Preview

Supremacy of Eu Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supremacy of Eu Law
Supremacy/ Primacy of European Union Law

Introduction:
State sovereignty and supremacy of European Union law are traditionally seen as fundamentally opposite in nature. The rights of states to deal with national issues internally, in compliance with national law, versus the obligation on states to subordinate national law to Community law.
Where it is contained:
Historically the EEC treaty contained no provision dealing with the concept of supremacy of Community law over the national law of member states. In fact, treaties were generally silent as to the nature of the relationship between EU law and national law except for a general obligation contained in article 4 (3) TEU which states:-
“‘Pursuant to the principle of sincere cooperation, the Union and the Member States shall, in full mutual respect, assist each other in carrying out tasks which flow from the Treaties.
The Member States shall take any appropriate measure, general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of the Treaties or resulting from the acts of the institutions of the Union.
The Member States shall facilitate the achievement of the Union's tasks and refrain from any measure which could jeopardise the attainment of the Union's objectives.’
The concept of Supremacy is now, however, contained in declaration 17 within the Treaty of Lisbon. The declaration is not a formal provision and has no binding basis within the treaty due to the dropping of the proposed provision at the behest of the European Council in 2007, largely due to the controversial reception by member states of the ambiguous provision. Declaration 17 provides that:
“In accordance with well settled case law of the court of justice, the treaties and law adopted by the union on the basis of treaties have primacy over the law of Member States, under conditions laid down by the said case law”
Development of concept:
Since no formal provision was contained within the treaties concerning the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1996 Apush Exam

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The unconditional adherence of the United Stated to the charter of the League of Nations…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 Essay Example

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Establishes clear obligations for member countries to ensure that their legal framework is in line with the provisions of the Convention’…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Micheal Dougan in “When worlds collide: competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy” opined that the principle of supremacy has been used as a tool to exclude national law which is inconsistent with EU law.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tribunals and Court System

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3) European Law - This is law made by the European Union. The UK joined the EU on 1st January 1978. The European Law takes precedence over UK statute law.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Enforcement of Eu Law

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When the EC makes a law it is up to the individual state to implement the legislation. An example of EU law which has been passed which has been adopted in the UK is that of the directive 75/117 which states that men and women should receive equal pay. The UK government adopted this directive with the 1975 Sex discrimination Act.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To some extent the EU has become a superstate due to federalist features that combine the member states of the European Union closer together. For Eurosceptic British who oppose the further integration between the states have defined the EU’s superstate to be a huge, centralized Brussels Bureaucracy limiting the sovereign authority of member states. This can be controversial as those in favour of the EU would prefer to grant some powers to a central body as they can achieve benefits in return for example the single market.…

    • 2737 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History of NATO

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They agreed upon that NATO member being attacked are considered as attacks against them all. Consequently they agreed that, in case of such an attack, each of them will do whatever it takes to restore and maintain the security.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another argument that shows there is conflict between judges and government minsters is that EU law is superior to British made law. This means that any government legislation that does not coincide with EU law, will not stand up in the European Court, so…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government

    • 2602 Words
    • 11 Pages

    If the European government decide on a law then the other countries have to follow. For example: no guns; this means that the UK cannot use guns.…

    • 2602 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The European Communities Act 1972 has been enacted by the parliament and it’s sought to bring a voluntary end to parliamentary sovereignty or at least render it as secondary. This has made the EU law a definitive supremacy as the parliament can’t make any laws that are in way of the current EU law. This is shown in the case of Costa , where the European Court of Justice shows supremacy over the member states. On the other hand the Factortame i case shows that the parliament still has control over its…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first case where the Court made a statement on the nature of European law is the famous case of Van Gend en Loos dealing with the principle of direct effect of EC Treaty provisions and the degree to which individuals can rely on such terms to challenge measures of national law. It was in a second important case, two years later, however, that the ECJ expanded on its constitutional theory of the Community, declaring again that the states had created a sovereign Community by limiting their own sovereign rights. The case was Costa v Enel, the Court basically decided that community law had supremacy over national law. To this day the judgement is the bedrock of the importance of Community law in all Member States of the European Union. Without this decision Community law would have remained merely international law. Not until the doctrine of supremacy did Community law become truly ‘supranational’ as intended in the European treaties. It was in Bulmer v Bollinger that Lord Denning stated:…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are few cases that rival Factortame in being concurrently substantively clear and decisive, and perplexing as to its full impact. The scope of the change to the UK constitution that has been instigated by it and other European Court of Justice decisions has been conceptualised as ranging from a ‘legal evolution’ to ‘revolution’. Although some theories are more convincing than others, each faces its own weaknesses. However, notwithstanding the conclusion of this particular speculative debate, the processes of European integration has undoubtedly quickened the pace at which UK Parliament and courts as part of a globalised world have had to squarely confront these constitutional changes, especially the departure from Parliament’s stronghold over the constitution. A Diceyan view of the UK constitution is no longer compatible with the current relationship between UK and EU law. It was decided in Factortame and confirmed in Equal Opportunities Commission, that the implications of the European Communities Act 1972 s.2(4) is that EU law has supremacy in the case of clashes between EU and national laws. Within the orthodox view that Parliament is absolutely sovereign, inconsistencies between Acts of Parliament are to be dealt with by applying the doctrine of explicit or implied repeal to give effect to the later Act which is simply another illustration of how no Parliament can bind its successors. It would never have been open to national courts to declare provisions within primary statute incompatible with EC law either temporarily or permanently as it is today. However, so long as UK remains a part of the EU, EU law will prevail when inconsistencies arise and any derogation from this position will have to be done expressly and unequivocally. Therefore, even if the current position of Parliamentary sovereignty cannot clearly be defined, Factortame and EOC alone emphasise the unworkability of a Diceyan view of Parliamentary sovereignty in an European context. A…

    • 1513 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Has it been easy for Member States in the European Union to give up sovereignty and prerogative powers to the Union itself? The issues, both in a paractoical and theoretical sense, give rise to the supremacy of the European Union as a key fundanmental principle. This reflects the issue of relation between the national law and the EU itself. This matter becomes more intriguing in the new context as the enlargement gives rise to a process of ratfication of the European Constitution.…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays