"People of all cultures and ages," Carlson writes, "create explanations for phenomena they do not understand" (72). Where court transcripts and other sources of the time describe…
When looking at “The Ministers black veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorn, Elaine Barry makes a strong case for the central symbols such as the veil, and people have such a strong ambiguity. She makes the case that it helps describes “Hawthorn’s distrust of moral certainties, but also his sense of artistic bankruptcy” (Barry 1).…
I have a natural tendency to take a strictly observational approach when learning about or studying anything having to do with religion, but this approach also makes me slightly skeptical of all of the religious stories I read or learn about. Of the various views of Francis’s stigmata that were presented in this paper, I find myself siding with Spoto. I like the fact that he looks at any possible historical influences that occur when people of the time tried to give a description of Francis’s stigmata, and approve of and agree with his suggestion that Francis’ saw his suffering from illness as a parallel to Jesus’ suffering on the Cross, and saw his physical marks from his illness as something similar to Jesus’ Stigmata. It was this intensity that Francis had with his worship of God that allowed him and his followers to honestly believe that Francis had been blessed with the…
The “minimal facts approach” to the resurrection question is an approach that focuses on the lowest common denominator of agreed upon facts. For the most part, all facts presented within this approach meet two criteria: “they are well evidenced and nearly every scholar accepts them” (Habermas & Licona, 2004, p. 44). This approach only considers strongly attested historical data. So strongly in fact, that they are almost universally granted by nearly every scholar, both the skeptical and believing. The basic premise of this approach follows the presentation of five facts. Acceptance is almost universal for the first four facts whereas the fifth fact, although it has a preponderance of evidence in its favor, does not enjoy the same consensus.…
"I could tell you(Alcinous) much more, along tale, of the suffering I've had . by the will of the Gods."(VII, 226-227).…
The nature of existence in the Kingdom of the Dead is dissimilar to the Christian ideal of heave; the Kingdom of the Dead is a dismal place to be. Odysseus describes them as “shambling, shiftless dead” (p. 251). Existing in the Kingdom of the Dead is not a pleasing affair. People exist in death exactly how they died; the “men of war” are still wearing the bloody armor they died in (p. 250). The dead seem to be able to remember who they are, but they are not able to speak until Odysseus allows them to touch or “approach” the blood Odysseus spilt from the sheep (p. 254). Once they do so, the dead can only speak the truth (p. 254). If Odysseus were to ignore them, they would fade away (p. 254). To reach the dead, Odysseus uses milk and honey,…
The north and the west and the south are good hunting ground, but it is forbidden to go east. It is forbidden to go to any of the Dead Places except to search for metal and then he who touches the metal must be a priest or the son of a priest. Afterwards, both the man and the metal must be purified. These are the rules and the laws; they are well made. It is forbidden to cross the great river and look upon the place that was the Place of the Gods—this is most strictly forbidden. We do not even say its name though we know its name. It is there that spirits live, and demons—it is there that there are the ashes of the Great Burning. These things are forbidden—they have been forbidden since the beginning of time.My father is a priest; I am the son of a priest. I have been in the Dead Places near us, with my father—at first, I was afraid. When my father went into the house to search for the metal, I stood by the door and my heart felt small and weak. It was a dead man's house, a spirit house. It did not have the smell of man, though there were old bones in a corner. But it is not fitting that a priest's son should show fear. I looked at the bones in the shadow and kept my voice still.Then my father came out with the metal— a good, strong piece. He looked at me with both eyes but I had not run away. He gave me the metal to hold—I took it and did not die. So he knew that I was truly his son and would be a priest in my time. That was when I was very young—nevertheless, my brothers would not have done it, though they are good hunters. After that, they gave me the good piece of meat and the warm corner of the fire. My father watched over me—he was glad that I should be a priest. But…
stumbled when I saw" (IV.i.173), he seems to be illustrating the realization of his own…
‘Come, you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here and fill me from the crown to the toe topfull of direst cruelty…’ (p.15)…
As István Czachesz stated in The grotesque Body in Early Christian Discourse: Hell, Scatology and Metamorphosis, Scatological humour is “…the simplest and perhaps the most ancient dramatic device to make readers, onlookers and listeners laugh…” ¹. Bearing this assertion in mind, as a part of this analysis, we shall discuss the significance of Scatological humour as a means of underpinning the integral themes of: le pet dou vilain, le farce de menuyer and la chanson d’audigier. In addition, we shall contrast and compare these three farces with regard to their application of this literary device. This is in order that, as contemporary readers, we can grasp the motivation behind the usage of Scatological humour during this period, whilst ascertaining its function in medieval literature.…
Paul D narrates how his scapes had been unsuccessful, and how when “he got to Mobile he had seen more dead people than living ones”(pg.317)…
Cited: Ghose, Indira. “Jesting With Death: Hamlet In The Graveyard.” Textual Practice 24.6 (2010): 1003-1018. Academic Search Complete. Web. 30 Jan. 2014…
Two stories that share a similar journey for the truth are The Book of Job and Oedipus Rex. However, man’s struggle for the truth is a theme that exists in literature of all kinds. The desire for the truth and the journey to reach it is what caused the fall of Adam and Eve in the ancient Hebrew creation story. It is also the same force that cursed Oedipus in Sophocles’ play. Newfound knowledge plagues Charlie in Flowers for Algernon and Job’s sudden epiphany in The Book of Job would come at the cost of his family and his fortune.…
Dickinson writes about transfer of power through royalty, and how it flows silently. She expresses the theme “peaceful ignorance” through the line “Safe in their Alabaster Chambers -.” While the dead lie there in their own tomb carvings they are safe by the blockage of their peaceful ignorance. She describes the dead in their chambers, unaware of the events that have followed their deaths. They know nothing that is being taken place outside of their tombs and lack the knowledge of who holds power in their place. In a similar matter, the dead are “Untouched by Morning - / And untouched by noon -” which shows that they are not conscious of the ages postmortem. She symbolizes Jesus’ promise through the line “Sleep the Meek Members of Resurrection.”…
85–87 “That strain I heard was of a higher mood.” The sudden appearance of the god…