Preview

Summary Of Stooping To Make Fun Of Themselves By Elizabeth Kolbert

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
880 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Stooping To Make Fun Of Themselves By Elizabeth Kolbert
It has recently come to my attention via “Business Insider,” that a rather unpleasant problem has arisen. Upon further investigation into your comments suggesting that “money is more important for men” (Wylar), there is a high risk of this event affecting your reelection. Since voters will likely not support one who attacks the Wisconsin Equal Wage law, . An essay, Stooping to Conquer: Why Candidates Need to Make Fun of Themselves, written by Elizabeth Kolbert, has been brought to my attention, and might be of some aid in this predicament. Within, Kolbert discusses how humor may be used politically to escape difficult situations. Based upon your circumstances, the best courses of action to initiate would be that of self-parody by becoming …show more content…
Strategies such as this allow the people to see a politician from a different angle than they normally would be exposed to. This side seems to be a more human, relatable side of the politician. According to Kolbert, “the most devastating joke is circulated not by an irreverent observer or a sly opponent but by the target himself” Parodies might be self-exposed, or credit given to an outside source, usually a late-night talk show. While a politician may easily lose control of what the media says about him or her, resulting in unfavorable shadows of themselves, self-induced parody is the opposite. Taking the initiative of restoring one’s personal, human image allows the ability to laugh off any downfalls. Relenting and taking control in moderation, opens the door for the politician to regain their public …show more content…
Politically smart people watch shows attuned to a higher understanding of politics and the involved players. The average person does not watch shows such as “Meet the Press” or “Face the Nation”. A higher percentage are instead undereducated, unsure or lacking in opinion when it comes to submitting their vote. As such, programs starring Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers and Stephen Colbert are making up the difference in supplying current political information (Kolbert, 71). Political comedy programs discuss current events, encouraging politicians to make appearances to discuss their recent decisions, actions or mistakes. Commonly, politicians appear during campaigns, following events effecting their reputation, or to affect their reputations. Jon Macks, a previous writer for Jay Leno, once said that “there’s a lot of people that watch the ‘Tonight Show,’ or any of the shows like it, who are going to see someone and they are going to connect” (Kolbert, 72). Utilizing these publicized moments is a chance to form connections with the people, showing themselves in a different light. Proving politicians are people, able to relate to the problems people are going through in their daily lives. All people can embarrass themselves. Each can utter a wrong word, offend the wrong person. The only difference being politicians have theirs directly affecting their occupations.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When O’Brien was being detained by the secret service for an article he wrote entitled “How to Fight Presidents”. He pondered on the implications of satire and how they also related to being a comedian. To ponder a statement like this O’Brien decided that it was best to use pathos to rhetorically appeal to an emotion in order to connect his words together. Logically, he knew that because he was talking to a secret service member the seemingly egotistical statement did not make it out of his mouth. Rather thought this statement as result of the joy he felt at the moment where he thought he might have got away easy. “Ah, the life of a joke smith, I mused internally, the burden and joy of making the world a more magical place, one laugh at a time.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Daily Show is a source of controversy when its affect on democracy is analyzed. Some critics, like Roderick P. Hart and E. Johanna Hartelius who wrote “The Political Sins of Jon Stewart”, believe that Jon Stewart and his use of cynicism are harmful to Democracy. Conversely, Robert Harriman who wrote “In Defense of Jon Stewart” concedes that Jon Stewart is a cynic “for [the purpose] of coming to the key point of judgment” (274) although he considers Jon Stewart a helpful defender of democracy rather than a harmful offender. Similarly, Lisa Colletta the author of “Political Satire and Postmodern Irony in the Age of Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart” feels that satire, rather than cynicism, which she believes is the form of rhetoric that Jon Stewart uses, is beneficial to democracy. In all, through an analysis of Roderick P. Hart and E. Johanna Hartelius’ “The Political Sins of Jon Stewart”, Robert Harriman’s “In Defense of Jon Stewart”, and Lisa Colletta’s “Political Satire and Postmodern Irony in the Age of Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart” I feel that Jon Stewart’s use of satire on The Daily Show is constructive for democracy.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Alain de Botton’s 2004 book, Status Anxiety, he claimed that the chief aim of humorists is not to just entertain, but also to “convey impunity messages that might be dangerous or impossible to state directly.” This statement is true because comedians, cartoonists, and other humarists can change the world with messages that they portray through their works. By using their different techniques, humorists can effectively get a message out to the public that would typically get a person in trouble. Such an example of this would be political cartoonists who, through their works, can show representations of political corruption throughout the government without being target by the mentioned politicians. Political cartoonists have always delivered their messages to the public despite the dangers they may face for it, such as the political cartoonists…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The comedy showcases pushed the boundaries by making fun of political figures many people were scared to do so. One writer stated, “Further, few people had sought to ridicule public figures because most were fearful of being offensive (Stebbins, 1990)” ( Dean 15). By pushing the boundaries, SNL captures the audiences. Young adults are now watching the show, and scholars believe that political entertainment shows like SNL have a positive side to them. Dean argues that SNL makes young adults participate in campaign events and join an organization. The author states, “Cao and Brewer (2008) found that those who regularly watch political comedy shows are more likely to attend a campaign event or join an organization” (17). Many scholars believed that political entertainment shows have an impact on young adults. Also, some scholars believe that these political entertainment shows have a negative side. The author states that one negative side is, “Further, many scholars argue that political comedy shows exploit stories to provide entertainment and that their political information is often lacking in substance (Baum, 2003;Kim & Vishak, 2008; Prior)” (17). This can be seen in a professors’ study on SNL and how the show impacted the way young adults felt about Governor Sarah…

    • 3658 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 2016 presidential election has forced the United States in an extremely divided position, which can be seen in the vandalizing of many political yard signs in suburban neighborhoods. The root of this schism lies in the polarizing candidates; Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are doing everything they can to repair their faulty past, whether it be controversial misogynistic statements or a frightening email deletion. However, their actions seem to be alienating people even more, and whether or not they prove to be effective in the long run remains to be seen. Nevertheless, these self-preserving behaviors can be paralleled with several characters such as Jessep and Dr. Stone found in Aaron Sorkin’s A Few Good Men, and especially Jocasta…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The beginning of a speech or presentation should capture the attention of the audience and reel them in. Most of the opening segments for talk shows or late-night television programs that I have ever watched have started out with a satire of a recent news event or with a joke that captured the audience’s attention through humor. Recent political news has been the subject of satire used to open Saturday Night Live or been the subject of a joke on The Tonight Show. While all American’s might not agree with the comments in the openings, it does capture the attention of an audience.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    According to King and Peterson, both lecturers at Kennedy school, congressional gridlock may occur as the result of the political impact of an ordinary citizen due to the exposure to media which influences them in a way that citizens only want to listen to what pleases them and avoid listening to what makes them uncomfortable. How they are involved in politics at both local and national level (Lorch & Steinman, 2013)…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Satire Of Mockery

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page

    The first technique of satire used in mockery. Mockery is making fun of a particular thing. Mockery is used in the quote, “What has happened to our conviction? Where are the limbs out on which we once walked? Have they been, like, chopped down with the rest of the rain forest? Or do we have, like, nothing to say? Has society become so, like, totally . . . I mean absolutely . . . You know?” The author is trying to make fun of the current generation by saying that they're conviction was cut down with the trees and the rainforest. This is mockery because the current generation is a major supporter of stopping the killing of the rainforest. It also shows, again, how they use like and whatever every other word.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alan De Botton Humorists

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alan de Botton’s views on the vital role of humorists in conveying unpopular or difficult to say perspectives is mostly incorrect. While it is undeniable that humorists are allowed to say some things other people normally can’t, the role of humorists in society is not vital because of these messages, nor is this immunity all-powerful in protecting these humorists from backlash. The vital function of humorists in society is not to be some sort of activist (society has enough of those already), but rather to be funny—to pursue their chief aim of entertainment, and to make people laugh.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Donald Trump's Rhetoric

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The tensions and distrust of Republican officials by the disenfranchised party members has provided the backdrop to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. In the current presidential election Republican candidate Donald Trump has been covered more extensively than any other candidate. Much of Donald Trump’s rhetoric are centered around shock value statements that make perfect controversial sound bites that are then repeatedly played on news channels, television shows, and posted online. According to an estimate by the New York Times the air time Donald Trump has received is worth over two billion dollars. Regardless of the fact that much of the coverage Trump has received the main value of all of that television coverage has been name recognition.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Often time, prolonged time and importance was given to publically well-known figures like Donald Trump being wealthy real estate business man, Ben Carson-a retired neuro surgeon and Jeb Bush-an elite from political family back ground. No cameras turned around to candidates like Governor Chris Christie. Moderators did not give much importance to ask questions to him unless he interrupts others in the middle while they are making their points, and tries to justify him as a better candidate than others. The statement Chris made regarding fancies football interrupting Jeb Bush while Bush was talking to answer Quintanilla’s question was weighty enough to led debate towards matters of public and government concerns. He alerted moderators not to deviate away from the topics of public and nation’s concern. He stated “let’s not talk about fancies, talk about how we can make better America by clearing debt, producing more jobs and securing America from terrorist like AL Quade and ISIS”-this statement was able to draw emotion of audiences, viewers and public.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schroeder, A. (2000). Presidential debates: Forty years of high-risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Daily Show with Jon Stewart provides a particularly example of political culture jamming. The Daily Show jams the uninterrupted stream of the dominant political images through the proliferation of humorous dissident images, images that exploit leverage points—factual errors, logical contradictions, and incongruities—in both the dominant political discourse and the media that disseminate it. Creating their own version of Adbusters’ subvertisements through the news parody, coupled with the information specific tactics of the strategic use of video and Stewart’s Socratic interview style, Stewart and his colleagues add their subversive interpretation of the dominant political brand to the public sphere. Politicians now use all the available…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humor In Argument Essays

    • 637 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Often times argumentative essays can be hard to read because a lot of the time they are stuffed with so much information, which is why adding humor helps keep the reader engaged and wanting to read more. Throughout Steven Colbert’s “Higher Education,” I found myself consistently laughing, making me want to continue to read to see what he says next. On the other hand, during Robert Applebaum’s “Cancel Student Loan Debt,” I found myself losing interest and almost dreading what was to come in the next paragraphs. Humor is a key component in arguments on topics that aren’t too interesting by themselves, such as Steven Colbert’s essay.…

    • 637 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Popular Satire

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Most people under the age of twenty-five get their news from shows like mine,” Stephen Colbert stated on his former late night show The Colbert Report. His program, along with other popular Comedy Central news shows such as The Daily Show and The Nightly Show provide factual national and international current events, with entertaining satirical commentary. In Alain de Botton’s book, Status Anxiety, he claims that humorists are vital to society because they say things that others cannot and will not say. Humorists are important in any society because they are given the duty of speaking up through challenging authority, making people think, and voicing their opinions.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays