Preview

Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons
The essential purpose behind lifetime designation of our Supreme Court is to guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. And also to protect our Supreme Judges from political pressure. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime.
Having our Supreme Court Justice serving on the bench for life can have pros and cons. Although, most of our fellows americans seem to have more drawbacks about our Supreme Court of Justice life tenure position. With this in mind, let me first mention the pros
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Muller Vs. Oregon: Impact On Supreme Court History
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Muller Vs. Oregon: Impact On Supreme Court History

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court
    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court

    The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Expand Judicial Power in 1937
    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page

    Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Expand Judicial Power in 1937

    At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A More Perfect Constitution Summary
    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A More Perfect Constitution Summary

    Although having increased slots in the Supreme Court would boost the potential for diversity, the amendment fails to cause any meaningful change in the actual diversity of the Court. Additionally, allowing for the possibility of a deadlocked Supreme Court would greatly increase the power of the appellate court. This power increase could have some negative side effects, as appointments to the appellate court do not have the same scrutiny as Supreme Court appointments. Sabato’s third amendment has too many issues to be applied to the Constitution, striking a strong contrast to his fourth amendment. Sabato’s final amendment, in my opinion, would bring a much-needed improvement to the federal courts. Naturally, these judges need to have a salary that covers their living expenses, as requiring judges to ask for raises from Congress can allow for serious biases or manipulation to enter play. This amendment also lacks any meaningful downsides, as its worst drawback is simply increasing spending by the federal government. Overall, while two of Sabato’s amendments would work well, the second and third would bring many issues and need more…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices
    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did John Marshall Improve The Power Of The Federal Courts?
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did John Marshall Improve The Power Of The Federal Courts?

    John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801, John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803), Fletcher v. Peck (1809), and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) laid the foundation for what we know today as a powerful judicial branch.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper
    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Are Texas Appointed Judges
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Are Texas Appointed Judges

    “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Examples Of Term Limits Of Supreme Court Justices
    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Examples Of Term Limits Of Supreme Court Justices

    Term Limits for the Supreme Court Justices Intro Paragraph Imagine one of the highest ranked government officials having a memory loss disease such as Alzheimer’s. One-in-nine Americans over 65 has Alzheimer’s disease. Currently, seven out of the eight Supreme Court Justices is over the age of 65. Supreme Court justices serve a life-long term according to the Constitution, but there should be a term limit.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    First, a term limit may hurt the judicial independence. One of the best arguments against term limits is that life tenure frees justices from political pressure. Justices are not elected officials, and it would be gratifying for them to not feel the pressure of ordinary politics. Also, we do not want the justices to worry about their life after their Supreme Court career is over. The justices may become worried about how they vote on specific cases if they are trying to gain the respect of public opinion. Second, the Supreme Courts validity might be jeopardized by shortening the term limits. Having life tenure allows the justices to interpret the law exactly the way they see fit. People support the Supreme Court even in disagreements because they believe they are involved in something greater than ordinary politics (Ringhand np). Third, term limits could not eliminate all aspects of political gamesmanship. The Senate would still have the power to refuse to act on a nomination or vote down a nominee they find…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits

    The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Life Tenure

    Because the life tenure for a Supreme Court Justice will protect them from making biased or “polarised” decisions, the life tenure should remain as it has been for over two hundred years. Just in the past year, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito, who are all more conservative, have all voted on certain cases with more liberal justices. Andrew Martin and Kevin Quinn, who have researched the decisions of justices, have discovered that several justices change their opinions over time, something that wouldn’t happen so…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Candidate Essay
    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Candidate Essay

    We need Justices in the courts to put their jobs and the needs of the people before themselves and any of their personal biases. How could a Justice rule accurately to what the people need and what is fair if they do not listen to what is being needed or even outright reject something only on the grounds that their personal beliefs deem it wrong? If a Justice was allowed to do this, black rights would never have been established, the rights for gays to get married would never have passed and women may have never been able to vote or be paid accordingly. Because of issues such as these, we need someone who puts their duties before all…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court of the United States and U.s. Supreme Court
    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Supreme Court of the United States and U.s. Supreme Court

    The judge listens to both sides of the case to make a recommendation to the jury of what outcome to decide.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics