Preview

Summary Of Profits Without Prosperity By William Lazonick

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Profits Without Prosperity By William Lazonick
Profits without Prosperity
In the article “Profits without Prosperity” published by the Harvard Business Review, William Lazonick describes the alarming effects of huge stock buybacks by the top management. Among these problems includes loss of shareholder value, clear disinvestment, crippled ability to modernize, obliteration of jobs, exploitation of employees, payout gains for activist insiders, speedily growing disparity, persistent economic stagnation as well as runaway executive compensation. In the article, William refers to these buybacks as a social, economic and moral disaster as they entail effective stock-price manipulation.
Lazonick continues to say that instead of generating value for their companies, shareholders, and society,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUSLAWDIS7

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chapter 35 discusses many concepts related to shareholders that you’ve probably heard in sound bites on the news. The concepts, however, are more important than mere sound bites as the ramifications for corporations, shareholder, and our economy are significant. As the intro to the Chapter illustrates, everyone is all too familiar with the rise and fall of Enron. Unfortunately, Enron is not the only corporation with management, shareholder, and earnings troubles.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Acct3102 Case Study Example

    • 7710 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Richards adopts a teleological-parochialism position 1 to justify that his actions are ethical, 2 even though they are illegal (Baugher & Weisbord, 2009). 3 Richards argues that his actions are ethical as they resulted in desirable consequences, in the form of better sales/performance figures, which met analyst forecasts and positively affected shareholder value (Radtke, 2004; Fernando, Dharmage, & Almeida, 2008). 4 He acted in the interests of his ‘in-group’ (other executives/managers), maximising their performance-based compensation, 5 at the expense of others (Barnett, Bass, & Brown, 1994). 6 Richards also claims that his actions were not serious, as recognising revenues earlier was simply a timing issue, 7 and was common practice in the software industry. 8 Furthermore, his actions are not as serious as other well-publicised corporate scandals. 9 Richards did not adopt a deontological position, as he was not concerned about following rules (Baugher & Weisbord, 2009). 10…

    • 7710 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into the early 1900s, most managers seemed content to work toward maximizing shareholder wealth in return for large salaries. However, by the 1920s, this accord had changed drastically. Insider trading, stock price manipulation and diversion of corporate funds for personal use was rampant. The goal of the organization had shifted to maximizing the interests of management. Recognizing these abuses and a need for change, Congress enacted the Securities Act of 1933, which, among other restrictions, outlawed insider trading and other attempts to manipulate the market. This act and the establishment of the SEC in 1934 helped to reduce the agency conflict between owners and managers. During the 1960s and 1970s, senior management compensation was more typically tied to the size of the firm: the bigger the firm, the bigger the salary. This ushered in a new goal for the corporation, at least from management’s perspective, to seek rapid expansion of the firm with little concern for risk, profitability, cost, or stock price. During this time, managers spent lavishly on themselves even when their companies were in financial trouble. The 1980s saw another shift with the beginning of the shareholder value…

    • 867 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second part then takes the reader up to and through the 1990’s, when stock options became the method of compensation for executives and when the number became the most important aspect of the quarterly financial reports. Berenson also leads the reader through the resulting cases of fraud and accounting sleight of hand when he discusses companies like Lucent, Enron, Tyco, WorldCom and Green Tree Financial. In addition, in this part of the book he discusses accounting firms, specifically the Big Eight, and the introduction of price competition among them as well as the transformation they made from accounting firms to service organizations, causing them to sacrifice independence for money. Part two ends with the bust that followed the late 1990’s and the paltry steps that were then taken by the…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dunlap Case

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The compensation package achieved Sunbeam’s goals of maximizing shareholders wealth. It motivated Dunlap to drive up the price of the stock. Although the short term profits benefited shareholders, no incentives to create a long term, profitable company existed. In fact, it gave Dunlap an even bigger incentive to sell the company once the stock price reached a high, favorable value. Dunlap’s compensation package consisted of little to no risk and had a ten year term. The restricted stock rewards became vested in two years. His purchase of 244,898 shares indicated that profits would drastically increase. Dunlap’s compensation package affected thousands of employees at Sunbeam. The compensation package favored shareholders but disfavored employees. They had no value in this model. The compensation package only protected shareholders wealth. The structure of Dunlap’s compensation package was aligned his views of shareholder primacy. He sacrificed values for a boost in stock price and economic efficiency. The stockholders of Sunbeam greatly profited, and Dunlap reaped a majority of the benefits. The compensation package should relate to performance in order to produce the right incentives. The compensation package provided Dunlap with an excessive amount of shares of stock and stock rewards, but at least it provided an…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which of the following is NOT normally regarded as being a barrier to hostile takeovers? (Points : 5)…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because much of this gross compensation is tied to the performance of the company and the company’s stock, the CEOs’ chase after the rainbow brings benefits that spillover to many. And while CEO compensation can often seem obscene, at least there is tangible productivity, in contrast to the spoiled celebrity or government-lobbying lawyer or the regulation-skirting financier. Regardless, the essential question is what has each of us done with the talents and resources God has entrusted to us?” (Stapleford, 2009, p. 136).…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Executive compensation has been at the forefront of discussion for a long period of time. Analyzed by academics, highlighted by the media, questioned by Congress, and scrutinized by the general public, the topic warrants much debate. In the 1990’s, total executive compensation increased substantially as companies began offering stock option programs; CEO’s of S&P 500 saw an average increase of 150%.1…

    • 2571 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inside the Meltdown

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The stock of a global investment company, Bear Stearns, began to drop drastically on March 10th, 2008. A share of Bear Stearns was as high as $171 and by the afternoon dropped to $57. Former CEO of the company, Ace Greenberg, tells CNBC that all of these rumors are “ridiculous.” As time goes on, Bear Stearns’ cash reserves were disappearing and people invested in the company were immediately withdrawing. Bear Stearns was basically racing to find a company to buy them out or they would go under. Current CEO of Bear Stearns, Alan Schwartz, got ahold of JP Morgan’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, to buy out Bear. A ton of government officials come to Bear to look over their records and it is not a pretty sight. Bear was deep in toxic assets. The Federal Reserve was prohibited from lending any money to Bear so they used JP Morgan to bail out Bear Stearns. Unfortunately the company could not be saved and Bear Stearns was gone after being sold to JP Morgan at $2 per share.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Paper--Bailout

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It stands to reason to ask: Is it ethical for companies who have benefited from government bailouts to reward themselves with bonuses? Answering this question is not simple. The ethical dilemma pits the sanctity of bonus contracts against the American government’s interest in maintaining a stable economy. Companies fear losing crucial employees if bonuses are cut too deeply. Critics of bailout bonuses, such as Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), ask: “Bonuses for what?” (Johnston, para 13). The question is commonly asked because these “crucial” executives are ironically seen as the likely culprits responsible for the ongoing financial crisis. On the other hand, proponents argue that interfering with the bonuses constitutes a violation of “sacred” contracts (Collins, para 4). Although there may be legal claims to bonuses, some of their moral aspects do not stand to scrutiny. This ethical dilemma can be best understood by applying ethical standards such as the Rights and Common Good Approaches.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Policy Paper Sarbanes-Oxley

    • 5149 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The corporate scandals in the year 2001 of Enron and WorldCom, where Enron was able to produce fake reports of high profits with false accounting methods and WorldCom, who artificially reduced their expenses to falsely increase in the appearance of their revenues, created a market failure. Major stakeholders such as investors, government,…

    • 5149 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Myers, Worldcom

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    WorldCom was America 's second largest telecom company in 2000 (The WorldCom Accounting Scandal, 2002). Making a modest beginning in the hinterland of Mississippi in 1983 with a meager capital of less than 100,000 USD it reached the pinnacle of corporate success reporting more than USD 39 billion in revenue and USD 150 million in MCAP (The WorldCom Accounting Scandal, 2002). In the process it became 42nd in the Fortune 500 list. Under the leadership of CEO Bernie Ebbers it grew rapidly by means of acquisitions and increased demand for telecom services farther fuelled the growth of WorldCom during the whole of 90s. However on June 25, 2002, WorldCom announced that it had overstated earnings in 2001 and the first quarter of 2002 by more than $3.8 billion (The WorldCom Accounting Scandal, 2002).…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Walt Pavlo Case analysis

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case is a best example of how ethical behavior at top management plays such an importance role in the success or failures of its employees and the organization as a whole. MCI’s upper management was not concerned about ethics; their main focus was to boost its profits to meet Wall Street’s expectations. It was evident that the culture at MCI did not recognize or act against misconduct which created negative work environment. When management put pressure on their employees to meet unrealistic goals and forcing them to do whatever to get the job done will essentially force the employees to unethical practices to meet their targets, and in most cases employees do so to save their job. MCI’s aggressive sales and marketing programs, management preoccupied with meeting analyst expectations, neither conducting proper background checks nor reporting known customer fraud to authorities and shareholders are the best examples of negative work environment and unethical practice.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pummeled by the bind of a painful recession and furious over oversized executive compensation packages at the very Wall Street firms widely blamed for the economic chaos, they gradually distrust key establishments and individual leaders. Americans are angered at the financial services region. They believe that these institutions have rigged the game so that top level executives are rewarded substantially even when they fail. Americans want action to restore fairness to the system and get pay back in line. The variety of experts and activists of political leaders and ordinary citizens, there is a belief that executive incentives have exaggerated short-term perfor¬mance, supported unnecessary risk-taking, and failed to discipline poor performance. Many believe that incentive plans have tempted some CEOs to put personal financial interests in front of good stewardship that provides the long-term interests of their organizations (Ethics Resource Center,…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “It is precisely this fiction-that the singular and primary purpose of the firm is to create value (in the form of a rising stock price) for its shareholders, who are problematically conceptualized as “the owners” - that has allowed corporate America to be shorn from? its job-creating potential and commitment to employment and other stakeholders and to be mined as a collection of financial assets for elite and private gain” (Ho 2). This argument by Ho brings up many points. Over the last few decades, companies have come under more pressure to deliver quarterly results that are pleasing to investors. In placating investors, however, employees can get hurt. When inflation rises or a company must cut costs, companies typically fire employees. CEOs are incentivized to appease Wall Street because they benefit from a rise in their company’s stocks, and their fiduciary duty pushes them to generate returns. They aren’t rewarded for retaining employees even if it is morally right, and management is far more concerned about the company’s performance than the economy’s performance. Also, poor people often do not own stocks. Even with the rallying of the market with Trump’s win in the polls, Trump’s base likely did not benefit much. Wealthy people are more likely to own stocks than poor people. Trump’s wealthy supporters enjoyed lower taxes and higher stock prices.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays