Particularly powerful is his argument that Western thinking about development today is still influenced by its history of colonizing ‘inferior’ peoples; without confronting the past, we cannot escape its ugly legacy of trampling on rights.
Next, Easterly considers the debate on “The wellbeing of nations vs. that of individuals.” Here, the author reflects on the way national goals and metrics on development tend to miss the more important picture of how individual people are affected. Beginning with a provocative exposition defending “brain drain” and the right to migrate, this section challenged my preconceptions on what it really looks like to treat the individual rights of poor people seriously.
The book’s third debate centers on the effectiveness of “conscious direction vs. spontaneous solutions.” In extolling the power of local individuals and market incentives to create impactful change in communities, Easterly makes a persuasive (though somewhat partisan) case for the model of free development that he advocates for in his fourth debate, which spans the entire book—“free vs. authoritarian