He even goes as far to say that all in all the state would not benefit from the combination but religion would thus there is no practical need for the merging of the two. He supports this claim by stating that the combination infringes of keeping a limited government and promotes conformity. It also limits the citizens who would want to join New England which limits a diverse society. (152-54) All of these men had the common belief that the opinions of one man should not dictate the beliefs of another because it infringes on the natural rights of every free man. This is the key reason they argues for the separation of church and
He even goes as far to say that all in all the state would not benefit from the combination but religion would thus there is no practical need for the merging of the two. He supports this claim by stating that the combination infringes of keeping a limited government and promotes conformity. It also limits the citizens who would want to join New England which limits a diverse society. (152-54) All of these men had the common belief that the opinions of one man should not dictate the beliefs of another because it infringes on the natural rights of every free man. This is the key reason they argues for the separation of church and