Similar to Machiavelli in Hell, this work, Black describes, as an intellectual biography. Throughout his work, Machiavelli, published in 2013, he constantly attacks the notion that Machiavelli respected his Judeo-Christian upbringing and states in numerous lines of his adherence to what defines atheism, even though Viroli and others do not subscribe to the possibility in the period. His major argument can be summarized in his introduction, noting, “Machiavelli regarded morality and religion as a cloak to be exploited to promote or vindicate the ruler or state; morality and religion were key tools that regularly had to be subverted for selfish ends.” His argument reads deeply into the cynical and ironic trend of reading history regarding Machiavelli’s works rather than offering a literal translation of the texts, making works like Viroli and De Grazia seem a bit white-washed, despite the
Similar to Machiavelli in Hell, this work, Black describes, as an intellectual biography. Throughout his work, Machiavelli, published in 2013, he constantly attacks the notion that Machiavelli respected his Judeo-Christian upbringing and states in numerous lines of his adherence to what defines atheism, even though Viroli and others do not subscribe to the possibility in the period. His major argument can be summarized in his introduction, noting, “Machiavelli regarded morality and religion as a cloak to be exploited to promote or vindicate the ruler or state; morality and religion were key tools that regularly had to be subverted for selfish ends.” His argument reads deeply into the cynical and ironic trend of reading history regarding Machiavelli’s works rather than offering a literal translation of the texts, making works like Viroli and De Grazia seem a bit white-washed, despite the