Preview

Susan Jocoby: The First Amendment and Censorship

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Susan Jocoby: The First Amendment and Censorship
Jacoby then argues that pornography can hardly be deemed more offensive than Nazism, which is also protected by the First Amendment.
Next, Jacoby takes on the argument that the First Amendment is refuted by kiddie porn by submitting that kiddie porn is an issue of child abuse, not the First Amendment. Also, she counters the argument made by feminists that censorship of pornography is more sensible than other forms of censorship, by pointing out that some nude depictions are attractive to some women and offensive to others. In fact, she says, if feminists censor girlie magazines, they will be unintentionally aiding opponents of their own movement to censor discussion of abortion, rape, etc.
She says that feminists, like other potential censors, want to use the power of the state to achieve their ideal society, abandoning the democratic process. This desire, she argues, is taking responsibility from individuals and giving them to institutions. In her opinion, in the case of keeping young people from equating sex and violence, parents should be responsible, not the government.
Margaret Atwood’s essay “Pornography” deals with the difference between erotic and violent pornography. While at an international writers conference in Finland, Atwood gives a brief dissertation on what she perceived to be a link between political repression and pornography. Her opinion was not well received, and she was confronted by male journalists who asserted that she is a prude. She became heated, but was relieved when she found out that her idea of pornography and their idea of pornography are completely different. In Finland, pornography comprises of graphic depictions of whores. To Atwood, pornography means depictions of violent sexual acts, such as rape.

Ans1) Susan Jacoby was a journalist since the age of seventeen and she is well known for her feminist writings. Susan Jacoby was referred as a “First Amendment junkie” by some other women for her personal views concerning

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    He looks at restrictions on sexually explicit literature as violating the first amendment and the Modern First Amendment theories, and citing examples of Warren and William Brennan, and states that the obscenity law is ignored or the state…

    • 2333 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Susan Jacobs essay "A first amendment junkie" she discusses the fact that porn is the worst type of freedom of speech. It is insulting to women to have to walk pass porn shops, perhaps she means strip clubs ect. She says that it is worst then child porn. truthfully anyone most be most be out of her mind to say that porn is worst then child porn or to compare it to a child working in the minds. Who ever believes that needs a reality check in facts.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though there was a lot of controversy encompassing the Flynt case, from extreme right-wingers to the general public, the U.S. Supreme Courts ruled that Larry Flynt had the right to freedom of speech through the medium of his magazine. Radical feminist, Catherine MacKinnon went as far to say that it was the libertarians fault, placing the needs of freedom of speech over woman’s well-being. She argued that pornography encroached on women’s freedom and that pornography had nothing to do with freedom of speech. To those that are on a more neutral ground with the subject, when asked if woman are subordinated or harmed in some way do to pornography, and if men are sexually violent, those neutral parties would most likely say no. Many people look and read magazines like Hustler and Playboy for entertainment value. Some may even say that they have learned a great deal about sex by reading them, often because their own parents were too embarrassed to talk to them about sex at a younger age.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship has always been a hot topic in society. The censorship of today is debated just as it was one hundred years ago. Back then, the author of “The Atlantic Monthly” clearly demonstrated that scenes inappropriate from some should not be freely publicized, and from the censorship seen in today’s society, it is clear that he has a valid point.…

    • 337 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Censorship a Personal View,” Judy Blume connects the consequences academic censorship has on young adults with her own experiences. She recalled how censoring had increased dramatically, causing activists to protest in multiple education centers. Blume believes banning books from classrooms can decrease learning in real life situations. She recounted an experience with her own book being banned from children because it contained “explicit content”. Blume adds, she will continue to write to give students the right to books she was denied due to censorship.…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In "A First Amendment Junkie" Susan Jacoby argues that censoring pornography goes against the First Amendment. She believes that the First Amendment should be absolutely interpreted. She states that people will never be able to agree on what should be censored. She points out that censoring pornography will lead to censorship of other topics that need to be discussed and brought to attention in American society. She believes that pornography cannot even be defined as to what is “obscene” or what “art is”, and for that reason it can’t be censored…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    New York is decades old, but nevertheless it presents controversy surrounding issues of free speech that still resonate today (390 U.S. 62, L. Ed. 2d 195, 88 S. Ct. 1274). The State of New York prosecuted Sam Ginsberg for selling copies of the magazines “Sir” and “Mr. Annual” to a sixteen-year-old boy (Ibid). In this case, the Supreme Court upheld a New York state criminal statute (484-h) which prohibited retailers from selling content matter to minors under the age of seventeen, if the material was deemed to be “obscene” (Ibid). At the time (a few years before Miller v. California), the concern was not what counted as obscene, but rather whether the material would be considered obscene for adults (Ibid). Section 484-h of New York’s criminal statute prohibited selling to any person under the age of seventeen content that had either pictures of nudity or sexual conduct or literature containing accounts that stimulate sexual excitement as they were considered “harmful to minors” (Ibid). The court defined “harmful to minors” as what was considered to be offensive in the adult community with respect to what was suitable for minors (Ibid). The Court (led by Justice William Brennan) ruled that section 484-h did not violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments as a restriction on expression…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in the First Amendment to the Constitution. So why do we need to be concerned…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    week2assignment

    • 1559 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Question 7. 7. Which statement might be used to argue that pornography should be more tightly regulated? (Points : 1)…

    • 1559 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Book Censorship

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prominent novels are being thrown off the shelves of libraries, movie films are “crucified” by churches and other parental figures; parents shun their children from certain media crediting online profanities they deem unsanitary and hardly fits their child’s standards. Youth will cease to accumulate knowledge of reality beyond the barricade of coddling granted by their guardians—a crux of sacrilegious restrictions implemented just for their “safety” and “wellbeing.” Sheltering someone for a certain amount of time, or at the very least cripple their feeble minds condemns them of popular shows, novels, and anything considered unsuitable to the guardian. Therefore, censorship should not prevent children’s permission to browse these blacklisted…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Third Wave Feminism

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Modern strands of second-wave feminism are often associated with identifying patriarchy as the overarching oppressor, and therefore calling for the destruction of patriarchal society and promoting female liberation from male oppression. Second-wave feminists believe that the actions that third-wave feminists believe are empowering or liberating are actually oppressive and this is because it harms women on both a micro and macro level. While third-wave feminists support and encourage the consumption of pornographic material second-wave feminists believe that it should be eradicated as a form of entertainment; even ‘feminist porn’ replicates heteropatriarchal ideas of female submission. Sheila Jeffreys stated that “the new feminist erotica looked a lot like the old antifeminist pornography: it eroticized dominance and submission” showing that even ‘feminist porn’ mimics the patriarchal stereotypes seen in traditional porn and society as a whole. This type of sexual activity is not empowering or liberating for women, and by partaking in these sexual acts women are perpetuating the idea that they are naturally subordinate or submissive. Not only does pornography replicate gender stereotypes in…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    MacKinnon’s push for the removal of the right to free speech is not only reckless, but extremely dangerous. As an American, MacKinnon fails to recognise that it is a fundamental democratic right recognized in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and that freedom of speech is far too precious a protection to be eliminated. She attempts to justify her arguments by using the example of protecting pornography. This poor argument to such an important right in the US does not represent it in its full scope. The First Amendment ensures that speech ensures that every person has the opportunity to express their views.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship in America

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Taylor, Charles. "Censorship is Not an Effective Way to Protect Children." n.d. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 8 April 2012.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment: freedom of speech is violated with censorship. In the ALA Library Bill of Rights, parents, and only parents, have the right to prohibit or control what their children read. Freedom of expression and of opinion is for everyone, not just for the people that the majority thinks are right. In 1953, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas said, “Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could easily defeat us,”(Quotations: First Amendment, Censorship…). This shows that even the government can see the harmful effects of book banning. Furthermore, “the school alone has the final say in what books are appropriate for the children under its care to read,…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The recent decision resulting from Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition, 2002 reenergizes many issues related to the First Amendment and free speech. The focus of the aforementioned case is the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). There is a contention as to the courts and legislature's handling of virtual child pornography and whether it garners the same treatment– banned – as traditional child pornography. All sides of the issue consequently address the scope of the First Amendment, and Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court where he correctly limited the scope of intervention. Before delving into the hostile arena of virtual child pornography, a broader understanding of the context surrounding the First Amendment and…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays