THE CONFLICT
THEORY
KARL MARX’S
VIEW ON CRIME
WHAT IS CRIME ?
An action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law.
A crime is an act that breaks a law that relates to how to behave in society. The harm caused by the act is seen to be against society as a whole, not just a specific person.
Marxist views on deviance adopt a conflict-structuralist stance.
The economic base or infrastructure determines the precise nature of superstructure, i.e. the way the economy is organized will determine the norms, values and what is defined deviant.
According to Marxists capitalism is based on oppression and economic exploitation of the majority.
It creates a dog eat dog world in which greed, violence and corruption flourish
Marxists states that crime happen as a result of inequality and poverty
MARXIST VIEW ON
CRIME
Marxist sees crime and deviance as not coming from moral or hereditary defects but defects within society. They see crime as an inevitable part of capitalism which stems from social inequalities within a society. Working-class crime is caused by labor exploitation and material misery.
MARXIST’S VIEW ON
CRIME (CONT’D)
Marxist’s criminology blames mainly the competitive nature of the capitalist system for crime.
This view basically says that the poor commit crime due to anger, frustration and need while the wealthy engage in illegal activity to maintain their position in society, and that the wealthy are used to this competition as it is a must in order to maintain their social stance. MARXIST’S VIEW ON
CRIME (CONT’D)
Therefore theft is an expression of exploitation and is a political act of the proletariat against the bourgeoisie.
Marxists say that the ruling class will violate laws and go unpunished while members of the subject class will be punished
Crime diverts the working-class's attention from the exploitation they experience; it contains their resistance
MARXIST’S VIEW ON
CRIME (CONT’D)
They say crime is a reaction to the life condition’s of a person’s social class.
It changes from society to society depending on the political and economic make up of that society.
Crime will continue in capitalist societies because they condone and encourage inequality and class conflict and penal law will expand in relation to that inequality and exploitation
CONFLICT THEORY
The conflict theory claims that crime is a result of class conflict because the laws are created by those in power to protect their rights and interests only.
It states that all crime in a society has a political undertone. This concept was coined by Richard
Quinney; ‘the social reality of crime.’ The theory was built on the foundation of the idea that the justice system is biased on its design to protect the wealthy SUMMARY
•
•
•
Crime is cause by the external force of capitalism. The social inequalities caused by the economic base (capitalism) determines activity within the superstructure(crimes agents of social control)
Social- class exploitation by the bourgeoisie over the proletariat causes crime
Prepared by:
Aneal King
Jade Chow
Kayla Richards c
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Three social issues that are in this case are that one, social issue in this case was Ford claimed the reason for the recall of the 1.9 million Ford Pintos was not for safety but for “reputational” reasons. This is a social issue because, after all the evidence was piled up on their company for being unsafe and hazardous, they couldn’t just admit they made a mistake and recall the vehicles to make them safer. No, they had to use the reputation card to help their company’s image in the long run so they wouldn’t lose profit. In this issue, there is no utilitarianism because there mindset in making this decision isn’t for the right reasons. There not doing it to intentionally increase the safety of everybody. One version, rule-utilitarianism, considers that, “a rule or code of behavior is morally right if, by its application, the consequences are more favorable that unfavorable to everyone.” They weren’t being moral when they made this decision. The citizens and people had nothing to do with the recall. It was their own self-pity and arrogance. Another social issue in this case is that in June of 1978, Ford knew that its fuel tank did not meet Federal Safety Standards, yet they didn’t do anything to warn the owners of this. It’s a fact that if people were warned of this issue, thousands and thousands of people wouldn’t want to buy the Ford Pinto. Being that this was a social issue, Ford was all about making a profit and hid crucial information for the public. The third of many social issues in this case are that when Ford was being prosecuted in the courtroom, they defended themselves against negligence by claiming its car was comparable to other subcompacts at that time.…
- 918 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Marxism is an example of the conflicting view as they argue that the law and social rules reflect the interests of the rich and powerful groups in society who have managed to impose their ideas and way of thinking on the wider population through coercion and ideological control. Therefore they are able to get their assumptions of crime to stick as opposed to the opinions of an ordinary person on the street.…
- 1744 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Radical Criminology is a conflict that bases its perspectives on crime and law in the belief that capitalist societies define crime as the owners of the means of production use their power to enact laws that will control the working class and repress threats to the power of the ruling class. It is there to make governments aware of various crimes they commit against human rights and national laws. It might view modern society because they believe the police are serving the needs of the elite few at the expense of the majority. Crimes of the low income and working class result from political decisions which result in the choices of political workers. It states that the causes of crime can be found in social conditions that empower the wealthy…
- 435 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Marxist theorists suggest that the workings of society can be explained by the concept of exploitation – the ruling class exploit the working class. This is the fundamental point by which Chambliss pointed to explore the relationship between class and crime. Traditional Marxists imply that the judiciary system is beneficial to the ruling class only. This dominant ideology disseminates through agencies such as, education, media, and religion which is forced onto individuals, this process is known as hegemony.…
- 446 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Marxist sociologists argue that in order to understand crime and deviance, one needs to realise that it is the nature of exploitative economic systems that capitalist societies have in place that is primarily responsible. This is because the bourgeoisie and ruling classes oppress and exploit the working classes, which drives them into poverty. This causes a rift between the “haves” and the “have-nots” as the workers try to end exploitation whilst the owners of the means of production aim to keep the system to maintain profits. Most Marxists agree that crime is the result of poverty created through this system, for example people steal because they are materially deprived which is a result of low wages being paid by the ruling classes. This is a reason Marxists would give for the over-representation of the working classes in official crime statistics.…
- 1221 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Marxist view OCS as a bad measure of crime and deviance, as most laws are enforced to focus on the lower and working class. This means that there is less focus placed on white collar crimes, which are rarely prosecuted and the law does not define the crimes for the ‘rich’ criminals. Crimes such as embezzlement is most likely dealt with out of the public eye, and in house. Marxists argue that the working class is criminalised and that sociologists’ use of these statistics will only serve to maintain ruling class deception. OCS are seen by Marxists as a part of the ideological weaponry of the bourgeoisie. The Marxist view further highlights the negativity of people in higher status created OCS, in order…
- 1364 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Handguns comprised 72.5 percent of the firearms used in murder and non-negligent manslaughter incidents in 2011; 4.1 percent were with shotguns; 3.8 percent were with rifles; 18.5 percent were with unspecified firearms.…
- 371 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Crime occurs when society does not provide its members with equal opportunities in society. The individuals are not given equal opportunity in society will not have the same investment in their community as members of society that are afforded job and educational opportunities. When social functions are not equal the members of society are not recognized by society, he or she will develop their own unique subculture is more accepting of crime (Rock, 2012). This type of subculture appears in lower income and poverty…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One way in which Marxism is a useful theory for explaining the causes of crime is the concept of capitalism, criminogenic capitalism. Criminogenic capitalism is based on the exploitation of the working class- using them for a means to an end. Crime is not confined to the working class, greed and self interest cause white collar crimes such as tax evasion and breaches of the health and safety laws. An example to highlight this can be seen from Gordon 1988 who studied the response to the anti capitalist system and found that it is apparent that it can be found in all social classes. This analysis shows that Marxism is useful to a large extent.…
- 733 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Conflict as defined by Floger, Poole, and Stutman is the interaction of interdependent people who perceive incompatible goals and interference from each other in achieving those goals. The word that was reiterated was interdependent. The author states that there cannot be conflict if you do not have interdependent people because the non-interdependent people will give up and walk away. Conflict does not always end in a negative result; there can be productive and positive resolution from conflict as well.…
- 1385 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The term sociological imagination is said to have originated in 1959, with American sociologist C. Wright Mills. It refers to the number of factors in sociology that influence and shape connections between that which is remote and seemingly indirectly related on a personal level to simplistic aspects of everyday life for an individual. The idea basically implies that personal issues are projected as social problems by people in an attempt to rationalize a linkage to society. However, in employing the sociological imagination it is believed that distinctions are able to be made between the two. Take teenage pregnancy for instance (“Sociological Imagination”). Under the suggestion made by Mills, underage mothers should be able to recognize that they are not the only ones who are dealing with the same problem. This is a large-scale public concern that faces young girls in almost every community across the country. Instead of falling into a pit of guilt, sociological imagination says that they should perhaps blame the school system, their parents, or any of a number of other social forces that led to their personal dilemma. In an article by David Von Drehle published in Time magazine entitled “Finding Their Way Back to Life,” the question that was originally asked by philosophy professor Joseph Pitt is reiterated: Can Blacksburg, Virginia residents ever return to a life of unlocked doors? (p. 44). This comes after the shocking incident that took place on April 16th of 2007 where a young South Korean student opened fire on the Virginia Tech campus, killing thirty-two innocent people in two separate attacks before taking his own life. This horrific event directly affects a vast majority of Blacksburg’s relatively small population not to mention the families of victims that may very well reside in other communities throughout Virginia and even across the country (Von Drehle 44). Indirectly, however, the controversy surrounding gun control has been tossed back onto the…
- 593 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The social conflict theory states that criminal behavior is founded on the conflict with a ruling social class labeling specific behaviors as illegal because of a social or an economic interest in protecting that community’s status quo. This is based on the belief that instead of laws showing the values of an entire society, the laws only exhibit the values of the few in society that hold power, and has no oppositions in using the justice system as a means of ensuring that power is kept. If behaviors, such as these are not corrected later in one’s life with improvements such as jobs and positive relationships, wrongful acts of behavior will continue to exist, possibly leading to future criminal activity…
- 1290 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
This essay will discuss the issues between two people, Robert and Denise Patton, along with how these issues affect their two children. To enable an understanding of the problem a summary of the nature and history of the conflict has been given. In addition, a look at the interaction of interests, goals, and the power of each party allows an understanding of each person’s position and role in the conflict as well as personal attempts at resolution of the problem. In working to resolve this conflict there will be strategies discussed which, if Robert and Denise are willing to apply, could help them resolve the conflicts that they are facing in their marriage.…
- 1336 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
“Conflict theory shows how major patterns of inequality in society produce social stability in some circumstances and social change in orders” (Brym, Roberts, Strohschen, lie 2015:18). I would use conflict theory to explain women running for office in this campaign and why men are more than women in terms of election in different parties. Research and theory associated with studying gender issues propelled the sociology of gender from the margins to become a central feature of the discipline ( Why is it that there are more men involved in elections compare to women? Women have to be given the chance to compete in the election, showing sign of equality amongst men and women which is the fundamental principals of human rights and…
- 554 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Conflict Perspective assumes social behavior is understood in terms of conflict or tension between competing groups over power or the allocation of resources, including housing, money, access to services, and political representation. The tensions between these groups don’t necessarily need to be violent; they can take the form of labor negotiations, party politics, competition between religious groups for new members, or disputes over the federal budget. In this case, the tension is between two different groups, the rich verses the poor.…
- 542 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays