There are two sides to every argument, and that includes the disagreements over population and world hunger. New Malthusians are people that agree with the theories of Thomas Malthus, who said that if the people do not control the number of births occurring each year, the population will eventually outstrip its food supply. This theory is supported by the incredible boom in …show more content…
population in recent years, especially in the Least Industrialized Nations. Anti-Malthusians see things differently. They believe that the population goes through transitions in stages. This is based on the demographic transition of Europe. They believe that right now the Least Industrialized Nations are in Stage 2, a population explosion, and that soon they will enter Stage 3, when the population will stabilize. The Anti-Malthusians also make a point that there is more food in the world now for each person than there was in 1950. There is enough food, it is just not making it to the places that need it the most.
One fact you can’t argue with is that 852 million people around the world are hungry, up from 842 million last year. Every year, 10.5 million children under the age of five die from disease and malnutrition as a result of hunger (30hourfamine.org.). these are some scary numbers, and they would seem to support the New Malthusian’s theory. What’s more startling about these numbers is that most of these people are condensed into a few large areas – not just spread out all over the world. Almost all of the most-starved populations are located throughout South Asia and Central, Southern, and East Africa (wfp.org). In these areas, especially the rural areas, the parents are to poor to feed themselves or their children, who in turn cannot feed themselves or their children. They cannot afford to buy tools to create income to help better their situation. These people are part of a poverty cycle they cannot escape from without help (wfp.org).
There is a lot being done to help these starving people: The 30 Hour Famine is a Christian program that encourages youth groups to get together and do their part to help raise money and awareness for the hungry and poverty-stricken families in places like Sudan and Kenya.
Once the fund-raising is over, the groups then go 30 hours without food so that they can have a better understanding of what it is really like to be hungry.
Arguably the most important hunger organization is the United Nations Food Program. They aim to improve nutrition and quality of life of the world’s most vulnerable people at critical times in their lives. They also organize emergency operations and promote awareness. But perhaps the most significant job they do is enabling development by helping people build assets that benefit them directly; helping poor communities build a future (wfp.org). This will help these people start to break these cycles of poverty – a chance they never would have had without the Food
Program.
As I’ve said, populations suffering from chronic hunger are mostly based in the Least Industrialized Nations. However, there are hungry people everywhere, even in your hometown. I work for the Salvation Army, and we try to help these people feed themselves and their families. We serve meals and give food packages, but we also help people with their applications to get government food assistance, or help to locate a job so that they can buy their own food. Sometimes people just need a good meal in their stomachs so that they feel able to take on the world again, and it is a good feeling to be able to help those people achieve that.
Feeding the billions of people in the world is not easy, especially as already suffering nations keep contributing to the booming population growth. If the Anti-Malthusians are right, this population boom will subside. If not, and the New Malthusians are correct, the problem of world hunger will only get worse as the population increases. They say that we will know for sure in this lifetime. Whatever the case, each person should do their part to help fight world hunger now in their own way.