The play _Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare_ includes many references of superstitions and omens. These references played an important role in the development of the plot and characters. Shakespeare used elements such as weather, old beliefs, and people's visions to portray messages to the audience. Through the use of superstitions and omens, Shakespeare foreshadowed Caesar's death, exposed the changes in various characters, and allowed the characters' true intensions to reveal themselves through the misinterpretations of omens.
The superstitions and premonitions added by Shakespeare were used to foreshadow the death of Caesar. By doing this, Shakespeare to made it obvious to the audience that Caesar was going to die and there was nothing anybody could do about it. On the night before the Ides of March, there was a large thunderstorm that took place. The storm foreshadowed the assassination of Julius Caesar and it's negative repercussions. Shakespeare's audience treated the kings as the gods' representative on Earth. So when Casca and Cicero met on a Roman street. Casca points out:
"Either there is a civil strife in heaven,
Or else the world, too saucy with the gods,
Incenses them to send destruction." (1.3.11-13)
Casca's words leave an undertone that even the heavens are upset with the plans to murder Caesar. Because Caesar's death would break one of the human laws, this disturbed a natural law, resulting in a thunderstorm. Casca continues to point out to Cicero things he saw that were clearly omens:
"Against the Capitol I met a lion,
Who glared at me and went surly by,
Without annoying me…
And yesterday the bird of night did sit
Even at noon-day upon the marketplace,
Hooting and shrieking." (1.3.20-28)
Obviously these things don't just naturally happen, so they were put there by Shakespeare to foreshadow Caesar's assassination. Caesar's servant and wife didn't want him to leave on the day of his death. Caesar's wife, Calpurnia, had a bad dream that his statue was spewing blood and many Romans were bathing their hands in it. Similarly, Caesar's servant cautioned him from leaving his house:
"They would not have you stir forth today.
Plucking the entrails of an offering forth,
They could not find a heart within the beast." (2.2.38-40)
These two phenomena occurred on the same day, right after the night of the storm and Casca's strange visions, on the day of Caesar's death. Shakespeare strategically placed them to foreshadow an upcoming tragedy.
The use of superstitions and the supernatural shows the development and changes within the important characters throughout the play. Julius Caesar starts off the play being very superstitious and he allows these beliefs to dictate the way he makes choices. He makes this evident in his conversation with Antonius:
"Forget not in your speed, Antonius,
To touch Calpurnia, for our elders say
The barren, touched in this holy chase,
Shake off their sterile curse." (1.2.8-11)
Here, two friends speak to each other about a race that takes place on the Feast of the Lupercal. Caesar tells Antonius to touch Calpurnia because he believes it will make her able to bear children, giving attention to omens and superstitions. Unfortunately, Caesar eventually disregards omens and superstitions entirely leading to the day he dies. He believes he is stronger than the supernatural, as he says to his wife, Calpurnia:
No, Caesar shall not. Danger knows full well
That Caesar is more dangerous than he.
We are two lions littered in one day,
And I the elder and more terrible.
And Caesar shall go forth." (2.2.44-48)
In this quote by Caesar, he is expressing his disregard for the bad omens that everyone is experiencing, which pertain to him. As well, Caesar's words demonstrate his change in attitude. Earlier in the play, Caesar was less ambitious which caused him to pay more attention to what was occurring in his surroundings, such as superstitions. Shakespeare shows Cassius' change in attitude in a conversation between him and Casca:
"For my part, I have walked about the streets,
Submitting me unto the perilous night,
And, thus unbracèd, Casca, as you see,
Have bared my bosom to the thunder-stone.
And when the cross blue lightning seemed to open
The breast of heaven, I did present myself
Even in the aim and very flash of it." (1.3.47-53)
Cassius said this to Casca while the two conspirators were speaking about omens. The audience sees Cassius' dangerous and narcissistic attitudes reveal themselves by the way he tested and belittled superstitions, something that the people of that time took so seriously. Cassius ' attitude towards omens and superstitions completely changes. Cassius believes and allows superstitions to affect the way he thinks. This is demonstrated when he speaks to Messala in the 5th Act:
"You know that I held Epicurus strong
And his opinion. Now I change my mind,
And partly credit things that do presage." (5.1.76-78)
Cassius' words express his new belief in the supernatural and omens. It is possible to draw this change in belief towards superstitions, to a change in his attitude and decisions. This new belief, made him more cautious and realistic when entering the battle at Philippi, as opposed to his previous irrational fearlessness seen during the storm. In both characters, Julius Caesar and Caius Cassius, the audience sees, through Shakespeare's use of superstitions, a significant change in attitude.
In Julius Caesar, some of the most important superstitions and omens were miss-interpreted by the characters. This happened because either the receiver of the omen didn't like the message, or they didn't understand its purpose or it's relevance. When this happened, it dramatically enhanced the plot, as well as showed the characters' true intensions. This occurs on the night of the storm, when Cassius says:
"Now could I, Casca, name to thee a man
Most like this dreadful night" (1.3.73-74)
Instead of referring the storm to Caesar's imminent death and its repercussions, Cassius relates the storm to Caesar's powerful existence. If Cassius were able to decipher and accept the real message in the storm, he would have recognized his villainous plans. Perhaps, Caesar would not have been killed, and there would be no negative aftermath to his death. Cassius didn't want the storm to represent Caesar's death, nor did it even cross Cassius' mind that the storm might have to do with his plans. Cassius truly wanted to kill Caesar out of jealousy and nothing was going to get in his way, not even the natural order of things. Misinterpreting omens also occurs on the day of Caesar's death when Decius Brutus, comes to escort Caesar to the senate, he finds Caesar was unwilling to leave his house because Calpurnia had a bad dream. Decius Brutus, planning to kill Caesar, convinces him that the dream was miss-interpreted:
"This dream is all amiss interpreted.
It was a vision fair and fortunate"
Caesar believes his friend and goes to the senate house with Decius Brutus, which lead to his inevitable death. There were so many signs guiding Caesar not to go to work that day, some including: The soothsayer told Caesar to beware the Ides of March, and also the sacrificed animal without a heart. Caesar miss interpreted all of these things to be good signs or ignored them entirely, because he believed that he was going to be crowned king that day and his ambition got the better of him. Caesar didn't want to believe the signs were describing bad things to come because he didn't like the idea of that happening. These miss-interpretations eventually led to fatal errors and thus made the play Julius Caesar a tragedy.
In conclusion, Shakespeare's use of superstitions was very important to the play, Julius Caesar, because of the role they had in the play. The weather was used for foreshadowing Caesar's death and showing Cassius' initial attitudes towards the supernatural. The people's old beliefs were used by Shakespeare to show Caesar's change in beliefs and increase in ambition because he purposely translated the sign incorrectly as well as foreshadow his death. People's visions were put in the play by Shakespeare to foreshadow Caesar's death and the negative events to come afterwards, because they were miss translated by Caesar, it advanced the plot and eventually got him killed. Not only was the incorporation of supernatural things in Julius Caesar intriguing to the audience, it also served a functional purpose towards the overall play as a whole.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Akin to the Salem Witch Trials that took place in 1692 and 1693, the assassination of the great Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar appeared to be unreasonable or unjust to many of those that honor him. However, unlike the notorious Salem Witch Trials, it is clear that as light manifests itself upon the mysterious reasons in regards to why Julius Caesar was brutally murdered, it is made obvious that Julius Caesar may not have been quite the adored and honorable man that the Romans so hoped for. There was a side to the Julius Caesar that remained hidden by his graciousness and utterly generous facade. This side of the great and almighty Caesar would prove to convince and compel the very Senators that served below him, that Caesar must meet his rather “timely” demise.…
- 744 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar takes place in Ancient Rome, 44 BC, during this time period there was an assassination planned for Julius Caesar. Various rumors about this plan were circulating throughout Rome. Calphurnia, Caesar's wife, tries to explain to him that it is safer for him to stay home. Meanwhile, a conspirator, named Decius, combats her argument and tries to convince him to come to a senate meeting. Both Decuis and Calphurnia use several rhetorical devices to try and persuade Caesar to do what they wish.…
- 1062 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
It has come to my attention that you have had many signs given to you in the strangest of ways, hinting towards you not going to the capitol. The town’s soothsayer told you to beware of the Ides of March, which is the 15th of the month; the same time you’re to be “crowned” in front of the senate. I understand that the futures some of the soothsayers may predict are not always accurate, but Caesar you’ve always got to consider any possibilities, and keep his predictions in the back of your mind. Though you may not fully understand why he may have said that to you, you still can’t just brush off what he says.…
- 1029 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…
- 469 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
After a flood of strange events from the preceding night and her nightmares of Caesar’s murder, Calpurnia insists that Caesar heed to the Soothsayer’s prophecy to beware the ides of March. Calpurnia emphasized the grimness of the omens by using alliteration, parallelism, logical appeals, and a terrified tone. She interprets the comets lighting up the night sky seen as a prophecy of his death, reasoning that the heavens proclaim the death of only great men. She envisioned lustful, smiling Romans washing their hands in Caesar's blood. Though it failed to work because her language and tone did not suit Caesar’s way of thinking. Caesar firmly believed that while cowards imagine their death frequently, brave men die only once. Therefore Caesar thought that listening to his wife and staying back was the act of a coward, which he never wanted to consider himself to be. Engulfed by his stubborn pride, Caesar maintains that he will not stay home out of fear. Despite failing to convince Caesar with logic, Calpurnia tries again using an emotional approach by desperately begging him on her knees and requesting him to send Antony to the Senate in his place. Caesar relents and agrees not to go to the Senate to ease Calpurnia’s worry, not because of her argument.…
- 729 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…
- 154 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
drastic challenges and measures of day to day life in arranged relationships. It also focues…
- 380 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Even in his absence or death, the manner in which characters address Caesar, describe him, and act in his presence, reveals the authority and influence he has over people's lives. From the first scene, Caesar is presented as victorious, having vanquished his rival, Pompey, and as an extremely popular figure among the people, with the commoners even defying authorities to celebrate his victory. As the play continues into scene ii, Caesar appears before the crowds as a modern-day pop-star, surrounded by a trail of subservient entourage. Casca and Antony display complete submission to Caesar, with the latter declaring that 'when Caesar says Do this! It is done' . In Caesar's absence, fellow patricians, Brutus and Cassius, describe him as 'mighty Caesar', a man who 'has now become a God', and strides in the world 'as a Colossus' . It is therefore evident that his close subordinates are jealously affected by his power, an effect which will later germinate into conspiracy. Even after his assassination, Caesar's ghost continues the task of perpetuating the fear of his everlasting power on those he influenced. Caesar holds enough power over his subjects that he is capable of influencing them continually, in his life and…
- 1643 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Antony uses figurative language when he says, “My heart is in the coffin there was Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me (pg. 123).” Antony uses this metaphor to portray to the citizens of Rome, the sadness and mourning that has impacted him personally due to the murder of Caesar. And because the Romans see and feel Antony’s sadness it will rub off on them and truly make them question the actions of Brutus and the conspirators. The use of this metaphor at the end of Antony’s speech illuminates the conflict between the Romans and Brutus.…
- 467 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
|(from Cassius) urging him to |Caesar agrees to stay home for her sake, |then waits in the street|soothsayer, who |…
- 1406 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Cicero states “Men may construe things after their fashion,” (Act I Scene iii, Page 37, Lines 34–35) Often, misperception and misreading can drastically affect the outcome of people in their lives. Misperception and misreading not only affects the characters in Julius Caesar, it also affects everybody’s decisions in their day-to-day lives. In much of Shakespeare’s tragedy, the reader witnesses the idea of misperception and misreading of omens and events as they occur throughout the book. It is by his own misperception that Brutus is manipulated, and it is because of Decius Brutus’s misreading of Calpurnia’s dream that Caesar is killed later that day. Also, it is due to misperceptions the citizens of Rome are so easily swayed by Antony’s speech in the marketplace and Cassius commits suicide. Misperceptions and misreadings both shape and carry the plot throughout the book and are the main theme in it.…
- 960 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
From the opening scene of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare introduces conflict. Flavius and Murellus introduce Caesar as a contentious personality, as they rebuke the “mechanicals” who “make holidays to see Caesar” and “rejoice his triumph”. The Tribunes are unhappy with these celebrations as shown through the contrast in tone when Murellus adresses the “Mechanicals” with “You blocks, You stones, you worse than senseless things!” demonstrating the conflicting perspectives within the social classes. The Tribunes believe that Caesar's “growing feathers” need to be “Pluck's” as they are concerned that with his growing power they will be kept in “servile fearfulness”. Shakespeare conveys their anger at the fickleness of the “Mechanicals”, through the use of imperatives such as “answer me directly” and “be gone!'...” as they rebuke their “ingratitude” to Pompey. This shows the dominance of the Tribunes and…
- 1450 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…
- 543 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In act two scene two, Caesar receives word that the priests, upon performing a sacrifice, cannot find the sacrificed beast's heart. Caesar does not interpret this the way he should, which is to stay in his house away from threats, but instead thinks that “the gods do this in shame of cowardice.” Shortly afterward, Caesar reveals that wife Calphurnia saw his statue, “which, like a fountain with a hundred spouts, did run pure blood.” Caesar, under the sway of Decius, again misinterprets this bad omen to mean that his “statue spouting blood in so many pipes, in which so many smiling Romans bathed, signifies that from you great Rome shall suck reviving blood.” As Caesar is full of pride, he is constantly looking for signs of his superiority, and when Decius gives this interpretation, Caesar laps it up without a second thought. Caesar, who thinks himself immune to flattery, can be so easily flattered by anything that pertains to his pride. However, these mistakes are not enough to damn him. In the end, Caesar makes a fatal mistake by directly insulting the gods with the words “Hence! Wilt thou lift up Olympus?” Caesar implies that he is equal to the Olympians, and they, to teach him a lesson, send the senators to stab him. By including this line, Shakespeare provides…
- 2477 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In March 1998, an Oregon woman dying of breast cancer asked her physician to prescribe a drug that would allow her to end her life. The doctor agreed. Later in the month she took the medication. With that action, she became the first person in the united state to commit suicide with the help of a doctor-legally. This has come to be known as “physician-assist suicide,” which has come to be one of the most controversial topics, right up there with the topic of abortion. Arguments as to why it should be legal are terminally ill patients should have the ability to control their own lives and make their own decisions, is it morally right for a doctor to assist in suicide, and the pros and cons of assisted suicide.…
- 628 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays