a father figure. Ishmeal would usually look forward to seeing him and spending time with his lieutenant. “I was looking forward to seeing the lieutenant. I hope we might find some time to talk about Shakespeare.” I believe that Ishmeal looked up to the lieutenant as a father because he lost his real father and he would usually ignore Ishmeal. Ishmeal worshiped the lieutenant because he saved his live when Ishmeal was shot through his legs. Ishmeal would have died from the pain but the lieutenant ordered the doctor and two other men to save his live, “do not let the boy die”. Ishmeal believed that the lieutenant cared for him and Ishmeal wanted to survive so that he can fight as hard as he can for the lieutenant. Ishmeal developed more feelings for his squad as well.…
There is a very thin line drawn in the debate whether or not death to another person is ever justifiable. There are so many different cases where I have a double sided opinion. I ultimately think that reasons for death such as euthanasia, abortion, acting in self-defense, etc. really depend on the circumstances of the situation. Webster’s dictionary defined murder as "the unlawful killing of another human being, especially with premeditated malice." What exactly is justifiable killing? Is abortion Okay? What about euthanasia, self-defense, war, or capital punishment? No I am not a believer in war, abortion nor do I think that taking another’s life is the absolute best decision. However if someone is putting your life or your loved ones life at harm, is that a reasonable clause, to use self-defense to protect your own life? I do believe it can be justified, but not always justifiable.…
But the death penalty is uncivil, particularly when the person is wrongfully accused. The death penalty has left many innocent people dead. It is not right to punish someone when they are innocent.…
someone out of revenge for wrong doing of themselves is not justified with the death penalty. There are…
In order to decide if killing is ever a justifiable act, you must be in a position where it would actually make sense to. For example, imagine your mom or dad is in the hospital and has been on life support for a few months now. The doctor says they may never wake up again, so what do you do? Do you pull the plug and release the pain forever or keep them on longer to see if they will wake up? Say it’s been a year now, would you change your mind if you picked the second answer? With that said, in certain situations, killing another is a justifiable act for moral reasons, such as Euthanasia, Capital Punishment, and in the case of George and Lennie.…
Crimes interfere with the peace and order of a society. Appropriate punishment which is just and equitable can restore the peace and order. Making the criminal pay for the crime with an equivalent punishment is acceptable. But killing a person who killed another person is just making the violent act again in another form.…