establishes a tone of humor by pointing his own flaws and weaknesses out instead of others.…
Even the way that he "swung the old peak way around to the back" noting that he felt this to be "-very corny...but he liked it that way" shows that he wants to feel comfortable in being different than those he deems…
Throughout the whole article, the author is giving off a frank somewhat forthright tone to justify…
Every person will always have a stance on some kind of topic, however the more informed we are about that topic we can often have more passion for our side. This is definitively seen when regarding sports journalist Frank Deford and his passionate argument with respect to Pete Rose. In one of his articles published in a 2002 edition of Sports Illustrated he attempts to educate the reader as to why Pete Rose should be placed in the Hall Of Fame through a rather unusual form of argumentation. This atypical argumentation first begins with a sense of exigence, he informs the reader that it is hall of fame induction time once again attempting to set a base for the situation. There is also a sense sarcasm as well as pathos introduced by our writer,…
Since much of Grigsby’s work is filled with opinionated fervor for the topics that she discusses, she regularly relies on the rhetorical appeal pathos to signify the tone and theme used in her columns. Furthermore, Grigsby also employs the use of adequate diction to aid the central focus of her columns, and she also sufficiently acknowledges the opposition’s counter argument and rebuffs their claim. With the use of these rhetorical strategies, Grigsby presents a strong unyielding reason as to why she stands firm by the assertions she makes in her…
He amplifies traditional senses of dissonances to create a sound world approaching atonality or polytonality. This is emphasized through reinforcing a traditional diminished seventh chord with embellishing chord tones with trills, building additional triads from existing chord tones and building melodic material from intervals present in the diminished seventh (see Ex. 6).…
change. The use of pathos he uses almost condemns people that contradict him to a loss of…
At first notice he employs a feeling of simple impersonation and innocent humor. However, after listening, one begins to realize that his impersonation goes much deeper. Secondary thoughts begin to surface and innocent humor turns into harsh ridicule and mockery. He speaks on old people, children, Jews, Irish, African Americans (which he refers to as "niggers"), and Italians. Each group is addressed as the scum of the earth. He takes stereotypes and prejudices and gives them a voice. His phrases and word usage have a bold honesty to them. He consistently speaks of making groups "just go away." But he abstains from his harsh comments by repeating that they would not have to leave by blood shed. This effectively adds to the arrogance of his character and truly reveals the power of satire. Another action he consistently refers to is spitting on certain groups. He sets up why he dislikes each group. Then, whether it is the drunken Irish, Italian criminals, or slow old people, he then follows with stating that if he were to see these groups he would just "spit on them." This is reintroduced over and over again to remind the audience that they are dealing with an obnoxious person. This technique also reinforces the arrogance of his character in that it shows that he lacks the will to come up with intelligent solutions or justification for his…
The speaker addressed argument by first trying to dampen his opponents reputation by saying negative things about him. Then he worked his angle in a positive way by saying he is there for the working class man and will do his best…
In the case of Slater’s essay, his audience primarily consists of subscribers, or readers, of a local Twin Cities newspaper. Thus, the scope of this audience permits Slater to utilize the various characteristics typical of plain-style. Slater’s execution of each these aspects, however; comes with varying degrees of success. Aside from a few scattered anomalies, the overall vocabulary of Slater’s essay does not rise above the expected standard reading level of most educated Americans. For example, he may utilize such words as “inveighing” or “apropos” but their unfamiliarly does not impede the understanding of his overall message (Slater 391, 395). Being that Slater’s audience consists mainly of this genre of individuals, this not only an appropriate stylistic choice on his part, but an educated one. Not surprisingly, composing with a colloquial vocabulary makes Slater’s argument more accessible, and thereby, more intriguing to his intended readers. And, considering that a significant part of persuading an audience consists of having them agree with one’s ideas, the value of accessibility becomes even more…
Even though the writer is very firm in her stance, throughout the article, she did not use a harsh tone. Instead, she uses a passive tone to convey her message. Also, she did not force her perspective on her audience but she gave room for her readers to develop their own opinions. She uses a “third person” pronoun, removing the subjectivity of the article and used first person pronouns only when she provided personal experience. She also kept each paragraph short and simple, to prevent overloading, of information for the readers and kept the flow of the article smooth. Thus, it’s a more effective way of…
The worn path written by Eudora Welty (1941) is a great short story about Phoenix Jackson, an old African American woman who beats all odds to make a trip into town for medicine for her grandson, she overcomes many challenges that test her courage and will. Because of her loyalty and love, Phoenix has sacrificed her own well-being on this dangerous path for the well-being of her grandson.…
Jasper’s voice is far more colloquial than Charlie’s. He uses a range of ‘Australianisms’ that Charlie does not have: ‘carn’, ‘fersure’, ‘unnerstand’, ‘nuthin’, ‘somethink’, ‘orright’.…
In Paul Krugman’s Confronting Inequality, we are told, as citizens of the United States, the damages of high and rising inequality within our country. Krugman describes America as a place of unclear economic progress for the middle class while the share of economic growth in the past 3 decades has gone to the wealthy 1%. Krugman next describes the impact such inequality has on our society and republic. First starting with social inequality, he states “The fact is the vast income inequality inevitably brings vast social inequality inevitably brings vast social inequality in its train” (589). What Krugman is trying to convey is that as the gap between classes grows, it brings with it greater and greater inequality.…
So we know he is well educated and reliable with his sources. He tries to provide logical argument. But his opinion overshadows his efforts, and he comes off looking like a popular culture groupie. He succeeds at making the proponents look irresponsible, and he doesn 't waver in his position at all. His contentious article is more of a political antithesis than a proclamation of improving gun legislation or auditing military…