After 6 years of imprisonment, Lindy Chamberlain was released from prison due to new evidence of which suggested that she was an innocent woman. The conduct of the legal system throughout this case demonstrated flaws of which led to the false accusation and the arrest of Lindy Chamberlain. Several aspects of the case created difficulties of the management of the case including; the involvement of the media, the collection of the evidence, the Jury and the presentation of evidence in the court. The Lindy Chamberlain Case began in 1980 and did not become resolved until more than 3 decades later.…
Now this is where market and morals come into play. The judge that was honoring the case had to decide whether enforcing the contract would be the right thing to do. Of course a deal is deal, two adults had formed a voluntary agreement that offered benefits to both parties. But then you might say that in this particular case, this obviously wasn’t any ordinary commercial deal. Mary Beth didn’t know her outcome of emotions for the baby and one can argue that her judgment was beclouded by the need of money. Also some people might find it objectionable to buy and sell babies. It can be argued that this practice can exploit women by treating pregnancy as a money making business, in which behavior enforces the concept of market and morality.…
A new ethical discussion is emerging in the oncology world due to overwhelming advances in fertility preservation in all age groups. The journal article “The Ethics of Fertility Preservation for Paediatric Cancer Patients: From Offer to Rebuttable Presumption” addresses the pressing need to discuss the ethics of failing to preserve fertility as this current practice may no longer be considered ethically appropriate for populations for whom established techniques are available. The current standard practice involves merely offering the option of fertility preservation procedures to children and young adults with cancer. Previous ethical discussions of fertility preservation have focused on the question of whether it is appropriate to perform fertility preservation procedures for a particular patient. The question at the heart of this article suggests the new discussion needs to address the question, “is failing to proceed with fertility preservation ethically justifiable?’” (McDougall 2015). The article gives some…
The root of the argument stems from the lack of a decisive role that is responsible for making decisions when faced with conflicting moral issues. The doctors felt that an agreement with the mother regarding treatment should be followed until, according to their best judgment, she is no longer capable of making the decision on her own. The doctor is put in an ambiguous position to make a final decision since it would seem that his professional opinion is secondary to the choices of the mother. It was argued that a spouse or parent could make the decision at this point, rather than the doctor, especially if it were concerning the care for the as-yet unborn child. However, the rights of the unborn child are called into question if the choice may potentially cause the death of the child. At this point, the doctors looked towards legislative measures to not only protect themselves from legal action, but to establish some sort of precedent to follow. However, even the judge was hesitant to take on the role and stated that it should be judged on a case by case basis. Whether they maintain the agreement with the mother, or alter treatment to save the child, the doctors will always be in conflict when determining where the doctor/patient relationship lies and when it is appropriate to take action against the will of the…
Totenberg, N. (2012, March 21). Court: No Benefits For Kids Conceived After Dad Died. Retrieved from npr.org: http://www.npr.org/2012/05/21/153224630/court-no-benefits-for-kids-conceived-after-dad-died…
van Niekerk, A., & van Zyl, L. (1995). The ethics of surrogacy: Women 's reproductive labour. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21(6), 345-345. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/216336102?accountid=32521…
Many parents would do anything for their children. But how far would some parents go just to benefit them in caring for their own child? In the Pillow Angel Ashley case the parents were ethically wrong in requesting her reproductive organs be removed. It was not only medically unnecessary, it was also against the law, and it was all done for the benefit of the parents.…
Induced abortion is just one of the multitudes of bioethical dilemmas that a physician is charged with confronting. The act of inducing abortion is a controversial subject that involves many potentially competing factors such as an individual’s moral and religious compass, what rights an unborn fetus has and the rights that a woman has over her own body. In the case of a 16 year-old girl who is pregnant as a result of incest and seeking an abortion, my role as the practitioner would be to put the health of the patient first - above all personal bias.…
In the case of the baby, the moral issue is also of quality of life. The mother has decided to not have the surgery performed and have nutrients taken away from her child. The baby has lived for less than ten hours and obviously cannot yet make a decision for herself. If the surgery was to be performed and the baby fully recovered, the quality of life would still come into play. Because she does not know how it is to live with working limbs, she would be able to cope and learn how to function better than in Dawson’s case. Although she would be would most likely cope better without limbs, the question arises of ‘what would she be able to do on her own?’ She would need someone to be with her at all times: to feed her, bath her, go to the restroom with her, dress her, and all other everyday tasks. Thus, the quality of life in this child should be considered when deciding if she should have the surgery to remove the anomalies or not.…
The first half of this provision is the most relevant provision for me because not only am I responsible for the laboring mother, but I am also responsible for her unborn child. The decisions and actions that I choose to do or don’t do greatly affect the health and well being of both patients.…
I was very shocked to read this newspaper article about this poor woman and everything she went thru for the state of medical and media views of her baby. This is a good view on medical ethics. I hope it doesn’t happen to another woman. We have the right to do what we will with our bodies and the state or hospital can’t force us to anything. I hope I covered everything in my paper. My paper is a bioethical and legal I believe. Thank…
#5 Which items in the statement were easiest to project and why? Which were the most difficult and why? What effect could mis-estimates have had on projections? Which items would cause the most damage if mis-estimated?…
* In 1987, Angela Carter, who was dying of cancer, also refused a C-section. She sought to remain pregnant until the 28th week of pregnancy, the point at which doctors had once told her her baby would have the best chance to survive. At 26 weeks, however, physicians felt that the child had a 50% chance of surviving outside Angela’s dying body, and virtually none if the surgery was not performed. Angela’s condition had deteriorated to the point that her understanding of the implications of refusing the surgery was unclear, but she seemed to refuse the operation. Her distraught husband and mother would not consent to the surgery.…
The article I chose was “Illegal Operations: Women, Doctors, and Abortion, 1886-1939,” by Angus McLaren. The overall concept of the article was on how laws affected the women’s way of receiving the assistance they needed to carry out fertility control or commonly referenced in the article as “induction of miscarriage.” The author addresses the prospective of the women, doctors, male affiliate in quietus, and the court, in the era of the late nineteenth, early twentieth centuries.…
I feel that if a child's tissue was taken instead of an adult's, it wouldn't be a completely different argument. I feel that it would be the same argument but more intense because a child is not able of making autonomous decisions by themselves. In other words, taking tissue from a child unknowingly not only goes behind the child's back but it also goes behind the parents' backs because they are in charge of the child. Furthermore, "because children have not yet developed their capacities, it seems wrong to subject them to risks that might alter the course of their lives for the worse" (pg. 156). If the news came out about the tissue being taken from a child, I feel that there would have been a large backlash against the medical community.…