Preview

Summary Of The Film 'Hydraulic Fracking'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Film 'Hydraulic Fracking'
The central argument of the film is that there is a risk caused by contaminated drinking water from ground water sources which tends to be a result of hydraulic fracking. All water is connected so if an individual or company pollutes an area where the water is, the water will inevitably become polluted over time as well.
This argument is effective mostly due to the fact that the film showed that the government and large cooperations were getting away with being responsible for causing health concerns for both humans and animals. Additionally, this documentary used the stories of real people that were living through terrible situations. What gave the fracking industry the upper hand is that oil and gas industries were exempt from abiding by
…show more content…
When it comes to hydraulic fracking, of all the water that is pumped into the ground only about half of it comes back up so there is a lot of water that has the ability to get into the water table causing contamination. Companies cannot monitor water conditions until they know what to monitor. Residents of Dimock complained of issues with their water but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said their water was just fine and safe for consumption. The residents never had a problem with their water but once drilling started taking place in their area then they started having problems with their water. It is not just a few people in the area having an issue with their water, it is everyone having the same problem of not having drinkable water. Some people were even able to light their water on fire which should not be able to be done. In one instance, a gentleman turned on a sink in his garage and light a lighter next to the water and it ignited fairly quickly and it produced a large flame. Even news stations broadcasted on air that people in the community had unsafe groundwater and that it was tested and said to have been contaminated due to natural gas. People repeatedly …show more content…
In particular, even though I appreciate that real people and events were used in this film, not all of the sources were credible especially one family in particular. One family did not want to talk to the media about their water being able to be lit on fire and when Josh Fox wanted to interview them they let him in but would not let him tape their faces and did not share much information with him initially. They later called him back and said money is not worth it and that their health is more important so he was given a sample of their water in a jar to find out what was in the water. Another instance that seemed odd was when Josh Fox was asked by an individual he was interviewing if he had a message he was trying to get across with his film and he did not give an answer to the gentleman he just said “um.” Actual government representation was not present in the documentary to point out what they may or may not be doing wrong with the issue of hydraulic fracking. It was only a few people who work for higher up government companies that were brave enough and know what they are doing as a company is wrong and they cannot stand for it any

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Methane can likewise prompt ground water bringing about a genuine danger to individuals' wellbeing, something that must be more controlled and checked upon. As indicated by Dictionary.com, a narrative is a motion picture, or a TV or radio program that gives a verifiable record or report, comprising official pieces and sources. There are constantly two sides to a story and afterward there is a truth. "Gasland" is a narrative film by Josh Fox specifically exploring into the residential common gas industry and its overwhelming effects on the earth and human wellbeing. Then again, "Fracknation" is a narrative film that assaults claims by the counter fracking film "Gasland" whose movie producers pulled in national regard for water quality worries by setting faucet water ablaze. Rather, they go more top to bottom attempting to get the genuine accurate answers of the circumstances and end results hydraulic fracking prompts. A narrative is a film that must be demonstrated accurate, be that as it may, as indicated by "Fracknation": a great deal of the data observed in "Gasland" is turned out to be false…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They are concerned that millions of gallons of contaminated wastewater are produced from fracking methods and that there are currently no facilities operating to remove these pollutants. When separated by a mile or more from groundwater sources and the earth’s surface, the ancient marine waters along with naturally existing toxic compounds are not an issue, but “Fracking disturbs, distributes, and carries upward with the fracked gas ‘produced waters’ containing radioactive materials, heavy metals, hydrocarbons such as BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and toluene [sic.]), bromide, highly concentrated salts, and many other organic and inorganic compounds that, when exposed to our environment, are dangerous health hazards—many are known as carcinogens and toxic to biological life” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). Which brings up the question of why can’t they use less toxic chemicals in the fracking process? Tracy Carluccio, the Deputy Director of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, continues by stating, “even if companies were to switch to ‘green’, ‘non-toxic’ fracking fluids, drilling and fracking in these deep formations will always deliver potentially deadly chemical hazards, even in a perfectly regulated world” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). The cement and steel casings used in combination with the methods for sealing post-production gas wells do not confine the methane along with other dangerous gases and contaminated fluids that are pressurized within the aquifer.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gasland Josh Fox Analysis

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once he finds out that fracking (hydraulic fracturing) has been taking place in 35 states he begins his trip. Almost all the people he interviews feel that fracking is contaminating drinking water sources. The people interviewed also had to say that the public health and safety is least of the concern for these natural gas companies. The film shows that it has affected people through out United States. Many of those who lived close to extraction sites had shown symptoms of diseases or poisonings for example loss of hair, headaches and muscle aches. There were some severe cases like cancer, neuralgia and permanent brain damage. The loopholes created by politicians like Dick Cheney to exempt fracking from certain emission standards including Safe Drinking Water act and the corporate greed has been blamed for all the problems that is considered to be associated with…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    well that is no longer producing. Next we discuss the rise of fracking. We present here a history…

    • 3245 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘ Spills, accidents, improper disposal and poor well construction can lead the toxic chemicals in fracking fluid entering drinking water; more than 1,000 cases of water contamination near drilling sites were documented nationally’ according to the Food and Water Watch group. This adverse pollution of groundwater cannot be reversed and it may be difficult to detect and address all the problem sources because Fracking Companies do not need to disclose what is used in the process. Fracking can also lead to droughts as water is sometimes extracted from already water-deprived communities. Only a tiny percent of water is regained and stored in pits, and still ends up being hazardous to living things around them. There were many reports of illnesses in livestock that were exposed to these waste water pits, and according to the results of an experimental study every tree exposed to fracking…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gasland Film Analysis

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people couldn’t wash their clothes or even drink water I felt really sad people be living in these poor conditions people should get together to stop this because all this can ruin the environment. As they were showing in the documentary people had drank the water and gotten sick which they had gone to the hospital because there are some serious sickness.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaslands Part II

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Obviously, polluting groundwater that people use to drink breaks many environmental rules set by the government and the Environmental Protection Agency. The people of Dimock and other areas (Pavillion, Wyoming, parts of Arkansas, and multiple places across Texas were the spots highlighted in the movie) had water that was not only undrinkable because of such high toxin content, but could be lit on fire because of the extreme amounts of gas in it. When the EPA was brought in to evaluate however, they declared the water “clean”, even though they had results that were released afterwards that obviously said the water was extremely dangerous to drink. The operation was just too profitable to make the oil companies stop. The control over the EPA was a…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pennsylvania Act 13 of 2012 is an act that imposed stronger environmental standards and authorized local governments to adopt impact fees, and build upon the state’s efforts to move towards energy independence as unconventional gas development (hydraulic fracturing) continues. Some of the act’s provisions include increased setback requirements for hydraulic fracturing; enhancing the protection of water supplies; and strong, uniform, and consistent statewide environmental standards.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking in North Texas

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fracking requires up to 5 million gallons of water per well and perhaps even more in which case, the tons of water used would create a huge demand of local water supplies (Dong). Unlike agriculture or domestic water uses, gas drilling does not return the used water back into in the ground (Myers). The water can not go back into the ground because the returned water not only has added chemicals that helped with fracturing but also has about 40,000 gallons of chemicals that were previously added (Dong). Sometimes, the used water can leak out in surrounding lakes and rivers. Those lakes and rivers supply the surrounding communities with water but now since fracking, the water is polluted. The chemicals that are in the water can cause serious illnesses and possibly be life threatening since most chemicals are poisonous.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern environmental justice movement began in the mid- 20th century, when the country realized that the environment needed help. This movement throughout the last several decades has evolved from protecting woodland areas from deforestation to protection against the gas industry. Hydraulic fracturing is the process by which natural gas is extracted from the earth’s shales. The process begins with drilling through several layers of the earth, like the freshwater aquifer. Next, water with “fracking fluid” is injected into the drilled area to crack the shale. This water comes back up to the surface and is put into a pit to evaporate. The natural gas flows up, and is then stored. The process is simple enough, but so are the consequences. Hydraulic fracturing has detrimental environmental consequences and should be banned.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One good effect that fracking has had and Gold noted, is that fracking has significantly improved our economy by creating more jobs for people. For many years our economy had suffered with plummeting unemployment rates, but about 10 years ago when fracking came about it was like a savior had come because fracking provided more jobs and in turn lowered the unemployment rate. In some ways fracking is a better alternative for the environment. Burning coal is very hazardous to the environment because of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. Fracking does not produce CO2 emissions because it is natural gas that is being produced and thus it is technically cleaner…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While fracking accidents are mostly harming the animals, fracking also pollutes the water, consequently people are noticing a huge change in water quality. Fracking contaminates the water in a very obvious way. Fracking could had been done only using water and clean sand. However to make the job easier and cheaper, the process includes many other 596 or more chemicals, many were harmful and some were unknown. Even though the fluid used in the process is pumped out after doing its job, it's impossible to get it all out. People found black grease, odors, methane, a gassy taste, and black sediments in their drinking water after the…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking occurs when “water wells become plugged up with sand and other minerals. A machine is brought in to inject water into the well at extreme pressure to blow out the tiny cracks and fissures in the rock through which the water flow.” (Fracking Threatens Everyone) Completely harmless. Or so it seemed at that time. Today dealing with increased pollution, it contaminated this ‘wonderful’ thing. “Fracking injects large quantities of water under great pressure with sand and many toxic chemicals mixed in. Many of these are can cause cancer…Unfortunately, when fracking goes wrong, sources of drinking water ca be ruined and all different types of pollution can happen in a second.” (Fracking Threatens Everyone) Just like that, in a blink of an eye, something wonderful was turned around and causes more problems than we can…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A controversial new method of extracting natural gas from the earth has become a danger for Americans. This method is called Hydraulic Fracturing, or Fracking. This drilling has made it possible to retrieve methane gas trapped in the shale rock that lays thousands of feet below the ground. For some, fracking can be seen as a good thing for our country. Fracking is boosting the nation’s economy, creating jobs and energy export opportunities, and strengthening the energy independence of the United States. Although it may help in some aspects, it comes at a very high cost to the American people. Fracking is extremely harmful to the water supply, the environment, and the population.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Counter arguments against hydraulic fracturing include the lack of government regulations, and environmental issues. While most energy companies are conscientious and put forth every effort to make fracking safe, without oversight, some companies are reeking havoc on communities, individuals, and nature. John Rumpler, Senior Attorney for Environment America, says those taking advantage of unrestricted production are responsible for complaints of coercion, contaminated drinking water, flammable well water, physical illnesses of those living close to sites, noise pollution, death of domestic animals and wildlife, and destruction of pristine landscapes (Bambrick). Consequently, the 2005 Energy Policy Act made fracking exempt from the Clean Water…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays