Preview

Summary of "The Death of Common Sense"

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
711 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary of "The Death of Common Sense"
A Review of “The Death of Common Sense” by Philip Howard

Jennifer Loidolt

College of St. Scholastica

A Review of “The Death of Common Sense” by Philip Howard

“The Death of Common Sense” detailed glaring concerns with the governing of our society. Initially Howard discusses the law, and how it controls almost every activity of common interest. After a law is made, it is no longer questioned, even if common sense tells us the law no longer makes sense. He then goes into process and procedure, which have taken over. The end product is no longer the most important part, but the process to get there, and making sure everything is done correctly and fairly for all. Howard also discusses the multitude of new found “rights” that we now have as Americans. These rights now provide people with many things, but at the expense of everyone else. He concludes with concepts that may help get us out of the hole we have dug. There was a time when America worked on general principles that reflected the law’s goals. Our obsession with preordained rules, endless checklists, and redundant processes needs to stop. There can never be complete objectivity. Even though the laws and processes attempt to make everything objective, as humans we instill our values into any decision we make. We should be allowed to make such decisions. The overabundance of process and laws are in place because we assume that all people are bad. We have created a system that should prevent people from taking advantage, but just the opposite has happened. Our process and regulations create the opportunity for “bad” people to still take advantage, and they are more able to cover their tracks. These loopholes exist because it is almost impossible to review all the processes that already exist, and overlap is inevitable. We understand these loopholes occur, and because they are there decisions are delayed as every eventuality is taken into account, no matter how absurd. Howard states that rights



References: Foltz, F. A., Mitcham, E. C. (2005) Social Contract Theory. Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, (pp1796-1800) Detroit: Macmillian Reference USA. Howard, P.K., (1994) The Death of Common Sense. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks Porter, J. (2010) Ministers of the Law: A Natural Law Theory of Legal Authority. Michigan: Wm. B. Erdmans Publishing Co.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Waldron, J. (2013). Separation of Powers in Thought and Practice? Boston College Law Review, 54(2), 433-468.…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine’s Common Sense was written for the loyalists who were one the edge of joining the American rebels and vice-versa.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With open rebellion taking place against Britain, 1776 was a time of political unrest in the American colonies. Yet while their soldiers were openly fighting the British, capturing forts and fortifying cities, few voiced what the colonies true intents were. They were not fighting to negotiate taxes or self-defense, but to proclaim independence. Swaying the colonies to back open rebellion was not an easy task, with a large part of influence for this action coming in thanks to Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense”…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/421 Week 1

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Bushman, M. (2007). The Role and Functions of Law in Business and Society. Retrieved from http://www.associatedcontent.com…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The era of the 1770’s was one of confusion, rebellion, and liberation. The British had stopped its salutary neglect of the American colonies and now taxed them heavily to make up for their losses in the seven years’ war. During this turmoil, an upstarting journalist in Philadelphia by the name of Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet entitled common sense. His simple purpose for this fairly large document was for his fellow man to set aside his or her prejudices and listen to his arguments; mainly that the time for talking has passed and the only thing left to do is raise arms. Paine wields the argumentative appeals, Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in a strong and yet eloquent way that adds immense power to his disputes with Britain.…

    • 854 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bushman, M. (Feb, 2007) The Roles and functions of law in business and Society. Mallor, J.,…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paine begins the pamphlet “Common Sense” with differentiating between government and society. He argues that society is a “blessing”; on the other hand, government is nothing but a “necessary evil.” Society is everything positive that people join together to accomplish. Government, on the other hand, is only there to protect us from our innate evil. Government has its origins in the evil of man and is therefore considered a necessary evil at its best. If all people acted morally, then government will not be necessary. But since we are all sinful humans, government’s role is essential to protect our life, property and provide security.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine Common Sence

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The pamphlet Common Sense by Thomas Paine with its commentary about government and its views of man helped shape the attitude of the colonist in the time of the revolutionary war. Paine begins by making the correlation that individuals have a predisposition to correlate government with the society as a whole. However, argues that society is something we are to strive to attain, in contrast to government which is "a necessary evil." Paine argues that Society encourages the prosperity of our desires, wherein government exists as a means only to keep man from itself and its own actions. Paine opines that a country hampered by an oppressive government, is far worse than if such behavior were to occur on its own. As it’s the people of the country which choose to create and support the government, and are therefore supporting their own poor conditions. Paine argues that should all people act in a moral and justly fashion then government would not be necessary. However, individuals are imperfect and thus, government is necessary for the protection of life and property. Therefore, government’s fundamental purpose is and should be to provide security, and the success of a government is dependent upon how it fulfills this role. Paine clearly defines this sentiment by the following representation:…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Common Sense, Thomas Paine argues for American independence. His argument begins with more general, theoretical reflections about government and religion, then progresses to the specifics of the colonial situation. Paine begins by differentiating between government and society. Society, is everything constructive and good that people join together to accomplish. Government, on the other hand, is an institution whose sole purpose is to protect us from our own corruption. Government has its origins in the evil of man and is therefore a necessary evil at best. Paine says that government's only purpose is to protect life, liberty and property, and that a government should be judged just on the basis of the extent to which it accomplishes this goal. Paine then considers an imagined scenario in which a small group of people has been placed on an island, and cut off from the rest of society. In time, these people develop ties with one another, and lawmaking becomes inevitable. Paine says the people will be much happier if they are responsible for the creation of the laws that rule them. Paine argues that such a system of representation is also better for the American colonists. Having expressed his disagreement with British reign in America, Paine continues to launch a general attack on the British system of government. Paine says the British system is too complex and abundant with contradictions, and that the monarchy is granted far too much power. The British system pretends to offer a reasonable system of checks and balances, but contrarily, it does not.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paines Common Sense

    • 1029 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “In the following pages I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense..”-- words that left a mark of the US and was a point of no return in the struggle for independence from Europe. Thomas Paine, the author of a once anonymous pamphlet published in January of 1776, is singled out as America’s true logical creator. Using clever methods to grasp his audience, Paine successfully dug deep into the minds and hearts of those who feared what leaving the rule of the King, or even a subtle attempt would bring. Common Sense confronted the power of the British government and the noble kingdom. The simple language that Paine used called out to the American public and was the first written work to openly request independence from Great Britain. In his eyes, a monarchy was not the voice of the people nor was it a step towards “real independence”—in less than a years’ time, many would have the same perception.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    progressive reformers

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cited: Talmadge, P. A. (n.d.). Understanding the limits of power Judicial restraint in general jurisdiction court systems.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rowe vs Wade

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    "The Court today is correct in holding that the right asserted by Jane Roe is embraced within the personal liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It is evident that the Texas abortion statute infringes that right directly. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine a more complete abridgment of a constitutional freedom than that worked by the inflexible criminal statute now in force in Texas. The question then becomes whether the state interests advanced to justify this abridgment can survive the 'particularly careful scrutiny ' that the Fourteenth Amendment here requires. The asserted state interests are protection of the health and safety of the pregnant woman, and protection of the potential future human life within her. But such legislation is not before us, and I think the Court today has thoroughly demonstrated that these state interests cannot constitutionally support the broad abridgment of personal liberty worked by the existing Texas law. Accordingly, I join the Court 's opinion holding that that law is invalid under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment" (Craig and O 'Brien 17).…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contractualism

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plato.stanford.edu (2007) Contractualism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractualism/ [Accessed: 14 Mar 2012].…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Value of Common Sense

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Common sense, a mere adaptation on one's way of thinking and acting. It is described as the knowledge and judgment that most people already have or should have. Many people generalise certain acts as an inconsideration for common sense. In my short period of existence, I can certainly say that the practice of this concept can only be perceived as anything but common, more like rare or occasional.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays