Susan M Wolf's Argument On Active Euthanasia

request of suicide, and euthanasia. She also admitted that physicians must honor a patient rescue to be free of unwanted life sustaining treatment. I'm not agree with her argument because euthanasia forms part of passive euthanasia. Susan M Wolf contradicts herself in this part when she said that physician must no accede to the request of suicide and euthanasia. Then she said that physicians must honor patient rescue to be free of unwanted life sustaining treatment which is the passive euthanasia. I believe that both active euthanasia, and passive euthanasia should be assisted by physicians in certain cases that meet legal regulation. For example, in the essay Assited Suicide: The Philosophers' Brief, by Ronal Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, Thomas Scanlon, and Judith Jarvis Thomas. They believe that the right to assisted suicide could be grounded in the due process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and various case decisions in the U.S. Supreme court. They argue that an individual has a right to make highly personal and intimate choices critical to his or her dignity and autonomy including, marriages, procreation, and death. They hold that states should protect his right provided that the risks involved are properly controlled through appropriated regulation. In other word some people may want to dies not for a
He thinks that physician assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia are independent arguments of a death with dignity. It is more about the process of dying than about the process of death. I think that he is right with this argument of death with dignity because Many people think that staying alive in case of terminal illness is a dignity for them. Others think that a death without suffering is dignity to them because they will not have to be dependent of other people, and people will not have to see them