Preview

Summary: The Importance Of Free Speech On College Campuses

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: The Importance Of Free Speech On College Campuses
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions addresses the students and faculty at Georgetown Law School about the importance of free speech on college campuses. The Attorney General effectively uses the rhetorical strategies of logos, by citing facts and logical arguments; ethos, by citing experts’ opinions and elevated grammar; and pathos, allusions and anecdotal evidence; to convince his audience of the oppression of free speech on college campuses by the school board and ultimately the government.

Initially Aristotle’s technique of logical appeal or logos is convincingly used in Sessions’ speech by intertwining specific authentic facts to prove his point that freedom of speech is jeopardized on American campuses. For
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court Case Of Tinker V. Des Moines
    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court Case Of Tinker V. Des Moines

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle's Artistic Proofs as Applied to the "Declaration of War" Speech by Franklin D. Roosevelt
    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aristotle's Artistic Proofs as Applied to the "Declaration of War" Speech by Franklin D. Roosevelt

    Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Silverglate Free Speech Summary
    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Silverglate Free Speech Summary

    Silvergate notes that limiting free speech would fall to the responsibility of college administrators who will undoubtedly over censor due to the broad harassment regulations the proposed bill contains. He supports this point by adding that the Individual Rights Foundation, FIRE already claims harassment as “the most abused tool to limit free speech.”…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary: The Influence Of First Amendments On College Campuses
    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary: The Influence Of First Amendments On College Campuses

    By definition, a speech code is any rule or regulation that limits, restricts, or bans speech beyond the strict legal limitations upon freedom of speech or press found in the legal definitions of harassment, slander, libel, and fighting words (First Amendment). There is not one real speech code that all public college campuses follow. The first amendment includes freedom of speech, but does not limit any speech codes on college campuses. The first amendment states that students have the freedom of speech unless there is "substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others". (First Amendment). The speech that is protected under the first amendment is very vague especially considering schools and campuses. Finding a set standard for what the speech codes for college campuses should be easier than it is now; there should be a set definition that lays out rules for speech on campuses.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Free Speech Is Flunking Out On College Campuses Summary
    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Free Speech Is Flunking Out On College Campuses Summary

    continues to explain that Texas Tech bans students to a freedom of speech zone which is only a gazebo that can hold no more than forty people. If a student would like to engage in any type of freedom of speech activities outside of this zone, then they must have approval six days before the activity (504). The fact that students are not permitted to speak their mind freely outside of the gazebo without permission is saddening. Higher authorities are limiting the thoughts of not only students, but also all people because of the fear that they will insult someone or they will speak out against their rules. Freedom of speech should not be limited to a certain zone with only a certain amount of students to hear it because the founding fathers did not intend for it be like this. They came from a country where they were not permitted to have their own opinion; therefore, they wanted the United States to allow freedom of speech whenever and wherever. Limiting speech is limiting diversity, knowledge, and opinion; moreover, censorship is not allowing the country to grow. Rampell continues to state “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders at Wesleyan and…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Citizens United Case
    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Citizens United Case

    Wu, T. (2010). The Future of Free Speech. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57 (13), B4-B5.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Speech Codes Threaten The Free Exchange Of Ideas On College Campuses
    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Speech Codes Threaten The Free Exchange Of Ideas On College Campuses

    In the debate over whether speech codes should be enforced or not on university campuses, the opponents conclude that university’s should not enforce a hate speech code because it impedes academic freedom. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that it is a university’s responsibility to enforce hate speech code for an equal education opportunity. In this essay, I will conclude that hate speech should be regulated by a code enforced by the university because of the protection it offers. In the article titled, “Speech Codes Threaten the Free Exchange of Ideas on College Campuses” Eugene Volokh concludes that colleges should enforce a speech code.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mizzou Free Speech
    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mizzou Free Speech

    In the article, Mizzou, Yale, and Free Speech, Nicholas Krsitof discusses today’s most sensitive issue: racism. His audience is the people of the United States so he is sure to pull out all of the most controversial issues. He carefully tip-toes around the subject of racism when he shifts the focus from racism and points his readers towards accepting all forms of diversity. He incorporates the need for acceptance of diversity and the increasing cry for the first amendment, also known as, freedom of speech. He attempts to cover every perspective in his article when he goes from the point of view of a liberal, a Christian, and even a transgender person. He argues that there is diversity so that we can challenge each other and in the words of Kristof, “Education is about stretching muscles.”…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Elements Of Rhetoric
    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rhetorical Elements Of Rhetoric

    On June 12, 2016 in Orlando, Florida, a terrorist attack took place at the Pulse Nightclub which claimed the lives of 49 Americans and injured 53 others. The incident is considered one of the deadliest mass shootings in the United States. Following the event, President Obama and GOP presidential nominee Trump gave speeches regarding the event. When presented with President Obama’s speech and candidate Trump’s speeches concerning the shooting, the audience is presented with two examples of how rhetoric can be used to persuade and achieve opposing goals. By examining the elements of rhetoric and how they are applied in these speeches, the viewer is shown how Aristotle’s teachings are still being applied over 2000 years later.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thought That We Hate
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thought That We Hate

    The subjects of concern are the brave judges belonging to the 20th Century who were the pillars that laid the foundation of the First Amendment that called for what has widely become lingo – freedom of speech – but which has also become largely distorted and diluted in its meaning, in its context, and in its essence. Lewis reminds us what this amendment in the Constitution truly entails – the restriction laid on the government, the banning of offensive speech on the government’s part, is the focal point of the argument that Lewis puts before his readers. His advocacy for the first amendment and his reminder comes at a likely time for reminders, when the campaigns elections are in full swing, and when the State has been suddenly taken as if by a thunderous storm of hate speech, offensive speech, and what is tantamount to straight up vulgarity. Lewis reminds his audiences and jogs our memories back to the draft in the Constitution that deal so strictly with the issue of offensive speech. A timely judgment on Lewis’ part, this kernel of concentrated thought hits the mark with acute precision and with an iron fist, and puts many a cheek to the red blush of shame, and guilt, and…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On Campus Research Paper
    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hate Speech On Campus Research Paper

    In the debate over censorship of hate speech on college campuses, the opponents conclude that colleges should censor hate speech on campus because minorities have the civil right to equal enjoyment of education, free of harassment. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that we should not censor hate speech on campus because students have a right to academic freedom. In this essay I will conclude that colleges should not censor hate speech.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why We Should Not Be Allowed On College Campuses
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why We Should Not Be Allowed On College Campuses

    Guns are a double-edged sword when it comes down to it. Guns provide many people the ability to feel safe and protected, while other guns are constant reminder that some freedoms are taken too far. Guns privileges are abused, misused, and mistreated. Young people glorify toting weapons like it’s a new fashion statement. Missing the fact, that what in reality is causing uproar and panic amongst everyone else. That is why I feel like guns should not be allowed on college campuses.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Speech Codes On College Campuses
    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Speech Codes On College Campuses

    Jon Katz, an American journalist and author, also argued: “Institutions that are supposed to be breeding grounds for original and innovative thought have embraced the forced re-ordering of moral conscience” (Katz). However, speech codes do not stifle freedom of speech. It merely adds to the exclusions of the first amendment in order to create a safe learning environment and equal opportunities for all. Speech codes, in no way, limit learning, in fact, they enhance learning…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On Campus
    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hate Speech On Campus

    Even though there has been a large increase in the number of hate speech codes in colleges and universities, the increase in the amount of hate speech incidents across the nation shows that these guidelines have be ineffective. Ben Wildavsky the author of “Rethinking Campus Speech Codes”, talks about how “campus wars over race and gender have hardly died down”, and that the “speech codes have done little to ease tension” (415). Hate speech codes attempt to create a safer more politically correct environment on college campuses by setting forth guidelines for students to follow, but they are failing miserably. The guidelines are so vague that “several major universities have been held unconstitutional”, for trying to write campus speech codes. For instance:
 In 1989, a federal judge overturned parts of the University of Michigan’s speech 
 code after a biopsychology graduate student said he feared the rules would prevent 
 him from discussing controversial theories about biological differences among the 
 sexes and races (Wildavsky 415). 
Making students follow the hate speech codes is a violation of their First Amendment which entitles…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment
    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    First Amendment

    Cited: Barnes, Robert. "Justices to Hear Landmark Free-Speech Case; Defiant Message Spurs Most Significant Student 1st Amendment Test in Decades." The Washington Post [Juneau] 13 Mar. 2007: 2. Print.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics