Preview

Summary Of Risse's 'On The Morality Of Immigration'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Risse's 'On The Morality Of Immigration'
In, “On the Morality of Immigration”, Risse claims that the kind of immigration policy we currently have is immoral and that people who cross the border into the United States aren’t doing anything wrong. Risse does provide good arguments for having much more open borders for immigrants. The most important objection to Risse’s position is the objection that is raised by Pevnick and Cafaro. The objection they raise states that Risse fails to note the distinction between natural resources and social/political resources. Risse has certain points in his response to the objection that do make sense, but I believe his response overall is unsuccessful. Risse’s first argument is the good usage argument. The good usage argument is composed of 5 …show more content…
Risse contends 5 main points in the egalitarian ownership argument. The first point of the argument is that natural resources are the accomplishment of no one. Some examples of natural resources are oil, gas, minerals, etc. The second point of the argument is everyone has a symmetrical relationship to the natural resource. National boundaries are arbitrary with regard to natural resources. The third point of the argument is it is unjustified to exclude someone from part of the earth if natural resources on that part are being underused. The fourth point of the argument is that the Unites States is underusing its natural resources. Risse explains this point with the use of his results from the comparison of population and the results for the population per square mile. The fifth point in the argument is that it is unjustified to exclude would-be immigrants from the United …show more content…
Pevnick and Cafaro argue that Risse fails to note the distinction between natural resources and social/political resources. Pevnick and Cafaro believe that social and political resources are more important than natural resources. They describe social and political resources as law and order, markets, education, rights and freedoms, and an uncorrupt government. They argue that immigrants are drawn more towards social and political resources rather than natural resources. The argument explains that social and political stability is more important than natural resources. Pevnick and Cafaro say that social and political resources cannot be equally owned by all people because they are the accomplishments of certain individual people. Pevnick and Cafaro do agree that there’s a moral case for collective ownership of natural resources, but not of social and political

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “BORDERLINE INSANITY” Kurt Eichenwald argues that illegal immigrants should be kept in the United States. Eichenwald gives the viewpoint that the information given out by politicians is faulty. The author contends that although there are many immigrants living in the states illegally, they are not doing the country much harm being here. According to Eichenwald, “When all the statistic and studies are examined, it is easy to see how deceptive or ignorant politicians have been when discussing illegal immigrants.” (32) Eichenwald notes that immigrants, in more than one occasion, might be doing what the people see, but they are doing so much more good on the underside of things for our country.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main point made in the reading passage is that sharing the ownership of lands, which is called commons, made more benefits for everyone in the colonies of New England. However, the professor argues that commons did not work well in reality.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary thesis of this article is that the common ownership formula would create higher equality amongst individuals. The author, Timothy Hinton, advocates that there should not be individuals in a community who are not provided for. He believes that every person is an equal co-owner of the Earth, and should reap its benefits equally. Therefore, if someone in a community cannot provide for themselves, then it is the rest of the community’s responsibility to care for that person. This is important within the field of philosophy in regards to moral and ethical obligations of members in a society. It is also important because this ideology could alter societal structure as we know it.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    JFK ques/answers

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. The argument in paragraph 6 acts as a syllogism because the paragraph is divided into three basic ideas:…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite tensions between the Anglo-Saxons, who “the nation must chiefly depend”(Doc.G), and the immigrants, many Americans, such as James Bryce, felt that immigrants were beneficial to American society. Bryce argued that some immigrants usually did not stay to “pollute” American society and that they also provided cheap labor which would aid the economy (Doc.B). This argument, although logical, did not convince the…

    • 519 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    allocation of property is the key to stability in any society. If the resolution by the…

    • 461 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Immigration Debate We Need” was written by George Borjas, a professor at Harvard, reporter, and economist of The New York Times. Borjas claimed that Trump’s immigration policy is more beneficial than what people make it to be. In the article, he said, “I am [the] living proof that immigration policy can benefit some people.” that supports the idea that the policy is not bad, but useful in society. In the article, he targeted people who are against the immigration policy because he wanted to spread the awareness that Trump’s policy is beneficial. While I was reading this article, I was starting to agree with his viewpoint because he said, “The climate suggests that many Americans view that number as too high”, that means the policy can…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author was way too ambiguous on the information that he gives. For example, when he talks about refugees, he states that they cannot claim that their human rights are being violated when they are denied admission. What is the solution for refugees that have no way out? He did not give a proper solution for immigrants whose human rights are definitely under attack. The article is lacking severely in examples. David Miller uses too many hypotheticals and does not use enough real situations that have actually occurred. The author also should have added statistics and harder evidence. For example. when he states that the Gurkhas are unhappy and are living in measley conditions barely getting enough reparations to get by.That is an example of misleading vividness. For all we know that could just be a handful of people. He did not add enough statistics to back that up. Another topic he could have added statistics to, is how many economic immigrants are accepted and rejected. I believe it would have make his claim stronger. The author’s premises are also lacking in strength, which make his main points weak. An example of this would be when he talks about particularity claimants, he states that immigration is not the best decision for immigrants this makes the author sound not credible. Lastly, his arguments are very easy to counter argue and simple to shut down. The…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This semester, we have read a myriad of pieces of writing that mingled the argument of immigrants. In the selective, “Do Immigrants Actually Hurt the U.S. Economy?” the author, Adam Davidson, explains how immigrants help the economy of the united States to grow and how it is a disadvantage for the wealth and resources of a country. The author describes the certain point that can make the economy strong with immigrants by saying they lowered the general cost of construction, make greater in size the number of a paid position the company could book, which means by increasing more customers and more money. On the other hand, the writer said immigrants use some of the free services the government promotes and provoke a lot of crimes. Immigrants…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Therefore, immigrants’ motives can be questioned regarding which point of view is…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I strongly believe that preparation and prior planning are the basics and foundation of good decisions and success. Without preparation there would be no success. In sports, teams practice 5-6 times a week before there next game making sure they are in the best shape they can possibly be. Running their routes over and over again creating muscle memory, and fluidity. Prior planning is also very important. Without proper prior planning, there would be no success. We have a saying in the United States Marine Corps; Prior proper planning prevents piss poor performance. Also known as the 6’s. To give a few examples of prior planning would be; thinking up a gear list for your junior marines for an up and coming field…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As someone who isn’t very interested in economics, I appreciated that Dr. Morales mentioned what he called a “non-economic stance” where he focused on things that immigrants are bringing to the US that can’t be quantified. He mostly highlighted culture as a huge contribution. There is no question that immigration is adding culture and diversity to the US. As a young college student I can see how artists and public figures are more open about ideas and they help influence change. In today’s society we…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Overall, the opposition towards immigrants is a major international issue because of those factors: political loyalty, religion, disease, and racism. If it is not resolved, without immigration, the economy’s growth decrease. Since immigrants, with or without a degree, bring an additional 262 jobs available for unemployed citizens of that community. For instance, the increase in the businesses in that community. With immigration, it brings more people. With more people, it brings more demand in life essential supplies. These necessaries include things such as food, clothing, appliances, shelter, and transportation. Since originally the residents had businesses that only sustained their country's current population. The residents would then…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, the stance on immigration is always a highly disputed topic. Some believe immigration is the American way, and that all immigrants should be welcome into the country, while others say that immigrants are a threat to national security, and a burden on the economy and the taxpayer. An argument for immigration can be seen in the quote above, specifically that this nation is built upon the achievements of immigrants that traveled to this country hundreds of years ago. Many people disagree on letting illegal immigrants stay at all, mainly because of the fact that they are here illegally…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Illegal Immigration Impact

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In this research paper I will prove that illegal and legal immigrants are not burdens on the U.S. economy. I will prove this by providing facts on the positive impact to the United States educational system, the job industry, and public assistant programs. Immigrants pay taxes, shop, and buy real estate all of these are positive impacts to the economy.…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays