Preview

Summary Of Steven H. Miles's 'Oath Betrayed'

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Steven H. Miles's 'Oath Betrayed'
According to the author of “Oath Betrayed,” Steven H. Miles, a total of 130 different countries are employing their health professionals to carry out torture in interrogation practices. Clearly, this directly conflicts with the normative perspective of doctors in the presence of war, whom are the expected individuals to idolize human rights and follow an ethical and professional path of helping all human beings, enemy or not. We all know that doctors are the foundation to the very health and well-being of society in accordance with their ethics. However, this is not an ubiquitous notion that applies broadly over all contexts; we evidently see that doctors actively participate in the torturing of prisoners of war. Without the presence of a moralistic figure, the only shred of reason and sense of humanity are lost in times of war. Evidently, it can be seen that a doctor’s unchecked responsibilities and powers can lead to a deadly power to be exploited for the wrong reasons. Given the fact that doctors are essentially both a physically and morally necessity, …show more content…
For example, the harsh interrogation techniques of utilized on the terrorists after 9/11 during the Bush administration did not thwart any specific imminent attacks. The captive, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed himself said: “the false information I was forced to invent in order to make the ill-treatment stop wasted a lot of their time and led to several false red-alerts being placed in the U.S.” And thus, according to 30-year veteran of CIA’s operations directorate, this ineffective method of acquiring information has not led to the prevention of any major terrorist operation in the past information. All in all, it is inevitably clear that the absence of moralistic doctors, along with the fact that torturing is not effective in the first place, leads to a counterproductive and subhuman nature of several

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Association for the Prevention of Torture. “Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. New York: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2011. 836-851. Print.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we seem doubtful of the assumption that one is morally upright simply because he or she has a career in medicine, we are struck with a seemingly viable counterargument: all doctors must take the Hippocratic Oath in which they “solemnly” swear to “uphold a number of professional ethical standards” (www.nlm.nih.gov). If we still remain unconvinced as to the universal rectitude of all clinicians, we are belittled and then told that doctors do have our best intentions in mind, as they spent years and countless amounts of money thoroughly studying every aspect of the human body. For why would anyone spend 12 years and half a million dollars for any other reason than to carefully heal and nurture the body of his fellow man? Most of the time, our reliance on “authority heuristics” is rewarded as it is noted that the “majority of physicians” take the words of Hippocrates to heart and refrain from “abus[ing] their patients” (Pesta 4).…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHIL Case Study 1

    • 1463 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Health care, as the name implies, concerns the health and well being of individuals. Although physical aspects of health are particularly important in assessing a person’s well being, there are many other factors that determine whether a person is truly well, with factors such as happiness and psychological wellness playing an equally important role. As doctors attempt to maximize the well being of their patients, they must also keep into consideration their responsibilities and duties towards the general good. In cases such as Scott Starson’s, these varying allegiances can clash, with the apparent well being of a patient potentially bringing harm onto bystanders within society. To better understand the mechanics in these situations, one has to understand the many biomedical ethical concepts and particularities that concern both the patient and the doctor.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The readings for this week consisted of the second half of the book “White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine” by Carl Elliott. These chapters discuss medicalization and bioethics. With the technological advancement that we have seen in a mere decade, these topics become increasingly relevant to our society. One of the recurring themes within Elliott’s writing is the idea that doctors and medicine know best.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Idiocy takes place everywhere in today's society. As idiocy takes control of some people others are there to stop it those people that help stop if are called policeman, Doctors also step out of there comfort zone in order to save their patients. “The Use of Force” by William Carlos William , examines when it is justifiable for doctors to use force against his patients in order to protect them from his/her own ‘Idiocy”, but in today's society the use of force has changed dramatically.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparison of Editorials

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Lewis, J. (2007, January 6). The moral line in medicine shifts once again. The Independent, p. 37. (ProQuest Document ID 311096455).…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Truth About Torture, Charles Krauthammer writes, “Torture is not always impermissible. However rare the cases, there are circumstances in which, by any rational moral calculus, torture not only would be permissible but would be required (to acquire life-saving information).” (309) Krauthammer discusses two scenarios where he believes torture should be permitted: “the ticking time bomb and the slower-fuse high level- terrorist”. (313) The ticking time bomb is a situation where hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent lives are at stake, with little to no time, all dependent on a crucial piece of information that can help mitigate the situation. The slower-fuse high level terrorist is when a person who is second-in-command of a terrorist cell is captured and has vital information that can bring down an entire enemy’s organization with one swift blow. In both of these scenarios, Krauthammer displays one common…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is the intentional pain that an individual experiences justified by the possibility of preserving the lives of many? Torture is the used as a weapon, but in reality does it work? The purpose of this essay is to identify what the motives are for using torture, the effectiveness of torture, and important issues or flaws with the entire process of torture.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are put under a time crunch that affects how we deal with situations. Michael Levin wrote in his essay “The Case for Torture” that we should use torture because it is better to torture one person who is obviously guilty. This would help insure that thousands of lives could be saved at the expense of just one or a few people. In a brief statement about terrorist’s rights, Levin says “torture is barbaric? Mass murder is more barbaric” (532). In this simple statement, Levin argues that torturing is the lesser of two evils. And it is true. Would we rather sacrifice many lives for one that is potentially guilty? Most would say no. In fact, if we allow torture to become legal, we might get results that many have not thought of. If torture was made legal, it could potentially intimidate future terrorists into thinking twice about their plans. Still, nothing is for…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Con Torture

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In a post-9/11 world, where it seems that terrorism is rampant and increasing numbers of extremists threaten the safety and wellbeing of American citizens, is it ever justified to bend the rules of legality and morality while fighting the war on terror? Whether or not the use of torture as an interrogation tactic is justified in these circumstances is questionable because of controversy about its legality, morality, and effectiveness; the use of torture would violate several international and domestic laws as well as compromise American morals and beliefs. Despite this controversy, the United States has employed these tactics in recent years to questionable effect; however, the use of it is illegal, immoral and ineffective. Torture should not be used in any circumstance because it violates American morals, political treaties, and laws, would diminish the reputation of the United States in the world, has not been proven effective by scientific evidence, and would create a future of uncertainty regarding the use of torture.…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Claiming that “[i]t would be a gross dereliction of duty for any government not to keep Khalid Sheikh Mohammed isolated, disoriented, alone, despairing, . . . in order to find out what he knew about plans for future mass murder” (6). In concluding this thought, Krauthammer argues that the only time aggressive forms of interrogation techniques such as torture should be allowed are in the case of Mohammed and the al Qaeda, or in similar situations that include a terrorist who may hold vitally valuable information.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Much help for Torture interrogation of psychological oppressors has risen in the general population gathering, to a great extent in view of the "ticking bomb" situation. I draw from the verifiable record, criminology, authoritative hypothesis, social brain research, and meetings with military experts to visualize an official program of Torture interrogation. The quintessential component of program configuration is a sound causal model relating contribution to yield. Since the September 2001 psychological militant assaults on the United States, much help for Torture interrogation of fear based oppressors has raised in general society discussion, to a great extent in view of the "ticking bomb" situation. National surveys…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussions of ticking time bombs, one controversial issue has been how to deal with the alleged guilty terrorist once he is captured. On the one hand, some people, including Michael Levin, a libertarian writer and educator, argue that it is in the US government’s right to torture the guilty terrorist because his knowledge could be used to save the lives of millions. On the other hand, others, such as Philip Heymann, who is a writer that had worked in the government field, firmly states that torture should never be used because the chance that it will produce true and useful information is nearly impossible and it is vastly more crucial to preserve the international bans on torture. Shirley Jackson elaborates on Heymann’s view when she…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torturing Prisons

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Torturing Prisoners in the War on Terror Is Never Justified."At Issue: How Should the United States Treat Prisoners in the War on Terror?. Lauri S. Friedman. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays