Preview

Summary: The Debate Over Assisted Suicide

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2711 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: The Debate Over Assisted Suicide
The Debate Over Assisted Suicide
Kristen Brittingham
ILR 260
Dr. Dee Griffin
April 2014
Abstract
Should assisted suicide be legal in hospitals? Those who are against assisted suicide argue that it goes against the Hippocratic oath that medical personnel take when they get their license. They also say that, a patient could feel pressured by other sources affecting the decision for assisted suicide and that doctors could possibly give a wrong death prognosis ending a patients life to soon. On the other hand, those who are in favor of assisted suicide insist that as a human we should have the right to choose to die. They also argue that, assisted suicide can prevent more painful deaths caused by desperation and that it could be a great opportunity
…show more content…
Any decision that a human makes in their lifetime can be influenced by something else other than their own feelings. It could be the family members encouraging them to have the procedure done because they feel like a burden to the family. The families medical bills could be adding up due to the costly procedure that need to be done to keep them living as long as possible. It could even be because of the fact that in our society we value youth, health, and beauty. For instance, Zeno, the founder of stoic philosophy, had committed suicide on his own at 98 years old because he had fallen down a flight of stairs and pulled his toe. Zeno had been so tired of his life at 98 that he had made any excuse to no longer stay alive, and he didn’t even have a terminal illness. In the United States, the suicide rate is approximately 12.5 people per 100,000 people commit suicide on their own, 2% to 4% of those suicides account for those who have a terminal illness. People who are against assisted suicide are afraid that if we make it an option, if could make this suicide rate all that much more in the United States (Osgood, …show more content…
A terminal prognosis allows a physician to create a plan of action for his or her patient and to create an easier dying process. Prognosis estimates are very rarely accurate, only 20% of estimates are usually correct. A Physician can predict a patients death by seeing if they have, a failing functional status, high number of white blood cells, extreme weight loss, dysphagia, etc. (Daugherty & Hlubocky, 2008). It is found that 63% of all death prognoses are overestimates and only 17% are underestimates. When an estimate is to high patients may have unnecessary treatments given to them, while when an estimate is to low there could be severe consequences of delayed intervention for the patient. On average, physicians overestimate 5.3 times longer than the time the patient actually lived (Easton, 2000). The accuracy of a death prognosis increases about 70% when it is less than a 14 day estimate. The inaccuracies in a patient’s prognosis could be a huge problem especially when a patient is deciding whether or not they want to have assisted suicide. Both families and patients have a hard time when the death prognosis is accurate (Daugherty & Hlubocky, 2008). Helping to aid in someone’s death without completely accurate information could take away an unnecessary amount of time that the patient may have to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The opposition believes that patients could be pressured into ending their life in order to relieve their family of his or her degrading presence, or how it would be more cost efficient to end life compared to continuing to receive healthcare treatments (Reasons to Oppose Physician-Assisted Suicide). In the court of law, prosecution for these comments to patients is difficult to prove, so it is assumed that PAS has more complications than survival. However, reasonable people who are mentally capable of making their own decisions about terminating their lives, will not let someone sway their decision making so easily. These patients can feel the pain and misery they are suffering, allowing them to make rational decisions about if death will put them at rest. If the patient thinks that living with their illness can be achieved to their level of tolerance, he or she will decide so. Yes, there is no doubt that making the final decision is heartbreaking, but the patient realizes that living with their illness is worse than death. There are also multiple steps taken to ensure the patient is one-hundred percent confident in his or her decision, through the two verbal requests and written request for PAS, as well as an approved psychiatric state of health (Oregon Death with Dignity…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is based on an ideal of conscious responsibility and control over one's life. In some circumstances when modern medicine cannot ease the physical and/or psychological suffering of a terminally ill patient, forcibly prolonging life is cruel and unnecessary. In such cases, the doctor does more harm by keeping the patient alive against his wishes than by helping him die. A terminally ill person may not want to live "superficially" with the help of modern medical advances since the quality of his life will dramatically decrease. Physical pain is not the only element of suffering; emotional distress is an equally serious concern for those considering physician-assisted suicide. It should not be the place of anyone other than the patient to determine what constitutes intolerable suffering.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everyone has a right to their own opinion when it comes to physician assisted suicide, but what about those patients who are suffering from an incurable type of cancer, or what about the patients that have suffered from a major stroke or even been involved in a major car accident that has left them paralyzed and are unable to care for themselves. Patients who are suffering from an incurable bout with cancer experiences unbearable pain, vomiting, coughing, lack of energy, as well as other debilitating symptoms. Physician assisted suicide occurs when a physician helps someone to end their life rather than a close friend, or a family member. Physician assisted suicide take place when a physician prescribes a drug to their terminally ill patient resulting in that patient’s death. There are many physicians that are against physician assisted suicide because they feel as though it violates the Hippocratic Oath they took, to do no…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide raises many ethical and moral issues. For patients who advocate for PAS, they acknowledged that the act promotes human dignity, autonomy, and is a humanizing act to end their suffering. PAS is an act of healing for the terminal sick to help end their daily struggles and many see it as a dignified choice. It is evident from patients’ voice and Dr. Byock testimonials strikes the heart of the senseless need to keep the terminal ill alive. Along with the inevitable deaths comes costly medical expenses that can better serve to improve the country and the communities’ welfare.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a doctor, you swear to an oath that is to provide lifesaving medical care and to try and extend life comfortably, the best way you can. In “Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong” Ryan T. Anderson states why a physician assisting in a terminally ill patient’s death is ethically and morally wrong. This article that I chose was published on Newsweek on March 26, 2015, but first appeared on The Daily Signal. As the article describes what and how this particular approach works, it goes in great detail to explain why it should not even be an option for physicians.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life is a frail and fragile thing. Each of us considers it to be our most valuable possession given to us from a higher power. Some take it for granted, while some preserve and celebrate it. In a moment’s notice the breath of life can be taken without consent. I was presented with a piece of editorial, to discuss and decipher its contents. I will present my thoughts and answer the questions posted in the editorial.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral and ethical debates attempted to resolves controversial issues but never seem to end with everyone agreeing. Often these ethical and moral debates are complex and involve opinions persuaded by religion or customs and have legal implications to consider. Physician assisted death is one of these very complex and controversial issues that all people will never agree on. Many questions arise in the debate of physician assisted death such as patients’ rights, physicians controlling the right if someone lives or dies, a patience’s mental state, a family member’s rights, religious beliefs of the parties involved and the law. Philosophers attempt to explain the different theories that people will use to argue their belief systems in terms of logic and reasoning. For example, some people may take the position of a deontologist who would argue that it is our moral duty to support and sustain life therefore assisted suicide should not be allowed. Unfortunately, this very emotional thought provoking debate is not a “black and white issue,” as most ethical arguments are not. In the situation of physician assisted death I disagree with the deontologist point of view that it is immoral for a physician to assist a patient in suicide. I believe as some relativist due, that as long as the patient is fully capable of making this decision and the patient is in a constant state of agony, then the patient has the right to make the choice to live or die. A relativist believes that morals are only relative to that particular society and if physician assisted death was considered moral in that group then it would be considered a moral act. Neither theory is without flaws as some deontologist even share my point of view and some relativist can be very extreme in what they feel is relative to being morally right or wrong. The bottom line is that people will probably never completely agree on this subject.…

    • 2640 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not all terminally ill patients will choose this option, but it should be available for those who want it. Coping with the diagnosis of a terminal illness is difficult for both the patient and the patient’s loved ones and it only becomes more difficult as the disease progresses. Being given the ability to decide when to die allows the patient to feel a sense of dignity and control during a time when he or she may not have control over anything else in life. Not only does physician-assisted suicide provide a sense of relief to the patient, it provides relief to family and friends. Watching a loved one die is one of the most challenging things to endure in life. It only becomes more challenging when forced to watch a loved one die a slow and painful death. Physician-assisted suicide can provide closure to everyone involved in a situation dealing with a terminal illness; therefore, it must become legal in all fifty…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease which is cutting a person’s life too short. The concept of physician assisted suicide always provokes a moral predicament for many people all over the world, mostly because it gives someone the freedom to choose whether to live or die. Euthanasia has been debated for many years, on one hand people believe euthanasia is a negative action because suicide is not a way out, but on the other hand people also believe assisted suicide is the only option for a patient who suffers from great pain that will only get worse. Euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be legalized and people shouldn’t worry about whether or not if they feel it’s immoral or not.…

    • 2132 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial ethical dilemma that is receiving a lot of press in society recently. The issue is an emotional debate whether a terminally ill or disabled person has the right to end their existence with the support of their physician, which affects not just the patient, but their families and health care providers. Physician assisted suicide has legal ramifications as well. One argument in favor of Physician assisted suicide alludes to that the patient has the right to end their life with dignity. An opposing argument is if a physician participates in assisted suicide this goes against the “American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Ethics”. A physician and nurse are respected within the community to…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dr. Ann Marie Chiasson believes that Physician Assisted Suicide is inhumane, because it goes against the Hippocratic oath. David Orentlicher created a documentary covering the dark side of Physician Assisted Suicide, and it also showed the lack of responsibility some doctors have over their patients. Finally, Ben Mattlin a terminally ill patient himself claimed that any barriers eliminated would make life scary for him, because they could have easily terminated his life, because of his condition. Physician-Assisted Suicide needs to be criminalized, because it blurs the lines between the doctor and patient relationship, not all patients are mentally competent to make their own decisions, and it violates the Hippocratic oath. The American Medical Association’s morals are where they need to be, but the government needs to remove the state’s right to decide if Physician Assisted Suicide should be allowed. The government needs to outlaw it once and for all. Physician Assisted Suicide is not right, or will it ever…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those in favor of physician-assisted suicide argue that the patients that seek it as a viable option do so because their disease is beyond treatment and other options do not preserve their dignity and right to a peaceful death. In choosing physician assisted suicide, the patient maintains control over their final days and even hours on this earth. They can prepare themselves and their loved ones for their death and knowing when it will happen can often provide a sense of peace. (Cite info in favor of pas here)…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted suicide is an issue that has prompted discussion on the “right to die” and whether or not it is an inherent right in the Constitution. Those against assisted suicide say those who assist should be incarcerated for murder and medical professional should have their licenses revoked and integrity questioned. They believe this goes against the Due Process Clause in the Constitution, stating citizens should not be “deprived of life. liberty, or property.” Proponents of assisted suicide argue that Due Process protects their rights to personal choice and should be an option for those who are terminally ill and suffering. The novel (and upcoming movie) “Me Before You” by Jojo Moyes explores this debate.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a debated ethical topic in the science community. “Physician assisted suicide is the term used by the public and in the medical literature to describe the voluntary self administration of lethal medications prescribed by a physician expressly for the purpose of ending ones life” (Chin, Hedberg, Higginson, and Fleming). Physician assisted suicide is not a widely accepted topic, thus it is only legal in 5 states. There are many laws that are associated with PAS, describing what is and isn't allowed to happen between terminal patients and their doctors. Specifically, in Oregon they have the Death with dignity act, which allows PAS to be used in certain circumstances. “The law states that, in order to participate,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctors assisted suicide should be an available treatment option for doctors to perform per patient requests. The opposition view would say that the person shouldn’t end their life but for some cases it is extreme but they don’t want to take their life and therefore they’d rather have a professional help in their choice. However something you need to think about is that if some people just lost a family they may just want to join their family in heaven and they should have the right to choose that. I believe that they have the choice for their life. “Many respondents on both sides of the argument spoke of the importance of palliative care relieving pain and making the end of life comfortable and dignified” (Reinburg). Many doctors preform assisted…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics