By making this sweeping yet amorphous claim, he is being organicistic himself, excluding the non-living / inorganic components of nature from making an impact in the ‘mesh’ he is theorizing. Even if Morton has extended desire to make it inclusive of other non-erotic, non-anthropocentric pleasures, it remains unclear to me where desire can be located in times of natural disasters, like when a storm surge swallows ones house whole. Do typhoons possess desire? If Morton says yes, then he will have greatly reconfigured queer theory to become very much akin to new materialism, where matter and its potentiality of always becoming (its ‘desire’ maybe?) get primacy over queering discursive
By making this sweeping yet amorphous claim, he is being organicistic himself, excluding the non-living / inorganic components of nature from making an impact in the ‘mesh’ he is theorizing. Even if Morton has extended desire to make it inclusive of other non-erotic, non-anthropocentric pleasures, it remains unclear to me where desire can be located in times of natural disasters, like when a storm surge swallows ones house whole. Do typhoons possess desire? If Morton says yes, then he will have greatly reconfigured queer theory to become very much akin to new materialism, where matter and its potentiality of always becoming (its ‘desire’ maybe?) get primacy over queering discursive