Preview

Summary Of The Toulmin Model Of Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Toulmin Model Of Argument
His model include six components. English professor Michaella Thornton, St. Louis Community College at Meramec, explains the basic components of the Toulmin framework and why Stephen Toulmin's model is especially helpful in dissecting and analyzing everyday arguments. The three main keys are data (grounds)or as an evidence, warrant and claim (Thorton, M.( 2014). The Toulmin Model of Argument. Retireved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEIHCxpKSTM).
Claim- the point or an idea the arguer or author is trying to get across to the audience. Three type of claim facts, judgements/value, and policy.
Data- the proof or evidence an arguer or author offers to the audience. Based on three things: evidence, source and analysis.
Warrant- An inferential leap that connects the claim with the ground.
Rest of them are supporting materials: backing as an additional evidence, qualifiers and rebuttals.
Backing - is additional justification for the warrant.
Qualifier this segment of the argument shares how sure or probable the arguer or author thinks his or her claim is.
Rebuttal- One of the most important aspects of the argument as the rebuttal acknowledges possible limitations or exceptions to the arguer or author’s claim.
Using Toulmin model supports are more when do the research,
…show more content…
However, just thinking about to add novelty to the following: seatbelts, making a sandwich, television violence, writing a resume. For seatbelt I want to add a softness. It will not hurt the person sitting next to you. For sandwich I want to add a butter and jam. Television violence is huge problem. So to fix this problem we can use the technologies. Nowadays technologies are can do everything. For TV, especially for violence one, I can add the fingerprinting of adult. Only with the adult they can watch. Into a resume, I will add the photos such as, photos from previous job, photos from volunteering and so

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    3) Next, you will be required to write a Toulmin’s model of warranted assent diagram to explain the attempts to persuade the reader. This includes a demonstration of the major claims made in the artifact and the warrant for those claims, as well as the implied justification of the artifact’s claims. This section should be at least two paragraphs and at most four paragraphs long.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the philosopher’s view: The Toulmin Model has four parts to an argument: the first is “the claim”, which is your thesis or the purpose of what you are disputing. The second is “the grounds”; which is leaving no uncertainty to the meaning and reasoning of your claim. The third is “the warrant”, which ties the purpose of the claim and the grounds together. Finally “the backing” which is theory of reasoning that may be needed to influence the audience if the warrant is not accepted. The Toulmin method is an outline of how to state your arguments in more of an analytical way. It allows you to break down the argument in different part so we can make a conclusion on how well the different part work together, as well as an effective way to get to the how and the why.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part 2: Does the author supply backing for the warrants? No, she does not. The essay is filled with her opinions and supposition with no backing or proof.…

    • 536 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case for reparation Introduction Stephen Toulmin was a British philosopher who had devoted himself in the work of moral reasoning. Throughout his writing, he had sought to develop practical arguments that can be used in evaluating the ethics behind the moral issues. Toulmin model of argumentation has a diagram that contains six interrelated components that are considered when analyzing arguments. On the other hand, The Case for Reparation that has two hundred and fifty years of slavery, Jim Crow of 90 years and the 35 years of racist housing policy.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article Andrew Ferguson wrote an article called "Efforts to Ban Cell Phone Use While Driving Are Misguided”. He talks about a government official named Ray LaHood who is the secretary of transportation, refers to the Ban on Cell Phone use while driving not necessarily banning any distraction while driving but LaHood focuses specifically on texting and driving as if there is no other distraction that could have taken place to cause an accident or fatality. Andrew Ferguson, who is a senior editor at the Weekly Standard, says that LaHood is not focusing on the bigger picture. He further states that LaHood is not experienced enough to really give a good…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adele Douglas and J. Kenji Lopez-Alt both start their argumentative piece by defining who their argument is targeted to as well as what they will be arguing. Over the course of the two contrasting papers, they both use similar and contrasting methods to try and convince the reader of their opinion. By doing this, a number of flaws as well as good techniques can be seen in both writings.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two pieces of writing from Sheingold and Polleta both analyze how law can play a role in advancing rights claims in public policy.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I completely agree with you when you mentioned how people do not utilize a Toulmin argument as much because a lot of people do not have strong opinions on topics anymore or at least they do not express it. When I was making my response to this prompt and had to find an example of where people use the Toulmin argument format I had some trouble. Your explanation helped to answer my problem.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A successful argument depends upon the balance between these elements. The claim is the basis of the argument. A big opposing viewpoint, called the counterargument, is constantly pushing down on one side or the other. Balance can only be achieved by providing enough evidence to support the claim along w/rebuttal of the counterargument. Essentially, an argument depends on research (evidence) & finding flaws in opposing viewpoints (rebuttal). Each claim made needs this support to be valid.…

    • 932 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    _______ Judge the overall effectiveness of the author’s argument in the conclusion and give a brief summary…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reflective Statement Goal I: In my essay 1: Toulmin argument, my goal was to persuade my audience that my perspective in response to my topic is logical, accurate, truthful esc. The purpose of my essay was to reveal to students in my academic major what it takes to graduate from Rowan University with a degree in physical therapy which is my major. But it was not only that also I need to make sure that my essay was in MLA formatted and used many different sources to support my views. In my paper I had to revise many time because I had problem with getting my source and also in my conclusion I had trouble.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voss & Van Dyke’s article titled Argumentation in Psychology: Background Comments describes the various components of Toulmin’s theory. The datum and claim give the basis for the argument and are connected by the warrant, which takes the form of “If (datum), then (claim).” (Voss & Van Dyke 2011, 95). Voss and Van Dyke describe the backing as evidence and information that supports the warrant, while the qualifier gives a statement of strength for the warrant. Finally, they describe the rebuttal as a closer that discusses the limitations of the argument (Voss & Van Dyke 2011, 95).…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argument: connecting evidence to the thesis – *See the Document Analysis Sheets for your Inferences/Arguments! Be sure to thoroughly explain your evidence!…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Logical Fallacies

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement that can be either true or false that is offered to support a claim. The claim is the conclusion that can be either true or false. Arguments can be deductive or inductive.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Types of Arguments

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Normally we classify all arguments into one of two types: deductive and inductive. Deductive arguments are those meant to work because of their pattern alone, so that if the premises are true the conclusion could not be false. All other arguments are considered to be inductive (or just non-deductive), and these are meant to work because of the actual information in the premises so that if the premises are true the conclusion is not likely to be false. The difference is between certainty (we can be sure the conclusion is correct) and probability (we can bet on the conclusion being correct).…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays