Preview

Summary Of The Treatise Of Human Nature By David Hume

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1178 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Treatise Of Human Nature By David Hume
In Hume part 3 of the Treatise of Human Nature, it starts with going to explain the direct passions that arise from pleasure or pain.

Hume explains that motives bring us to action. He then talks about direct passions and perfunctory definition of the will as an impression we feel then he looks at the problem of free will and determinism. In the first section, he makes an argument for the idea of necessity. The problem is whether human action is determined by necessity with physical necessity or if necessity governs physical objects. Hume believes he has the answer to these problems like uniformity found in human action is the same as in the natural world and that inferences on mortality is the same as the inferences in the natural
…show more content…
Hume believes that reason is unable to oppose the passions and that the passions is not the opposite of reason in equality. He believes that reason alone cannot motivate us but perform simple reasoning. Only abstract truth can influence us our simple reasoning for example doing school work to get a good grade and simple reasoning influences us only giving us motivates. Since reason cannot motivation the passions therefore it can’t control it but rather passion control the reasons. Passions cannot disagree with reason, since the passions only represent itself for example when we think the passions are being unreasonable but later find out it our judgment that is wrong understanding the passion. He believes that fight between reason and passions is actually a fight between two different kinds of passions, one being the calm passion and the other violent passion. Both the calm passion and reason act with the same calmness therefore we mistake them for the same thing.

In section 4-8, Humes talks about what gives passions their motivational force. Both violence passions and claim passions can be strong, but overall the violent passions can influence the will more. He looks at events that could increase the violence of passions in us like swallow with violence. Having love with strength can make for a violent passion if it has anger. Hume then talks about repeated activity starting
…show more content…
Some direct passions comes from pleasure or pain due to the instinct that brings us towards pleasure or away from pain. Hume looks at joy and grief from a pleasure or pain point of view. He also looks at hope and fear in the same way. Added also is Desire and aversion from pleasure or pain with the will seeing if pleasure or pain is within our power to get. Hume talks about direct passions come from instinct, which is unable to be explain like anger and lust. The instinctual passions makes good and evil rather than the other direct passions, which comes from pleasure and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume and Berkeley both separated in the middle of reason and sensation. Hume, be that as it may, went encourage, trying to demonstrate that reason and sane judgments are only constant relationship of unmistakable sensations or encounters. ‘’Hume believed that morality was based on feelings of sympathy with other people, and that benevolence towards others tends to promote the interests of our species, and bestow happiness on human society.”(humanism) Hume's contributes to monetary hypothesis, which affected the Scottish scholar and business analyst Adam Smith and later financial specialists, incorporated his conviction that riches depends not on cash but rather on products and his acknowledgment of the impact of social conditions on financial matters. In his moral considering, Hume held that the idea of good and bad is not levelheaded but rather emerges from a respect for one's own particular…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been a number of challenges questioning Hume’s sympathy. Some questioned the subjectivity of sympathy, since there should be an objective basis for moral evaluation, and sentiments, being the product of sympathy which is subjective to some extent, is not entirely an objective basis for moral evaluation. Some others challenged Hume with the “virtue in rags” argument, which suggests that sometimes good motives do not bring about pleasure in anyone, but we still approve of such motives, which is inexplicable by Hume’s sympathy. Another challenge is called the weak sympathy problem, which challenges Hume’s sympathy by pointing out that Hume only allows us to sympathize with others at a particular instant, and the object of sympathy is…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussing the principles from which we determine moral good or evil, virtue or vice, Hume argues that because the number of situations we may encounter is 'infinite' it would be absurd to imagine an 'original instinct' or individual principle for each possibility. (T3.1.2.6)1 Instead he suggests that, following the usual maxim of nature producing diversity from limited principles, we should look for more general principles.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The interaction of emotional and arousal to motivation was gathered in 1884 and 1885 from William James and Carl Lange. James and Lange believed a person’s emotions occur because of Psychological events that they suffer from. For instance, if a person is the victim of a tragic event, this can cause post-traumatic stress syndrome. This cause’s fear from that movement on and at times causes the person to withdraw from the event or anything pertaining to it due to fear.…

    • 326 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Liberty and Necessity

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Section 8 of Hume’s Enquiry titled “Of Liberty and Necessity”, Hume wants to discuss what liberty and necessity mean and whether or not they can be compatible with each other. This is all really a discussion of Hume’s view of free will and determinism, and how they can be easily reconciled through compatibilism where for example both liberty and necessity are required for morality. He starts off by considering the idea of necessity and defines it as, “the constant conjunction of similar objects, and the consequent inference from one to another” (Hume 150). He wants to talk about its relation to what he calls liberty. He defines his hypothetical liberty as, “A power of acting or not acting, according to the determinations of the will” (Hume 159). This sounds like free will, meaning that people have the ability to act or not act in certain ways. He wants to deny any possibility of chance, because he’s an empiricist, and if you have the possibility of chance, what can you ever really know about the world. In every case, Hume is going to want to go out into the world and see where things come from even these ideas of liberty and necessity to see if there is a way to have both. To take it further, he goes on to claim that we’re all compatibilists without even realizing it. In order to explain his reasoning, he makes three arguments: the necessity argument, the spontaneity argument, and the anti-libertarianism argument.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy, under Hume’s definition, clearly varies in terms of degree with the different connections the objects of sympathy have with us: we are more able to sympathize with a person close to us than with an indifferent stranger, and we sympathize more readily with our compatriot than with a person from another country with a different color of skin, as implied by the principle of association of ideas. Moral evaluations, on contrary, should not vary with the relationships the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy, which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons, with different relationships with us, share…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s arguments were actually responding to the argument as outlined by thinkers such as Plato, Cicero and Aquinas. Hume analyses four of the main premises laid out in a standard Teleological argument and deconstructs them in order to find fault within the logic. The first one that I shall present is Hume’s argument to disparage the claim that one can find only order and good design within the universe. Hume throws the omnipotence and benevolence of God into question when he highlights the fact that there is much suffering and pain and evidence of bad design in the world around us. It is easy to suggest that the world is not harmonious within the workings and regulations of itself and this is shown by the vast amount of suffering, disease,…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed that what we see is based on our experiences and ideas, and we do not act with reason. Imagination creates complex ideas. Hume opposed the idea of an eternal soul, and questioned the laws of nature and existence of God.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although I disagree with his opinion, Hume exhibits a very sensible argument. David Hume explains four essential circumstances. First of which, Hume believes that God should dispose of all pain. Because both pain and pleasure stimulate humans equally, why should we be able to experience pain? For example, as regular humans we experience feelings such as thirst and hunger, instead of being able to feel the pain of it, we should just be feeling a lack of pleasure. Why is it necessary to feel pain when I simply want to eat or drink something? Secondly, God should eliminate all general laws of nature. For example, if a car crash is about to happen, God should interfere and insure that no person will come to death or extreme injury/pain. Next, God should not dispense talents and abilities unevenly between each of his creations. “God” created animals that obtain optimal strength, ability to fly, and run incredible speeds, while humans are left with minimal physical strengths. God also created people that are talented in sports, making life easier to stay in shape and a possible career by pursuing these particular talents, while there are others who have no special talent and are forced to take extra measures in order to gain fitness and a future career. God should have given equality to all of his creations. Finally, Nature seems to have defects that allow us to see that sometimes…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His education was through a faith based system that he knew that this information was impounded into his mind. So reasoning was out, he accepted the education he received but felt that learning from the world itself to obtain knowledge was far important. He know that we were all born with reasoning skills that will help us through our lives and education is the key factor becoming knowledgeable. Many faith based individual are not knowledgeable of their minds, they are too into the customs that they have been brought up. This is what shapes their so called reason even it disobeys the laws of nature. This is their capacity of reasoning and unfortunately people who have doubts are considered atheist. This is what Hume encountered in his time, being known as an atheist. Hume only wanted to determine an argument that was from centuries old known miracles, that it was the possibility of falsity of man’s testimonies. Humes Quote from section 2 “Nothing is so convenient as a decisive argument of this kind, which must at least silence the most arrogant bigotry and superstition, and free us from their impertinent solicitations. I flatter myself, that I have discovered an argument of a like nature, which, if just, will, with the wise and learned, be an everlasting check to all kinds of superstitious delusion”. As Hume provided with his views on miracles and not relying on testimonies. From…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Emotions can also be products of prejudice, selfishness or cultural conditioning, for example the treatment of different races as inferior and slavery were the result of people’s feelings telling them it was God’s plan.…

    • 2613 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says that when we think about a wound, we automatically think about the pain it can cause. This is the idea of cause and affect. Hume thinks that impressions or beliefs are more firm, lively, forcible and steady. Belief and fiction are the same concept in his mind.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays