Monk (2011, p. 95) explain three forms of intersectionality represented by Cashew: First is Political Intersectionality focuses social problems faced by women such as violence against women and also outlines and investigates feminist movements and antiracist politics (Monk, 2011, p. 96), this form can also be relevant but not a reasonable choice as it has more broader scope including agendas and policies for women belong to different ethnicities as Vardeman, et al., (2013, p. 392) also explained that political intersectionality has policies and procedures by organizations and their implementation and also analyse the rights of groups because of their mix ethinicities., and this research is about the women of one city. According to Cashew political intersectionality is an effective approach to investigate that race and culture contributes to violence against women (Monk, 2011, p. 96). This form of intersectionality according to Crenshaw is conflicting political agendas which are not formulated with a perspective of needs or political vision of women and thus ends up with a denial of subordination of women (Carastathis, 2014, pp. 306-307), and the same situation of different identity case is with representational intersectionality. Second, Representational Intersectionality analyse cultural issues of ethnicised women who are suppress and ignore by the leadership. It analyses different forms of intersection like, race, class, gender, age, ethnicity, …show more content…
(Monk, 2011, p. 96). Carastathis (2014, p. 307) added that representational intersectionality deals with women of colour and the production of their images drawn on gender and race concepts and also the marginalisation of