Preview

Supreme Court Letter

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
875 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Letter
Emily de Witte
12 Cecil Walden ridge
Kanata, ON, K2K 3C6
(613) 852­3246
Emily@dewitte.ca

October 15, 2014
Supreme Court of Canada
301 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0J1 Dear Your Honour,
The argument over assisted suicide began with Sue Rodriguez in 1993. Rodriguez argued that section 241 of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms violates her constitutional rights to life, liberty and security of the person.
The Supreme Court ruled on wether to legalize assisted suicide or not and with a 5­4 decision, assisted suicide remained illegal. The Supreme Court refused to hear subsequent cases about this matter, until now. Gloria Taylor represented by the BC Civil Liberties Association raised the issue once again a few years ago. She interpreted
Section 7 as giving her control over her body and the decision she makes about the manner of her death. I believe the reasoning for the debate on wether to legalize assisted suicide or not stems from individual interpretation of the charter. In my opinion, the law’s against assisted suicide should remain the same, assisted suicide being illegal.
Supposed safeguards are illusory. No matter how many protocols and guidelines would be made, laws will never be able to sufficiently ensure protection of vulnerable individuals. Inadequate procedures allows more probability for and easier abuse of the vulnerable. Legalizing assisted suicide will lead to people who are not terminally ill will want to end their life through assisted suicide. In Oregon, the number of patients requesting assisted suicide has significantly increased; however the number of patients sent for psychiatric testing has decreased. If patients are not being sent for diagnostics, they could very well not be in the right state of mind to make the life altering decision of ending their own life. In 2005, over 500 Dutch citizens were killed without their consent. They were given no choice in ending their own life or did not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    ENG 111 Final Paper

    • 3005 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In today 's society one of the most controversial issues is physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. Many feel as though it is wrong, regardless of their health condition to ask their health care provider to end their life. Others feel it is their right to be able to choose how and when they die. For those who believe physician-assisted suicide should be their choice, they feel it should be legal because: they don 't want to go through the suffering caused by the life-threatening illness, they fear the loss of their independence, becoming a burden to their family and friends, and the fear of dying alone.…

    • 3005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Weeds vs. Flowers

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Rosenfeld, Barry. “Assisted Suicide and the Right to Die: The Interface of Social Science, Public…

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia, often referred to as mercy killing, easy death, or right to die, generates strong feelings both pro and con as proponents of each side passionately argue their ideological stance. The broader concept is often missed with the attention placed on the narrow view of physician-assisted suicide. Many have little or no tolerance or understanding of the patient’s position feeling there is no quality of life in their present circumstance or condition and as such, they have a personal choice or entitlement to end their life or have someone else assist them in ending it in order to cease their own personal, unbearable, suffering and/or pain. Currently, this type of practice within these United States is deemed unacceptable and unlawful except within the states of Oregon, Washington, and Montana (Marker,…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals stated in its 1996 Opinion from Compassion in Dying v. Washington :…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However a Physician assisting with an individual’s wishes to accelerate death is to kill a patient. The Court compared it to someone blinded by the sun and running over an individual resulting in their death would be manslaughter, however purposely running over that individual would warrant murder. In addition the court ruled that a patient on life support wishing to end such measures was protecting their “common law rights” and letting them die compared to that of killing the patient. The Courts conclusory statements stated that the difference between a Physician-assisted suicide and removing life saving measures to those terminally ill is “irrational”. The Court added that anyone can refuse medical treatment but everyone is prohibited from any type of Physician-assisted suicide in an attempt to preserve human life. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor agreed with the Court’s decision in that there was not “A right to commit suicide” or a “Right to die”. She stated that there was not a constitutional conflict, and that the State had an interest in preserving human life and not allowing competent individuals the right to control their believed “imminent death”. She also added that a patient is able to receive and use pain relieving drugs from one’s doctor to alleviate pain and suffering. Justice John Paul Stevens…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 6, 1996 the case reached the Supreme Court. Washington State challenged the existing ban on assisted suicide under the equal protection clause of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. The court noted that, under present law, a dying patient on…

    • 612 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The right to assisted suicide is an important topic that concerns people all around the United…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a patient has a terminal illness and seeks results of physician-assisted suicide, the patient values the quality of life and not the quantity. According to, the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, "No State shall... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." (Stokely, Anne. Points of View: Assisted Suicide. 3/1/2016, p6-6. 1p). Therefore, the pros of physician-assisted suicide are; the patient can die with dignity, the patient along with relatives no longer must suffer, and health care costs for the patient are reduced. Authorizing physician-assisted suicide would make it simpler to direct its practice and shield against misuse. To…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree that the right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid any unnecessary excruciating pain seems as though it should be a basic human right. To have someone go through more suffering than absolutely necessary seems as though it would fall under the description of an inhumane act, and frankly an injustice against the basic human right of bodily autonomy and integrity. Due to these almost undeniable arguments, physician assisted suicide, in many cases, is seen as a basic human right that we need to be granted access to. Activists argue that it is simply an additional choice that we will be able to make, and that it will surely never be pushed onto anybody or used sinisterly (Maynard 2014). Although this claim is something that we cannot be entirely sure of, as I have continued to research the pros and cons behind physician assisted suicide, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases it truly does seem that the legalization of physician assisted suicide is the best option for everyone involved. It is a means to cease any unnecessary suffering that a person may be going though, and provides a sense of comfort for them during a time in their lives where they are not given many choices besides to deal with what they are going through and try to survive. Additionally, with many of the extreme medical advancements of the 20t century, our goals have been clouded by the quest to…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A state’s prohibition on assisted suicide, like all homicide laws, advances this interest. The Supreme Court concluded that the state of Washington had the right to decline to make judgments about the quality of life that a particular individual may enjoy, and the state could certainly conclude that all persons’ lives, from beginning to end, regardless of physical or mental condition, deserve full protection of the law.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The debate on assisted suicide in Canada is very controversial among groups who believe that these laws are taking away patient’s right to make a decision about their life while suffering from severe pain or a “right to die”. An example of assisted suicide is the case of Sue Rodriguez, where she was suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that was leading to total loss of physical control and dependence on a respirator. She wanted to maintain as much control over her own dying and death as possible and this is why she applied in Supreme Court to get permission for assisted suicide (Sneddon, 2006). But the Supreme Court rejected her request and ignored the fact that this prohibition discriminates against those who can not commit suicide without assistance and they are prevented by law from doing something that physically able are permitted to do. These laws might serve the goal of equality of autonomy but on the other side comes at the rate of being unfair. Such regulations prohibit the rights of competent vulnerable, disabled, and terminally ill people who are well aware of their situation that they will never get back to their healthy life and request to end life. From moral perspective, they face injustice by not getting the right to control their life. Making assisted suicide legalized will provide them justice and they will…

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    In recent years, assisted suicide has made a bigger appearance than ever. With medicine advancing, this topic has conjured more controversy than ever, making it difficult to ignore. Per the Webster dictionary, assisted suicide is defined as “suicide with help from another person (such as a doctor) to end suffering from severe physical illness.” Assisted suicide contains many disputable sides; including the view of it being a moral dilemma, and the opposing view to have the right to die with dignity and humanely.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted suicide and its relation to the Due Process Clause was brought into question by the court decision of Washington v. Glucksberg, a case that argued the ban on assisted suicide was unconstitutional. The verdict said the right to assist in suicide is not a protected liberty in the Constitution because it would go against the innate government interest to protect life; thus it is not a “fundamental” right (Justia). Courts have to interpret the Due Process clause and determine what constitutes as assistance and define what the right to liberty include (Waimberg). Those against assisted suicide, believe it is humane to…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    L's sought issue could not be resolved for the following reasons: (a) the sanctity of life was a fundamental principle of common law. There was no self-evident reason why it should give way to the values of autonomy or dignity; (b) there was no right to commit suicide; s.1 of the 1961 Act merely conferred immunity from the criminal process for those who actually committed suicide; (c) it was not appropriate for the court to fashion a defence of necessity in such a complex and controversial field, it was a matter for Parliament, Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] A.C. 789 considered; (d) A question was raised of how the courts could develop a…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was argued in October 5, 2005 and the supreme court decide on January 17, 2006. In the court case of Gonzales v. Oregon, Oregon physicians would prescribe patients with drugs that would terminally kill them, if the patients would like to do so. The court case of Gonzalez v. Oregon resolves a problem between the states death with the dignity act (DWDA) and the attorneys general understanding of the federal drug statue. Not only that but Oregon is the only state that has an assisted suicide law. The assisted suicide law was passed in Oregon in 1994, the justice department, under attorney general Janet Reno, was determined that the law did not violate the CSA. However, in 2001, attorney John Ashcroft improved the law by banning assisted suicide, but allowing physicians to be taught how to assist…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays