Preview

Survey of Law Final Study Guide

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6041 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Survey of Law Final Study Guide
Which of the following statements concerning the severance of parties charged with a criminal offense is incorrect?
Answer: A trial judge has broad discretion to deny a motion for severance even when counsel demonstrate that two defendants will present conflicting and irreconcilable defenses.

Which of the following statements is correct?
Answer: Most states have now adopted liberal rules allowing pretrial discovery in criminal cases.

Which of the following is not a component of a pretrial process? Answer: sentencing of the defendant

The singling out of an individual for prosecution based on that person’s race of religion is known as selective prosecution.

Disruptive courtroom behavior by defendants, witnesses, and spectators is most likely to be encountered in political trials where there may be support for the cause the defendants claim represents.

False, Once a physician offered by the prosecution as an expert witness testifies to his or her qualifications, cross-examination as to those qualifications by the defense is not permitted.

A skip tracer is one who seeks out absconding defendants to assist sureties who have posted bonds guaranteeing a defendants appearance before the court.

If, after deliberating for a considerable time, a jury reports that it is deadlocked, the trial judge may do any of the following except:
Answer: direct the jury to render “guilty” or “not guilty” within a specified short period of time.

In Baston v. Kentucky (1986), the Supreme Court held that a prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to exclude African-Americans from a jury trying an African-American defendants was ground for the defendant to claim discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

If the prosecution offered in evidence a relevant, but unsigned, statement purportedly made by a defense witness, the defense counsel would ordinarily object on the ground of the best evidence rule.

True, the Eighth

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Law Midterm Studyguide

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Citizens Insurance v. Parsons was an 1881 decision, which established the test to determine governmental jurisdiction. The constitutional issue in this case concerned the validity of the Ontario Fire Insurance Policy Act. Parsons owned a hardware store in Orangeville, which was destroyed by fire one evening. Insured by Citizens Insurance, Parsons asked the company to cover him for his loss. Citizens Insurance refused to pay out on the basis that Parsons failed to comply with the conditions that had been written into the insurance contract. Parsons argued that the conditions failed to comply with provisions in the Ontario Fire Insurance Policy Act. Citizens Insurance argued that the Ontario law is invalid, as it imposes a contract with insurance companies – an aspect of trade and commerce that falls to the jurisdiction of the federal government. Parsons, however, argued that this was an issue of civil and property rights. This case went to trial, and eventually went to the JCPC, who acknowledged that there was a contradiction between S. 91(2) and S. 93(13). The JCPC then decided that although there was a possibility for overlap, there should be some way of determining which level of government has jurisdiction over what subject matter. This lead to the creation of the Parson’s Test. In the Parsons Test, you must consider if the dispute falls within one of the jurisdictions in Section 92 of the provinces. If the answer is no, then the jurisdiction automatically falls to the federal government. If the answer is yes, does it also fall under the power of Section 91? If the answer is no, then it is a provincial area of jurisdiction. However, if the answer is yes to both questions, then the courts must reconcile the constitution in some way as to figure out which level of government has responsibility for jurisdiction.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EXTRA CREDIT License Plate – VIAGRA Wife’s Name – Edna Car Color – Sunset Orange EXTRA CREDIT License Plate – VIAGRA Wife’s Name – Edna Car Color – Sunset Orange BLAW 200 – Study Guide Fall 2011 Strongest Laws (1) Weakest Laws (13) Strongest Laws (1) Weakest Laws (13) Deans List #1 – Sources of Law (pg.4) 1. Constitutions (+Charters) 2. Statute (+Ordinances) 3.…

    • 18216 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "It must be a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt." (515 S Ct. 506 (1995)…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    So both cases clarified when exactly the prosecutors are permitted to remove a potential juror for cause in a capital punishment case.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have spoken to one of your workers by the name of Enjolie and the problem I'm having with this judge is that there's a conflict of interest .He handled a case involving a friend of mine and I had to take out a restraining order against her husband. Their names are Debra Webb and William Webb. her husband and the judge our good friends they golf together and do business together as well . I was told by her husband William that I would never get my children back. William Webbs's wife Deborah Webb has made a a complaint with this board as well.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is an introductory course, prerequisite to further studies in law. The course begins with a discussion of the nature and sources of law and an examination of the court system in Canada, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and a survey of the more important aspects of the law of torts. The course then concentrates on the legal requirements for the formation of a valid contract. Other major contract law topics include interpretation, privity, discharge, breach, and special types of contracts. Selected cases will be examined. This course, including all communications with the instructor, does not constitute legal advice, but academic information only. If you require legal advice to rely upon, you should retain a lawyer.…

    • 3599 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The sixth step is jury deliberations and verdict. This step is to remind the jurors of the laws. Each juror is to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty on each charge. There may be only one charge, but there can be more. If there is five charges against the defendant then the jurors have to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty on each charge. They all have to explain why or why not they feel the defendant is guilty on each charge.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Twelve jurors are given the job, by the judge, of deciding whether a teenage boy is innocent or guilty of killing his father. They must separate the facts from the fancy and provide a verdict of guilty if there is no reasonable doubt to the claims, or non-guilty if there is reasonable doubt. The decision must be unanimous. The charge against the defendant is Murder in the first degree – premeditated homicide (death sentence).…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 2 1 Assignment

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the court should uphold the supervisor’s decision. One of the reasons why I believe this is because the worker was not fired, if was fired then would be different situation. But because was laid off the court should uphold the supervisor’s decision. The given layoff was not a punishment of an action, it was more due to financial action. There is no sign showing that the employee, Fortin would or would not have been laid off irrespective of Fortin’s past history. This is why I believe that the court should uphold on the supervisor’s decision instead of overriding the supervisor’s decision.…

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asdasdasd

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (8) Proceeding to decide whether or not to keep a minor in custody is a detention…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I'm not sure what background information you are supposed to know on this. Certainly any discord among the jurors makes tension. You need a collective jury to to hand down a verdict. These jurors are hot, tired, and upset. A group will naturally look favourably to strong evidence that will end the trial. Any discord could convince other jurors to change their mind and shift the group dynamics.…

    • 5854 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification CJA 344 October 6, 2014 Johnny Cotton Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case moves to the U.S. Supreme court where we read about Justice Blackmun and his thoughts on gender- based peremptory challenges and how they violate the Equal Protection Clause.( cite text- p 56) peremptory challenges- “ in most states, attorneys are allowed to reject a minimum number of potential jurors without giving a reason.” This is a concept that takes into consideration a lawyers, gut reaction to whether a juror says anything, yeah or nay, that would indicate some sort of bias. He speaks of the fact that women were excluded from jury service in many states, despite the fact that they attained suffrage, with the ratification, of the 19th amendment in 1920. He further explains that, “although the racial discriminations have not been identical to gender discriminations, they both share a history of exclusion.” And the community is harmed with both of these issues. He then cites the Batson vs. Kentucky (1986), where the Supreme Court decided that lawyers are not allowed to use peremptory challenges to strike jurors just because of their race. So now the issue becomes, can that be extended to include gender as well as race? Blackmun’s argument is that, with race, “the core guarantee of equal protection, ensuring citizens that their state will not discriminate…”…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jury nullification is a jury that believes that a defendant is guilty of charges but on his or her own reason decide a…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics